Anonymous wrote:We are super lucky that when kids are out of school, our workplace will send a nanny from a service to watch the kids. I was working from home, and she took my 5 and 7 out for a walk. I met them in the kitchen, where she told me he carried a bleeding, dead bird home in his palm, and left him in the carport. I looked at her bewildered. She said, "I asked him three times to put it down, and he wouldn't." Of course he got an earful from me for not listening, but come on. Shouldn't she have been more insistent?
I am thinking about telling the agency, but wonder if this is an over reaction. Thoughts?
Anonymous wrote:I would have wanted the nanny to remove it from his hand physically.
Anonymous wrote:OP here.
My husband found a seminar for kids where they can learn about birds/raptures. (GW Parkway.) They put gloves on, and can hold live animals, and learn what to do if they come across one that is injured or dead. We are going this weekend, and continue to talk to kids about enjoying wildlife while being safe.
The dead bird is in the woods outside our house, and I pray that none of the neighborhood kids find it.
Anonymous wrote:OP here.
My husband found a seminar for kids where they can learn about birds/raptures. (GW Parkway.) They put gloves on, and can hold live animals, and learn what to do if they come across one that is injured or dead. We are going this weekend, and continue to talk to kids about enjoying wildlife while being safe.
The dead bird is in the woods outside our house, and I pray that none of the neighborhood kids find it.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think this one story provides enough information to determine that her child does not behave.
At some point every child, especially a child of that age, does not listen. If he does this often, it is a problem.
Only OP knows if it is a pattern.
What we do know is the child is curious about animals and he thought he could maybe bring the bird back to life,
which is adorable. If anything I think this would be a cute story some day and I love that she is helping him explore
that interest. As far as the nanny goes, I think it's right that she shouldn't get in trouble at all. However, I think in that
scenario, she could have stopped walking, asked him to show her the bird, then suggested they lay the bird next to the
tree and they could come back with a shoe box to bury it, or something like that.... She is not at fault but could have been
more thoughtful or creative in her response.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Thanks everyone. My husband believes that we shouldn't report it, and instead have a SERIOUS talk with my son about not listening. He has just started pushing boundaries, and he didn't know this nanny.
BUT, I wish I had reinforced with her that kids should be asked to wash hands after playing outside. Especially if they picked up road kill. She didn't seem concerned with this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:you really can't win. Problem is, in this area, parents cater to every whim of their child. They make excuses for everything that little johnny does, etc.
So, if she had disciplined him in a way that you didn't find appropriate, she would have been screwed. And if she didn't, she was screwed.
She told your son not to pick it up, he disobeyed her. In my world, that blame is solely on your son. He's 5. He knows how to listen to an adult.
The only way to make a five-year-old drop something is to use physical force. And frankly, a lot of it. How would you have reacted if your sons had reported that the babysitter grabbed your son's arm and shook it hard? What if it left bruises? What if she had to pry the bird out of his hands and he complained that she hurt his fingers? Or scratched him?
She told him to put it down. He disobeyed. At least she had him put in on a plate or something when he got home.
Yes, he should have washed his hands.