Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not unfair. Do you know how hard a person has to work to overcome a drug addiction? You make more than two times what she does. You CHOSE to have children. She did not chose to have a drug addiction. She is doing the best she can. You are doing the best you can. The best you can do gets you MUCH farther than the best she can do gets her.
I would bet my $40k salary that if i looked at your budget you are spending money you could be saving for that down payment on wants rather than on needs.
Now this just pisses me off. As if OP's sister never made any choices. Or if she did, she somehow was not responsible for them. It was all somebody else's fault, while OP is expected to be responsible for her choices.
Agreed. Taking drugs is a choice.
It is absolutely a choice and no way should you enable an addict.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not unfair. Do you know how hard a person has to work to overcome a drug addiction? You make more than two times what she does. You CHOSE to have children. She did not chose to have a drug addiction. She is doing the best she can. You are doing the best you can. The best you can do gets you MUCH farther than the best she can do gets her.
I would bet my $40k salary that if i looked at your budget you are spending money you could be saving for that down payment on wants rather than on needs.
Now this just pisses me off. As if OP's sister never made any choices. Or if she did, she somehow was not responsible for them. It was all somebody else's fault, while OP is expected to be responsible for her choices.
Agreed. Taking drugs is a choice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not unfair. Do you know how hard a person has to work to overcome a drug addiction? You make more than two times what she does. You CHOSE to have children. She did not chose to have a drug addiction. She is doing the best she can. You are doing the best you can. The best you can do gets you MUCH farther than the best she can do gets her.
I would bet my $40k salary that if i looked at your budget you are spending money you could be saving for that down payment on wants rather than on needs.
Now this just pisses me off. As if OP's sister never made any choices. Or if she did, she somehow was not responsible for them. It was all somebody else's fault, while OP is expected to be responsible for her choices.
Anonymous wrote:BTDT. My mom financed many things for my siblings while I was left on my own. I was always happy that I had the skills, ability and drive to make it on my own and that I never relied on anyone else to take care of me. I was always glad not to be in their shoes, needing to accept my mom's contributions when they were old enough to be supporting and caring for themselves. And, I guess I feel like it would be presumptuous to expect anything even though she was contributing to the support of my siblings.
FWIW, I don't give my kids the same. I give everyone what they need. Some of my kids need more of my money (tutors, special classes) while others don't. I don't plan on giving my oldest a gift in the amount of the cost of my youngest's college education just because he's not going to college - they both get what they need. I suspect that my mom felt the same and that she gave each of us as much as she could to help us turn out to be successful adults and even with this, one of my siblings isn't what anyone would consider successful. My guess is that your mom feels the same, OP.
My sis and I are on different paths. She coasted for a while after college, worked for years at a movie theater, lived at home for free or nearly free, etc. Substantial drug use. But she now has an office gig making around 50k. She is 30, engaged to a guy making around 70k, and they live together. They are trying to buy a home, and apparently she is getting a big assist with her down payment from mom. I think 50k. She has gone from shopping for homes around $350k to $500k.
I am mid 30s, a lawyer in biglaw. married to a lawyer working part time at a small firm. HHI around 400k. We are semi-frugal but have kids to support, high child care expenses, etc. We are doing well. But, we are looking to move to a top school district in 2017 and don't have enough cash for a down payment yet.
I asked mom if she was going to match her gift to my sis with one to me, and she said no. I know my financial picture is better than my sis's, but that's because I put myself through law school, work harder, have been more responsible. Anyway, I just don't think it's right for a parent to make such a big gift to just one child. She wouldn't get my sis nice Xmas gifts and me crappy gifts or no gifts. She wouldn't leave my sis 60% of her estate and me 40%.
So, is this fair or unfair? (For the record, I would never have asked for help, just wondered if I could expect something). Would you subsidize your own kids unevenly like this?
Anonymous wrote:Could go two ways:
1. Parents give equally to each child
2. Parents give each child what they believe each child needs.
Either was, their chioce, not yours.
Anonymous wrote:It's not unfair. Do you know how hard a person has to work to overcome a drug addiction? You make more than two times what she does. You CHOSE to have children. She did not chose to have a drug addiction. She is doing the best she can. You are doing the best you can. The best you can do gets you MUCH farther than the best she can do gets her.
I would bet my $40k salary that if i looked at your budget you are spending money you could be saving for that down payment on wants rather than on needs.
Anonymous wrote:The entitlement on this thread is amazing. Who are you people that think other people's money is your own, even your parents?? Maybe they think, and did, mess up raising you to be entitled and are now choking back to teach you a well-needed lesson. Most of you cannot be real to be this entitled.
Anonymous wrote:Wow, op. Just wow. If I was your mom I would never give you another dime--before or after I die,