Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why don't you folks lobby for Ellington to host the arts program? They have the equipment, teachers and funds, right? I bet they will increase the Hardy enrollment eirh the extra space.
That's a good idea, assuming that the staff is able to work with young children. When will the renovations be ready?
Who would make such an assumption? Elementary education is so fundamentally different from HS. This sounds like the fartchild of someone whose brain thinks "oh - teaching, arts, programming... aren't they all the same?"![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a little emotionally over-wrought, no?
Your kid is going to come home crying over much more important things in the future.
No. This is awful.
No. In the scope of things it really isn't. When high-strung entitled white families don't have access to the NPR of cheap and free arts programs in a city where a significant number of children can't read at grade level and SN students are underserved, this is not awful.
So, no.
Do you understand anything about education? Do you also think recess is a luxury for whiners? Arts and music and physical activity are absolutely necessary for performance in your precious "academic" studies. No wonder we're raising generations of visually illiterate and lazy kids.
Really? Why did OP's child come home crying? Didn't the principal not know about the letter from DCPS? Did any of the principals send something other than or in addition to that letter?Anonymous wrote: Which principals don't want the Fillmore arrangement? From what I know, all 5 principals support the continuation of Fillmore.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why don't you folks lobby for Ellington to host the arts program? They have the equipment, teachers and funds, right? I bet they will increase the Hardy enrollment eirh the extra space.
That's a good idea, assuming that the staff is able to work with young children. When will the renovations be ready?
Anonymous wrote:
That would leaves Hyde, Key and Stoddert, Hardy feeder schools. Maybe the leaders of those schools can figure out a way to make it work. Perhaps more IB people would attend Hardy if it was incorporated directly into feeders and indirectly through Fillmore breathing the same air in the Hardy building.
Anonymous wrote:From the "Brent" thread, there's a link to last week's D.C. Council Public Oversight Hearing on schools, involving Kaya Henderson, Beers, and others:
http://dc.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=3105
At minute 50, Mary Cheh had questions about the homeless shelter; at min 54, Cheh has questions on Fillmore.
The good news is at min 57, Kaya Henderson said she "will cooperate" to keep Fillmore open next year with more funds.
Henderson repeated some incorrect talking points about Fillmore, such as the idea that Fillmore used to serve the entire city for period of time, and that there has been a significant dropoff of Fillmore feeder schools in the past few years which makes it less financially practical than it once was. Simply untrue.
Kaya also suggested that Fillmore needs public-private funding, like Ellington, if it wants a long-term future. That is probably true, Fillmore supporters!
Anonymous wrote:Stoddert has 0 spare rooms, too. The new unfunded LEAP requirements further restricted the school's ability to make new space or do anything more to fund arts programming and certainly not start up a new arts program at the school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why don't you folks lobby for Ellington to host the arts program? They have the equipment, teachers and funds, right? I bet they will increase the Hardy enrollment eirh the extra space.
That's a good idea, assuming that the staff is able to work with young children. When will the renovations be ready?
Anonymous wrote:Why don't you folks lobby for Ellington to host the arts program? They have the equipment, teachers and funds, right? I bet they will increase the Hardy enrollment eirh the extra space.