Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We rent, by choice. We have great landlords, have been in the same place for 10 years, love our community. Our housing is a fixed cost and we save a ton of money every month - way over any equity, appreciation, or deductions we would be getting by buying. We plan to pay cash for a house in retirement, but not here. I work in finance-related field and often have people asking me why we've chosen this route - I have found that no one really ever runs the actual numbers to see what makes sense. There's all kinds of kool-aid out there, and you most likely are drinking a lot of it if you are puzzled about why someone with means would choose to rent.
This is me too. Mid 30s. Lots of time spent running the numbers and for me - renting is it.
+10000000
I can afford to buy I CHOOSE not to. I have saved up so much. Have you seen the cost of the crappy houses around the D.C area? Not worth it! The $700k to 1 million dollar homes look like $100k-$300k houses in the South. No thanks. I'm saving my money and do what ever I want. The landlord takes cares of all home repairs. My rent stays the same and utilities.
This comment really bothers me.
There are nice houses in the DC area that are not in the 500K+ bracket, but one has to look for it.
I have seen people that are in their 50's and beyond live in apartments, does the OP want to bust those chops too?
Anonymous wrote:NP here. I am pretty sure the landlord who posted earlier was raising the rent $100 a month, so, $1200 a year. That is more than many people make in raises around here -- unless two IT professionals live there. And, that is a lot if the amenities aren't improving.
My landlord won't install or even let me install light fixtures in the BR closets of our supposedly luxury condo and it is so petty. I am a great tenant -- plus, he had to evict the last one due to drug use and behavioral issues that disturbed the whole building. His cost to evict, plus the lost rent during the turnover to a new renter had to cost close to $10k, and yet he could not even be bothered to repaint before we moved in.
Growing up, my family did a lot for our landlord in terms of home maintenance, and in return he almost never raised the rent, which saved us from financial hardship. I doubt he will ever know how much we appreciated that.
I have owned three homes as an adult and despite the dark closets, I am happy to rent again. When life changes hit you, it is nice to have the flexibility to move.
As more housing stock, especially apartments and condos, are built in the DMV, landlords may find they have to hang on to their good tenants to avoid the lost rent from empty units. Think twice about your rent hikes, please.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We rent, by choice. We have great landlords, have been in the same place for 10 years, love our community. Our housing is a fixed cost and we save a ton of money every month - way over any equity, appreciation, or deductions we would be getting by buying. We plan to pay cash for a house in retirement, but not here. I work in finance-related field and often have people asking me why we've chosen this route - I have found that no one really ever runs the actual numbers to see what makes sense. There's all kinds of kool-aid out there, and you most likely are drinking a lot of it if you are puzzled about why someone with means would choose to rent.
This is not a normal situation for a renter. In fact, having your rent not go up for 10 years is a VERY UNUSUAL situation. Many renters end up moving out of places they love because they can't afford the rent anymore.
Not pp, but we rent a SFH and our rent has been unchanged in the 7 years we've been in the home. I would not rent from a homeowner who raised the rent every year. I'm paying down your mortgage and you have a stable long-term renter. Don't rock the boat being greedy.
Sounds like dumb landlords. I increase the rent in my rental property each year by $100. I know it won't cause them to move out because it would be more expensive to hire movers and put down another security deposit.
I seriously doubt you raise your rent by $100 EVERY year. And, if you do, you're an ass. You should be grateful for responsible and stable tenants, not greedy.
$100 rent increase a year isn't much.
If you want your rent to be fixed for life, then buy your own damned house. And by the way - you're the greedy one. The landlord owns the property and has the right to raise the rent. You're a renter. You don't have the right to demand your rent to stay the same.
NP. Depends what the contract says, obviously. And landlords in some states have very few rights. In NY, for example, tenants rule...good luck evicting one....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We rent, by choice. We have great landlords, have been in the same place for 10 years, love our community. Our housing is a fixed cost and we save a ton of money every month - way over any equity, appreciation, or deductions we would be getting by buying. We plan to pay cash for a house in retirement, but not here. I work in finance-related field and often have people asking me why we've chosen this route - I have found that no one really ever runs the actual numbers to see what makes sense. There's all kinds of kool-aid out there, and you most likely are drinking a lot of it if you are puzzled about why someone with means would choose to rent.
This is me too. Mid 30s. Lots of time spent running the numbers and for me - renting is it.
