Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here - yes, this is what I want for my twins, see below from PP. I do not need diversity by all means just for the sake of diversity, we encounter plenty of that anyway. I want a good school, good teachers, serious/ambitious kids, committed parents, good role models, kids and families with whom we can have a relationship after school as well, in our neighborhood. This is not about race, but about quality. I don't care what your color, religion or background is. Also, I would not want to send them to a 99% hispanic school, since that is not our culture and language, so what's the point. I just want the best for them, according to what my value system is and what I believe is best for them and for us as a family. I want the best that this country has to offer for my kids - make my tax dollars work!
NP here and so what? Sadly, the demographics tend to show the school's ability. Are you saying we should all want to go to Wheaton Regional instead of Whitman because it is more diverse even though the drop out rate is higher, the test scores are lower and there are more police calls/arrests there? If we prefer Whitman, we are racist?
I want my kids to go to the best school with kids that want to be there and learn. That get good grades and test scores. Families that take it seriously. I would send my kid to a 99% hispanic school if it was the highest rated, but guess what? There aren't any.
Anonymous wrote:OP here - yes, this is what I want for my twins, see below from PP. I do not need diversity by all means just for the sake of diversity, we encounter plenty of that anyway. I want a good school, good teachers, serious/ambitious kids, committed parents, good role models, kids and families with whom we can have a relationship after school as well, in our neighborhood. This is not about race, but about quality. I don't care what your color, religion or background is. Also, I would not want to send them to a 99% hispanic school, since that is not our culture and language, so what's the point. I just want the best for them, according to what my value system is and what I believe is best for them and for us as a family. I want the best that this country has to offer for my kids - make my tax dollars work!
NP here and so what? Sadly, the demographics tend to show the school's ability. Are you saying we should all want to go to Wheaton Regional instead of Whitman because it is more diverse even though the drop out rate is higher, the test scores are lower and there are more police calls/arrests there? If we prefer Whitman, we are racist?
I want my kids to go to the best school with kids that want to be there and learn. That get good grades and test scores. Families that take it seriously. I would send my kid to a 99% hispanic school if it was the highest rated, but guess what? There aren't any.
Anonymous wrote:OP - moving from NW to DC for MCPS schools was the worst decision that we ever made. We sunk too much into a house that has barely appreciated in value. Even though we are in the magic "W" cluster, the curriculum has gone down the drain. Math is horrible. We should have stayed in JKLM and decided to in middle or high school to move to VA or go private.
Special needs pretty much sucks everywhere but MCPS is more understaffed. Special needs instructors, para educators, and the positions that support kids with special needs are gone now. ESL and salary increases for MCPS staff have absorbed what little there was available in the past. At our school the one special needs teacher end up doing more general work -reading and math assessments for compacted math, staff development, covering when a teacher has a meeting- then working with the special needs kids. She's as frustrated as the parents but this is MCPS - no accountability.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The point is, many of the facts about a school that make it "good" or "bad" are not reflected in test scores.
No, that's really what makes the "school" good or bad. It all boils down to grades and achievement. Everything else is detail.
Yes, teaching is irrelevant. Attitudes toward school and learning are also irrelevant. Also irrelevant is anything that doesn't involve grades, test scores, or awards. Grades and "achievement" are the only things that matter.
(I don't actually believe this.)
Erm, no, that is not what I meant at all. In order for the grades and achievement to be good, you will automatically need to have excellent teachers and a strong curriculum, conscientious students and involved parents.
How else do you think these schools get the good results?
What is superfluous, is teenage pregnancy, anorexia and various other PERSONAL issues which are actually none of your fucking business.
Anonymous wrote:
Newsflash. Test scores = grades and achievement. Do I really have to spell out to you that I'm not talking about report cards? Are you completely stupid?