Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There will always be haters -- people don't want to believe that you can actually live well if you spend below your income and don't go into debt. That you can save money and stop working before you're 70 years old. That you can spend your time finding something meaningful to do with those 40 years after you retire at 30. I think MMM has some great ideas and I'm going to teach my children that they don't need to work until they drop dead if they don't want to.
There will always be people like yourself who try and obfuscate the fact he is promoting the idea everyine, including himself that it's possible to retire at 30 on 20K a year with a family of 4. All this promotion while collecting 400K a year the whole time.
This is a little bit like the trust fund kids who adopt a radical, theoretically altruistic political or social philosophy. They join the working class or the disenfranchised, living on the edge. They advocate. The join communes. They picket.
But in the end, they can hit the red button and walk about any moment they want to leave. They will never have to take the hard fall for a mistake. They don't wake up broke in the inner city or an urban backwater and find they are trapped and can never leave.
Are their goals admirable? Are they nice people, maybe? Sure.
But they're NOT like the people they are trying to help, organize, or lead. They don't have only $23,000 a year. And that is what limits their authority and wisdom to tell the $23,000 a year people what to do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There will always be haters -- people don't want to believe that you can actually live well if you spend below your income and don't go into debt. That you can save money and stop working before you're 70 years old. That you can spend your time finding something meaningful to do with those 40 years after you retire at 30. I think MMM has some great ideas and I'm going to teach my children that they don't need to work until they drop dead if they don't want to.
There will always be people like yourself who try and obfuscate the fact he is promoting the idea everyine, including himself that it's possible to retire at 30 on 20K a year with a family of 4. All this promotion while collecting 400K a year the whole time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, I take issue with his whole premise.
I love my work and will probably work until I die or get dementia.
Same goes for my DH.
So neither of us wants to retire early. We have a nice work/family balance. And we like to buy the things that make our lives easier or support or interests and hobbies. And we can afford it.
We are also saving for that late retirement.
Maybe he hated his engineering job/worked too much? But the truth is he's NOT retired, he's just not traditionally employed. Well, neither am I.
So, I don't see him as being very honest. He's playing semantic games about working and retirement.
I will be general to not "out" myself. My husband is the rare lawyer who loves his work (employment discrimination, civil rights) and I am in a creative/artistic field.
What kind of work do you and your husband do?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm the pp who said I didn't like his inflexibility. Not a hater, but just adding that I think he could be more forthright, which is turning the hate on him.
For example, if he is going to donate the money per the article, why not do it now? Or, just explain after putting it out there. He said right after the Post article he was making $50K, so it's been profitable since the beginning.
He said they only use 2.5 tanks of gas per year, but I've been to Longmont and a few trips to Denver airport (he says he travels) would probably eat that up. Does he then budget car service? I'm not reading him now, so perhaps he does. As an aside, that probably means that his wife can't go out at night with friends unless they drive.
Finally, I also stopped reading because it didn't seem entirely realistic. As pp said, what happens when he needs a new couch or his kid needs braces? But his budget never included for those eventualities. Maybe it does now.
He is making excellent money and still has a strong base, he may not want to grow it any more.
+1 I'm the OP and I agree with this. If he's planning on giving the money away later, why not just give it away as he makes it? Or he should just own the fact that he's a high-income guy advising people to live frugally on not much money (and who still thinks that having a substantial stash of cash in reserve isn't such a bad idea).
I don't know. Something about proselytizing militantly frugal living while simultaneously stockpiling cash just seems like a big fakeout to me.
My reverse engineering of this families budget was spot on without actually having been on the site before. My bare bones budget put it at 20K without any travel added. Considering they spent 5K on travel and a total of 25K for the year, my estimation was spot on.
This was a perfect world budget. No matter how handy this guy is, he is not installing a new hvac system, 7900$ on his own. He does not look like he can rebuild a car transmission either.
"And to say that his family is just a step away from dying maybe a bit far fetched?"
I think you missed the point here as it was not to suggest they are a step away from actually dying. Physically the human body doesnt need a lot to survive/exist but on 20-25K a year, it leaves almost nothing to experience it fully.
Pretending his wifes 60K and the 400K from the blog does not exist and act like they dont have any other money to live on is disingenuous. Whether or not they actually live on that posted budget is up for debate because when a news magazine outs your real income, it removes any credibility you may have had.
http://familiesusa.org/product/federal-poverty-guidelines
For a family of 3, 20K a year is considered the poverty level in the US. For most, existing like this is not an acceptable choice especially when they have options to rise well above it.
It would be funny if he is actually getting federal benefits claiming to be living at the poverty level not unlike the alaska bush people who dont actually live in alaska.
http://www.adn.com/article/20141022/stars-alaska-reality-tv-show-charged-pfd-fraud
Anonymous wrote:I'm the pp who said I didn't like his inflexibility. Not a hater, but just adding that I think he could be more forthright, which is turning the hate on him.
For example, if he is going to donate the money per the article, why not do it now? Or, just explain after putting it out there. He said right after the Post article he was making $50K, so it's been profitable since the beginning.
He said they only use 2.5 tanks of gas per year, but I've been to Longmont and a few trips to Denver airport (he says he travels) would probably eat that up. Does he then budget car service? I'm not reading him now, so perhaps he does. As an aside, that probably means that his wife can't go out at night with friends unless they drive.
Finally, I also stopped reading because it didn't seem entirely realistic. As pp said, what happens when he needs a new couch or his kid needs braces? But his budget never included for those eventualities. Maybe it does now.
He is making excellent money and still has a strong base, he may not want to grow it any more.