+10000000
I can afford to buy I CHOOSE not to. I have saved up so much. Have you seen the cost of the crappy houses around the D.C area? Not worth it! The $700k to 1 million dollar homes look like $100k-$300k houses in the South. No thanks. I'm saving my money and do what ever I want. The landlord takes cares of all home repairs. My rent stays the same and utilities.
Anonymous wrote:I rent. We make $250,000, so we are doing OK. We are in our late 40s and have owned before.
We've rented the same house now for 9 years. I didn't know the area when I got the job, and we decided to rent before we figured out where we wanted to buy. And we "still" don't know where we'd like to live "permanently."
I've saved like crazy instead of putting money into home repairs, and that is a nice feeling. I've done the home repair route before, when I didn't have much disposable income. Not fun. So maybe i'm a little unreasonably gun shy on that point.
We will likely buy a single family home in a beach community when we retire, which is FAR cheaper than this area. I'll buy new, one level, and get old there comfortably.
Anonymous wrote:NP here. I am pretty sure the landlord who posted earlier was raising the rent $100 a month, so, $1200 a year. That is more than many people make in raises around here -- unless two IT professionals live there. And, that is a lot if the amenities aren't improving.
My landlord won't install or even let me install light fixtures in the BR closets of our supposedly luxury condo and it is so petty. I am a great tenant -- plus, he had to evict the last one due to drug use and behavioral issues that disturbed the whole building. His cost to evict, plus the lost rent during the turnover to a new renter had to cost close to $10k, and yet he could not even be bothered to repaint before we moved in.
Growing up, my family did a lot for our landlord in terms of home maintenance, and in return he almost never raised the rent, which saved us from financial hardship. I doubt he will ever know how much we appreciated that.
I have owned three homes as an adult and despite the dark closets, I am happy to rent again. When life changes hit you, it is nice to have the flexibility to move.
As more housing stock, especially apartments and condos, are built in the DMV, landlords may find they have to hang on to their good tenants to avoid the lost rent from empty units. Think twice about your rent hikes, please.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We rent, by choice. We have great landlords, have been in the same place for 10 years, love our community. Our housing is a fixed cost and we save a ton of money every month - way over any equity, appreciation, or deductions we would be getting by buying. We plan to pay cash for a house in retirement, but not here. I work in finance-related field and often have people asking me why we've chosen this route - I have found that no one really ever runs the actual numbers to see what makes sense. There's all kinds of kool-aid out there, and you most likely are drinking a lot of it if you are puzzled about why someone with means would choose to rent.
This is not a normal situation for a renter. In fact, having your rent not go up for 10 years is a VERY UNUSUAL situation. Many renters end up moving out of places they love because they can't afford the rent anymore.
Not pp, but we rent a SFH and our rent has been unchanged in the 7 years we've been in the home. I would not rent from a homeowner who raised the rent every year. I'm paying down your mortgage and you have a stable long-term renter. Don't rock the boat being greedy.
Sounds like dumb landlords. I increase the rent in my rental property each year by $100. I know it won't cause them to move out because it would be more expensive to hire movers and put down another security deposit.
I seriously doubt you raise your rent by $100 EVERY year. And, if you do, you're an ass. You should be grateful for responsible and stable tenants, not greedy.
Anonymous wrote:Learned something here -- to avoid the problem of "where will you live in retirement/how will you pay the rent then," I will save aggressively during renting to get money to pay a down payment on a retirement home -- located somewhere that makes sense to live when I am retired. Good goal, even if I don't ever buy again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I do not understand the point in the poorly written sentence mentioning Wisconsin. Why was that state singled out?
How literal of you. OP probably means these friends aren't transplants from flyover country -- as lots of those folks want to go back and thus it's not worth buying in DC if they only want to stay for 5 yrs. Seems like these friends are from this area and there isn't any logical reason to move -- as far as OP knows -- they may just not be telling her that there's a good offer looming in Chicago for them.
How dumb and provincial of you to label an area of the country "flyover." And, pro tip, Chicago is in Illinois, not Wisconsin.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I do not understand the point in the poorly written sentence mentioning Wisconsin. Why was that state singled out?
How literal of you. OP probably means these friends aren't transplants from flyover country -- as lots of those folks want to go back and thus it's not worth buying in DC if they only want to stay for 5 yrs. Seems like these friends are from this area and there isn't any logical reason to move -- as far as OP knows -- they may just not be telling her that there's a good offer looming in Chicago for them.