Anonymous wrote:Nader ran as an independent. Sanders is doing the decent thing by making his run in the primary so that he does not do what Nader did.
I'm not voting for sanders, but he is being as responsible as one can expect, given that he has legitimate disagreements with the dems.
Anonymous wrote:Nader ran as an independent. Sanders is doing the decent thing by making his run in the primary so that he does not do what Nader did.
I'm not voting for sanders, but he is being as responsible as one can expect, given that he has legitimate disagreements with the dems.
The Dems have legitimate disagreements with the Dems. That's what a primary is about.
Sure. But if a majority votes for something, the party should be falling in line behind that. That's something Republicans are very good at. And that's why they win.
Have some patience. The process is still going on. The convention is where this "falling in line" happens. We are not at the convention yet. And the Republicans may or may not be very good at this. And they don't always win.
Anonymous wrote:
And if Sanders is nominated, be prepared to "fall in line" behind him.
Anonymous wrote:Nader ran as an independent. Sanders is doing the decent thing by making his run in the primary so that he does not do what Nader did.
I'm not voting for sanders, but he is being as responsible as one can expect, given that he has legitimate disagreements with the dems.
The Dems have legitimate disagreements with the Dems. That's what a primary is about.
Sure. But if a majority votes for something, the party should be falling in line behind that. That's something Republicans are very good at. And that's why they win.
Actually the party failed to fall in line last election. And they are failing this time as well.
EXACTLY. And they had problems with this the time before that too!
Nader ran as an independent. Sanders is doing the decent thing by making his run in the primary so that he does not do what Nader did.
I'm not voting for sanders, but he is being as responsible as one can expect, given that he has legitimate disagreements with the dems.
The Dems have legitimate disagreements with the Dems. That's what a primary is about.
Sure. But if a majority votes for something, the party should be falling in line behind that. That's something Republicans are very good at. And that's why they win.
Actually the party failed to fall in line last election. And they are failing this time as well.
Anonymous wrote:
And if Sanders is nominated, be prepared to "fall in line" behind him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nader ran as an independent. Sanders is doing the decent thing by making his run in the primary so that he does not do what Nader did.
I'm not voting for sanders, but he is being as responsible as one can expect, given that he has legitimate disagreements with the dems.
The Dems have legitimate disagreements with the Dems. That's what a primary is about.
Sure. But if a majority votes for something, the party should be falling in line behind that. That's something Republicans are very good at. And that's why they win.
Nader ran as an independent. Sanders is doing the decent thing by making his run in the primary so that he does not do what Nader did.
I'm not voting for sanders, but he is being as responsible as one can expect, given that he has legitimate disagreements with the dems.
The Dems have legitimate disagreements with the Dems. That's what a primary is about.
Sure. But if a majority votes for something, the party should be falling in line behind that. That's something Republicans are very good at. And that's why they win.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nader ran as an independent. Sanders is doing the decent thing by making his run in the primary so that he does not do what Nader did.
I'm not voting for sanders, but he is being as responsible as one can expect, given that he has legitimate disagreements with the dems.
The Dems have legitimate disagreements with the Dems. That's what a primary is about.
Anonymous wrote:Nader ran as an independent. Sanders is doing the decent thing by making his run in the primary so that he does not do what Nader did.
I'm not voting for sanders, but he is being as responsible as one can expect, given that he has legitimate disagreements with the dems.
Anonymous wrote:My fear is that he's weakening her chances in the general. That would be tragic and much more important than him continuing to plug on.
Okay. Here it is. Finally. You are worried that Hillary is weak. That she is not strong enough to take on the Republicans. If she is not the strongest candidate, maybe she should not be the nominee. Hillary is the only one who can weaken her chances. If Sanders can do it, she wasn't strong enough. Maybe she should heed Sander's message and make herself stronger.
If she is the best candidate, you have nothing to worry about. And, as you say, Bernie is a "phony" . . . and just a "bad person" so not to worry.