Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She had to have used DE or she froze her own eggs. No way a someone has a first baby at 50 with own (50yo) eggs.
There was no egg freezing 12+ years ago. You could only freeze embryos back then. The technology is very recent.
I froze my eggs in 2006 so check your facts. In FLY OVER AMERICA at that!
It wasn't readily available until around 2008, so yes, you would be among the first (I said 12+ years ago, see above). You just made my point even stronger. Sure, you could try to freeze them prior to this, but it was very difficult to fertilize eggs harvested before VITRIFICATION. I just blew your mind.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She had to have used DE or she froze her own eggs. No way a someone has a first baby at 50 with own (50yo) eggs.
There was no egg freezing 12+ years ago. You could only freeze embryos back then. The technology is very recent.
I froze my eggs in 2006 so check your facts. In FLY OVER AMERICA at that!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She had to have used DE or she froze her own eggs. No way a someone has a first baby at 50 with own (50yo) eggs.
There was no egg freezing 12+ years ago. You could only freeze embryos back then. The technology is very recent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She had to have used DE or she froze her own eggs. No way a someone has a first baby at 50 with own (50yo) eggs.
There was no egg freezing 12+ years ago. You could only freeze embryos back then. The technology is very recent.
You are wrong. Check your facts. It's been available for 20+ years. Also, Janet just moved out with her son.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She had to have used DE or she froze her own eggs. No way a someone has a first baby at 50 with own (50yo) eggs.
There was no egg freezing 12+ years ago. You could only freeze embryos back then. The technology is very recent.
Anonymous wrote:She had to have used DE or she froze her own eggs. No way a someone has a first baby at 50 with own (50yo) eggs.