Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is not just a school thing. The gifted label was developed by psychologists in reference to IQ tests. Anything above a certain IQ is considered gifted.
but schools aren't giving IQ tests - so their definition of gifted is not based on that. (I don't believe that "inview" for example is an IQ test).
Anonymous wrote:It is not just a school thing. The gifted label was developed by psychologists in reference to IQ tests. Anything above a certain IQ is considered gifted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In MoCo schools, about 95% of parents believe that their kids are gifted. It's worse than Lake Woebegone.
But kids take a gazillion standardized tests. Inview, MAP every year, maybe HGC, and more. The test results are pretty clear, right? Don't parents pay attention and modify their expectations, one way or another, based on them?
I'm in FFX county (parent) and IMO nope. My child scored super high (99+%) at all the "gifted" tests, I graduated from Ivy and top grad school. We're both normal, maybe brighter than average, but nothing exceptional. I worked hard in school. If DC wins the Nobel price or cures cancer, that's another story. But he's in elementary school, it's comical to discuss how brilliant they are at this age. My brother barely finished a tier 3 college, hated school but he's very creative, a risk taker, and great at networking and selling. Guess who's the multimillionaire in the family.
So you're judging your DC against adult standards when s/he consistently tests in the top 99 percentile nationally? Weird. You don't think s/he merits enrichment/acceleration based on these scores? That's quite separate from determining whether she's as creative as your brother, who apparently scored less well on such tests. The tests predict academic success, not necessarily professional.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't believe that the current tests/criteria for determining if one is "gifted" are accurate, though. Very few children are truly gifted.
I agree. There seems to be a misuse of the word "gifted"
Anonymous wrote:I don't believe that the current tests/criteria for determining if one is "gifted" are accurate, though. Very few children are truly gifted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In MoCo schools, about 95% of parents believe that their kids are gifted. It's worse than Lake Woebegone.
But kids take a gazillion standardized tests. Inview, MAP every year, maybe HGC, and more. The test results are pretty clear, right? Don't parents pay attention and modify their expectations, one way or another, based on them?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In MoCo schools, about 95% of parents believe that their kids are gifted. It's worse than Lake Woebegone.
But kids take a gazillion standardized tests. Inview, MAP every year, maybe HGC, and more. The test results are pretty clear, right? Don't parents pay attention and modify their expectations, one way or another, based on them?
I'm in FFX county (parent) and IMO nope. My child scored super high (99+%) at all the "gifted" tests, I graduated from Ivy and top grad school. We're both normal, maybe brighter than average, but nothing exceptional. I worked hard in school. If DC wins the Nobel price or cures cancer, that's another story. But he's in elementary school, it's comical to discuss how brilliant they are at this age. My brother barely finished a tier 3 college, hated school but he's very creative, a risk taker, and great at networking and selling. Guess who's the multimillionaire in the family.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In MoCo schools, about 95% of parents believe that their kids are gifted. It's worse than Lake Woebegone.
But kids take a gazillion standardized tests. Inview, MAP every year, maybe HGC, and more. The test results are pretty clear, right? Don't parents pay attention and modify their expectations, one way or another, based on them?
I'm in FFX county (parent) and IMO nope. My child scored super high (99+%) at all the "gifted" tests, I graduated from Ivy and top grad school. We're both normal, maybe brighter than average, but nothing exceptional. I worked hard in school. If DC wins the Nobel price or cures cancer, that's another story. But he's in elementary school, it's comical to discuss how brilliant they are at this age. My brother barely finished a tier 3 college, hated school but he's very creative, a risk taker, and great at networking and selling. Guess who's the multimillionaire in the family.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In MoCo schools, about 95% of parents believe that their kids are gifted. It's worse than Lake Woebegone.
But kids take a gazillion standardized tests. Inview, MAP every year, maybe HGC, and more. The test results are pretty clear, right? Don't parents pay attention and modify their expectations, one way or another, based on them?
Anonymous wrote:In MoCo schools, about 95% of parents believe that their kids are gifted. It's worse than Lake Woebegone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the reason parents of younger kids think they have gifted children is simply because the developmental difference in those ages can be so huge. You have some 3/4 year olds learning to read whereas others don't learn until they are 6/7. I can understand a person who has very little exposure to children beyond her own to start confusing that developmental milestone with being gifted. By the time you hit the later grades these differences start to mellow out. You might notice some differences between your child and their peers but it's not likely to be as obvious as it was in kindergarten.
Agree.
+2. I was a very precocious reader and identified as gifted in elementary school. Trust me, I'm not gifted, lol.