Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love the way they are handling Marcia Clark - pointing out the ridiculous bullshit she had to deal with, and how sexist things were in the 90s. At least we have social media now to call more things out.
Can you imagine the backlash now if the media or judge commented on a lawyer's outfit and hair like that?
The judge was an utter asshole who didn't deserve to practice law much less be a judge. And at least Johnny Cochrane is dead now. A wife beater who paid off his wife, and I was so livid about his disregard of her childcare situation I wanted to scream. Seriously, F%$& that guy.
Apparently that thing with the box of Tampax really happened to her. I honestly don't see how a person could get up and go to work everyday, between the ex-husband, the opposing lawyers, the media...
Anonymous wrote:I love the way they are handling Marcia Clark - pointing out the ridiculous bullshit she had to deal with, and how sexist things were in the 90s. At least we have social media now to call more things out.
Can you imagine the backlash now if the media or judge commented on a lawyer's outfit and hair like that?
The judge was an utter asshole who didn't deserve to practice law much less be a judge. And at least Johnny Cochrane is dead now. A wife beater who paid off his wife, and I was so livid about his disregard of her childcare situation I wanted to scream. Seriously, F%$& that guy.
Anonymous wrote:We saw the first episode as well.
Alan Dershowitz was interviewed last night. One thing I found interesting is that he said the attorneys should have NEVER released the fact that OJ failed a polygraph. He was quite stunned that happened. There were a few other things he had to say about the series, but when asked if he thought OJ had done it, he said he we never tell his opinion.
He also outlined some of the many mistakes the prosecution made - the glove, the “planted” blood, putting Mark Fuhrman on the stand.
It seems that he was inferring that the defense didn’t “win” the case, but that the state lost it. I would concur having watched most of the trial.
Anonymous wrote:I was a student at USC during this time and I'm surprised I made it through my senior year. We were all glued to the trial. I had several classes where we just sat and watched it.
And here I am glued to this show.![]()
What is it about this case that makes you not want to look away?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Connie Britton as Faye Resnick?? I still can't wrap my head around that miscasting. Resnick is black.
Learned a new term during the program: a "Brentwood hello."
I didn't realise Faye was black. I also agree on the miscasting. It seems resnik would've been a lot younger at that time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone notice the jail time discussion between JC and OJ about OJ not knowing many "black people" and why? THAT was eye opening. I
am wondering if most successful AA people feel this way (or perhaps this is a different thread - hopefully one that would not be stifled). The topic is interesting.
The show features a number of successful African American men who followed different paths in life.
Anonymous wrote:Dateline had a long piece on the case last night. I never knew before that having OJ try on the glove was Darden's idea. That was a Rick Perry level "oops" there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Courtney Vance has been an actor some 20+ years and is married to Angela Bassett and you don't know his name?
Thank you!
People, I mean Mr. Vance no harm. I think he's great. I haven't seen Hunt for Red October or ER, the 2 things mentioned in this thread that he's been in. I will know his name forevermore, forgive me.