Someone has read too many new age childrearing books...at what point does the child learn that he needs to respect, cooperate, etc. Life does not occur in a vacuum where only the needs of one mater. Children who never learn this and believe the world revolves around them grow up to be entitled, narcissistic, and obnoxious. Children's needs can be met, they can be respected, and they can have "hope" and still have manners and courtesy.Anonymous wrote:
I don't think being rude or a spoiled brat has anything to do with it.
Think about the exchange in terms of game strategy, OP. Your child chose to defect, rather than cooperate (PPs, replace "brat" with "defector" to understand my point). This is a presumably repeat-player scenario, meaning your child knows he will keep going to the dinner table, and will keep interacting with you and the ILs. So why was there so little incentive for him to cooperate among repeat players, especially since kids would like to do nothing more than receive positive attention of the adults that they are dependent on?
That's the real issue, and it's not going to be solved by yelling at him how rude he is being, or demanding he eat whatever is served to him, or ratcheting up the punishing consequences, like PPs have suggested you ought to do. You solve it by developing a relationship where he can trust that his needs will be known, respected, considered, and met often enough over time by caregivers, and therefore he becomes willing to cooperate in repeat player scenarios like this one, especially if it's important to you. The alternative to that is giving up that hope, defecting to try to meet whatever his current need is in whatever (usually sub-optimal) way he is capable of, and incurring whatever consequences may come of that defection, including being yelled at or punished.
My childhood was lived that second way, but it had nothing to do with being spoiled -- it's the opposite of spoiled, actually.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You actually let your hild go fix himself something he "liked" after an adult prepared a full dinner?
You honestly think that was ok?
Not OP, but I allow my kids to do this and I 100% think it's okay. If my kids don't like dinner, they are free to make a sandwich and eat it with a piece of fruit. I am not doing it for them, but I don't make them eat what I have prepared.
It's a rule at our house that the kids have to try anything new, and they have to be polite when they decline to eat it, but they don't have to eat stuff they don't like. That is freakishly controlling.
Not every person cares for the same foods. People should not be forced to eat things that they don't enjoy. Food should be a pleasure, not a punishment, and people should have control over what they put in their own bodies.
This is too sane and reasonable. The DCUMers will never go for it.
How do you handle it when you aren't at home?
I'm thinking of implementing a similar system with my kids, but I don't want it to be an issue when we eat out. Do you pack things they like? Ask hosts to provide certain dishes?
Anonymous wrote:Somehow, I doubt his bad behavior is occasional but is constant.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You actually let your hild go fix himself something he "liked" after an adult prepared a full dinner?
You honestly think that was ok?
Not OP, but I allow my kids to do this and I 100% think it's okay. If my kids don't like dinner, they are free to make a sandwich and eat it with a piece of fruit. I am not doing it for them, but I don't make them eat what I have prepared.
It's a rule at our house that the kids have to try anything new, and they have to be polite when they decline to eat it, but they don't have to eat stuff they don't like. That is freakishly controlling.
Not every person cares for the same foods. People should not be forced to eat things that they don't enjoy. Food should be a pleasure, not a punishment, and people should have control over what they put in their own bodies.
This is too sane and reasonable. The DCUMers will never go for it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You actually let your hild go fix himself something he "liked" after an adult prepared a full dinner?
You honestly think that was ok?
Not OP, but I allow my kids to do this and I 100% think it's okay. If my kids don't like dinner, they are free to make a sandwich and eat it with a piece of fruit. I am not doing it for them, but I don't make them eat what I have prepared.
It's a rule at our house that the kids have to try anything new, and they have to be polite when they decline to eat it, but they don't have to eat stuff they don't like. That is freakishly controlling.
Not every person cares for the same foods. People should not be forced to eat things that they don't enjoy. Food should be a pleasure, not a punishment, and people should have control over what they put in their own bodies.
This is too sane and reasonable. The DCUMers will never go for it.
How do you handle it when you aren't at home?
I'm thinking of implementing a similar system with my kids, but I don't want it to be an issue when we eat out. Do you pack things they like? Ask hosts to provide certain dishes?
Are you serious? Teach your kids to politely decline at someone's home. Are you going to ask people to provide your kids with chicken nuggets?
He sharing of food is an important social custom and understood contract. Learning how to be a gracious guest is an important skill. Because something your host is serving isn't something you "like" is no excuse to miss the essence of being gracious and polite. I've known this since I was probably 4, and could act accordingly. I've eaten hundreds of meals that I didn't "like" that have not killed me, nor did they kill me as a child.
I know this goes against the prevailing precious snowflake direction on this board, but there is no reason a 7 year old cannot learn to have a sit down dinner with guests and learn to eat what is there, despite his like or dislike for it. Had I been there, I would have rolled my eyes too.
Hey - you want to let yr 7 year old run the show at dinner most nights - well, you be you. But he should also learn what it is do have a sit down dinner with guests (even if they are family) and to engage in participating in the meal that is served, even if it does not serve best to his 7 year old preferences.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You actually let your hild go fix himself something he "liked" after an adult prepared a full dinner?
You honestly think that was ok?
Not OP, but I allow my kids to do this and I 100% think it's okay. If my kids don't like dinner, they are free to make a sandwich and eat it with a piece of fruit. I am not doing it for them, but I don't make them eat what I have prepared.
It's a rule at our house that the kids have to try anything new, and they have to be polite when they decline to eat it, but they don't have to eat stuff they don't like. That is freakishly controlling.
Not every person cares for the same foods. People should not be forced to eat things that they don't enjoy. Food should be a pleasure, not a punishment, and people should have control over what they put in their own bodies.
This is too sane and reasonable. The DCUMers will never go for it.
How do you handle it when you aren't at home?
I'm thinking of implementing a similar system with my kids, but I don't want it to be an issue when we eat out. Do you pack things they like? Ask hosts to provide certain dishes?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You actually let your hild go fix himself something he "liked" after an adult prepared a full dinner?
You honestly think that was ok?
Not OP, but I allow my kids to do this and I 100% think it's okay. If my kids don't like dinner, they are free to make a sandwich and eat it with a piece of fruit. I am not doing it for them, but I don't make them eat what I have prepared.
It's a rule at our house that the kids have to try anything new, and they have to be polite when they decline to eat it, but they don't have to eat stuff they don't like. That is freakishly controlling.
Not every person cares for the same foods. People should not be forced to eat things that they don't enjoy. Food should be a pleasure, not a punishment, and people should have control over what they put in their own bodies.
This is too sane and reasonable. The DCUMers will never go for it.
Anonymous wrote:They are old and forget what it was really like. They only remember the days they got right and forget their own parenting fails (or reinterpret their parenting fails as "the right way to raise kids." It's human nature to rewrite history to make yourself look good.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They're entitled to their opinions about what the are observing. They are right or wrong or just have a different opinion than you. But you should think about why this bothers you so much when they're not confronting you about it. Maybe their judgment and disapproval bother you bc part of you feels the same way. You may even be projecting some things on to them. Raise your children hoe you feel is sincerely best. IF you do that, others' opinions will not bother you.
You don't criticize people who are hosting you. Period.
When did they criticize?
With looks and whispers, they were passive aggressively ariticizing both the kid and the parents.