Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand how people say they would be bored by spending time with their own children.
Think about it for longer than it takes to hit "reply" and send some scathing comment back.
They are developing and learning and growing at a rapid fire pace, they are full of wonder and joy, they are not bitter or jaded, and they are your offspring. They are little miracles, each and every one.
But post after post claims they find all that boring.
Different people find different things interesting. I don't find it interesting to watch a kid having wonder and joy all day. Clearly you think I should, but I don't. It's best they spend the bulk of the day with someone who will appreciate that, so they have a great nanny.
Anonymous wrote:I don't understand how people say they would be bored by spending time with their own children.
Think about it for longer than it takes to hit "reply" and send some scathing comment back.
They are developing and learning and growing at a rapid fire pace, they are full of wonder and joy, they are not bitter or jaded, and they are your offspring. They are little miracles, each and every one.
But post after post claims they find all that boring.
Anonymous wrote:I don't understand how people say they would be bored by spending time with their own children.
Think about it for longer than it takes to hit "reply" and send some scathing comment back.
They are developing and learning and growing at a rapid fire pace, they are full of wonder and joy, they are not bitter or jaded, and they are your offspring. They are little miracles, each and every one.
But post after post claims they find all that boring.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'll bite.
I work 7-3:30. I am home by 4.
My kids napped 10-11 and 1-3 or they were at preschool from 9-1.
I saw my kids from 4-9 every night and the weekends. When they were little (<3yo) I worked 30 hours a week so I even saw them more. I only worked out of the home 3 times a week.
I never said I was not SAH material, but I probably said I did not see the point of not working... many hours they were asleep or are at preschool. So there were about 4-5 awake hours they did not see me, so I guess I just did not see the point of quitting my job.
Also, I hate to clean, so I appreciate having a cleaning person. I also appreciate the fact that they had a nanny, she was part of our family and I believe contributed to their well being in a positive way. Also, since I worked so little my nanny (later aupair) would work on Saturday every other weekend and my H and I would go out to dinner, run errands, go have a drink, go for a hike/bike ride. It just seemed to make more sense for our family "health" financially/emotionally/etc.
All the SAHMs I know still have cleaning services, nannies, yard service, etc. They're not mutually exclusive.
Anonymous wrote:When I say that, what I mean is that I know my limits. I don't believe I would be a good SAHM. I don't have the patience to deal with my toddler all day, every day for extended periods, I just don't. I would end up snapping and yelling at him and then feeling horribly guilty. I feel like I am a MUCH better mother when I am with him, because of the time I spend away from him (8am-6pm, Monday to Friday).
Anonymous wrote:What's the deal with all these moms pretend playing with their kids all day? Isn't that what siblings , or friends are for? I never play barbie with my daughters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What do they really mean by that?
It always makes me scratch my head because don't you parent your kids on the weekends? It's like that but every day. And they go to school for a good chunk of it (including the preschool years)...
To me it means I'm not of the rich husband/family money material. We need two incomes to support our family, ergo neither of us is stay at home material.
Anonymous wrote:What do they really mean by that?
It always makes me scratch my head because don't you parent your kids on the weekends? It's like that but every day. And they go to school for a good chunk of it (including the preschool years)...
Anonymous wrote:What's the deal with all these moms pretend playing with their kids all day? Isn't that what siblings , or friends are for? I never play barbie with my daughters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It means he can't stand not to have an important job to go to every day and think big, important thoughts that will save the worldBecause don't you ever forget, he is WAY smarter and more important than you. You're barely in his range of sight from up there on his high horse.
fixed that for you
So clever.
I have this lovely SAH neighbor and her husband has no idea how to talk to me. At a birthday party I happen to hear his say something derogatory about women, he caught my eye and just stopped his sentence mid-stream. It was funny but made me sad for her. She is wonderful but her husband doesn't respect her or think she has braincells.
My point was more to draw attention to how ridiculous it would sound to mock a man for going to work, even though (in 2015!) people still feel free to demean women's careers. The sentences above, in their original form (referring to women) were written to shame mothers for working outside the home -- its just blatant sexism hiding under the sheep's clothing of concern for the well-being of children.
Oh. I didn't quite get it. We were both, however, referencing institutional misogyny. And it sucks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm not "SAHM material," but neither am I "employed material." I have a low tolerance for responsibility, which is why I'm one and done!
you must be my slacker soulmate!