Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no draft
It's only a matter of time. This country can't continue to send the same young people on multiple combat deployments while 90% of the populace sit in the homes begging the politicians to engage in more wars.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Woman of two daughters here and I say yes as well. i think that bootcamp and some military service will do our daughters a lot of good.
Does this good include hand to hand combat with ISIS or similar Neanderthal minded enemies in a urban or jungle setting? Crawling in the mud in fox holes alongside men with incoming mortar fire? With the new rules, combat is not an option but an obligation just like for the men, especially in the event of a draft. Careful what you wish for.
Any woman who can get through basis training can engage in combat. So to answer your question, yes!
And of course you are ok with the way the all young, militant, chauvinistic male enemy will treat the 50% young woman soldiers who may end up as POWs, like perhaps your daughter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hope so and its about time.
+1000
I mean, can anyone think of a reason why not??!?
Yes.I am anti-registering, male or female. I don't think anyone should have to fight some government's stupid war.
A guy I knew got out of the military because he was a conscientious objector. But he still had to register. Pretty sure the law requires it regardless of one's views on fighting the government's "stupid war."
Anonymous wrote:Yes they should.
It's about time we had mandatory civil service (a year or two) from everyone in this country. Everyone should have skin in the game and it doesn't have to be direct combat. You can object and sit out but then you don't qualify for fha loans or federal student loans etc.
Anonymous wrote:There is no draft
Anonymous wrote:And we as a citizenry need to "have more skin in the game," so women should register and both men and women should be subject to the draft. It will be harder to go to war if everyone's children have to go. I'm sick and tired of all these "chicken hawks" who are so in favor of war but never had to serve.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I doubt they would change the policy. We're a huge country and we have more than enough men on the draft rolls currently to field a very large force. They'd also have to think about what happens if they draft both the mom and dad to young children? Previously just the dad got drafted.
I think all it would take is a lawsuit from some young man to make this happen.
If all positions are open to females, why not have them register.
It’s only fair.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Since we haven't had a draft in 40 years - doubt we'd start now. But, yes, theoretically, there is no reason why girls shouldn't sign up for selective service. Although perhaps the child-bearing aspect of sending young girls off to fight and then not having anyone home to continue the species - but then I read WAY to many dystopic/sci-fi books.
Don’t quite understand your thinking. It takes two to continue the species - female AND male.
One man can impregnate hundreds. One woman can only have a small number of children.
Women have to have some skin in the game. Why should women be allowed to vote on sending just the men to fight and die?
Anonymous wrote:(So maybe I'll revise my answer and say DD should have to register when women make a dollar on a man's dollar in the workforce...)
Plus 100 to this! I don't think our daughters should register and this is the main reason why. When males and females are truly treated equally then we can talk about registering females. Until then NO WAY
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Woman of two daughters here and I say yes as well. i think that bootcamp and some military service will do our daughters a lot of good.
Does this good include hand to hand combat with ISIS or similar Neanderthal minded enemies in a urban or jungle setting? Crawling in the mud in fox holes alongside men with incoming mortar fire? With the new rules, combat is not an option but an obligation just like for the men, especially in the event of a draft. Careful what you wish for.
Any woman who can get through basis training can engage in combat. So to answer your question, yes!
And of course you are ok with the way the all young, militant, chauvinistic male enemy will treat the 50% young woman soldiers who may end up as POWs, like perhaps your daughter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Woman of two daughters here and I say yes as well. i think that bootcamp and some military service will do our daughters a lot of good.
Does this good include hand to hand combat with ISIS or similar Neanderthal minded enemies in a urban or jungle setting? Crawling in the mud in fox holes alongside men with incoming mortar fire? With the new rules, combat is not an option but an obligation just like for the men, especially in the event of a draft. Careful what you wish for.
Any woman who can get through basis training can engage in combat. So to answer your question, yes!
Anonymous wrote:The Navy has had experience with women on battleships. So many of them come down pregnant that it degrades readiness.
Anonymous wrote:The Navy has had experience with women on battleships. So many of them come down pregnant that it degrades readiness.