Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. And no one I know around here does
That's what they tell you. You would never suspect our family does. And yet, we do.
Anonymous wrote:If I teach them it's not OK to hit, never to hit, as a child or as an adult...
Why would I hit them?
Anonymous wrote:No. And no one I know around here does
Anonymous wrote:Yes, we spank. It works for our family. It's they calm, measured soanking. Never in anger.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would I hit my child...call it what it is: hitting. I'd never hit my child. It's ineffective as a disciplinary tool, since discipline means to teachie to help your child understand the right way to behave. Hitting them does not teach them the right way to behave; it just teaches them what not to do to avoid getting hit.
If that were the only thing you do, then you'd be right. Since it's just the punishment portion, it works well as a complement to the teaching aspect. Same as any other punishment, only more effective. If all you ever did was to take away toys and issue timeouts, that wouldn't work, either.
Except a lot of people don't incorporate a teaching component with their punishment. And, if you are an effective teacher in teaching them how to behave, you don't need to hit them as well to get your point across. There are other, better ways to teach your kids how to behave that they can actually learn and grow from instead of blocking out whatever teaching you are trying to do because they are too sidetracked by the fact that you just or are about to HIT them.
You can teach them after the spanking. Memory of the spanking will reinforce the teaching.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would I hit my child...call it what it is: hitting. I'd never hit my child. It's ineffective as a disciplinary tool, since discipline means to teachie to help your child understand the right way to behave. Hitting them does not teach them the right way to behave; it just teaches them what not to do to avoid getting hit.
If that were the only thing you do, then you'd be right. Since it's just the punishment portion, it works well as a complement to the teaching aspect. Same as any other punishment, only more effective. If all you ever did was to take away toys and issue timeouts, that wouldn't work, either.
Except a lot of people don't incorporate a teaching component with their punishment. And, if you are an effective teacher in teaching them how to behave, you don't need to hit them as well to get your point across. There are other, better ways to teach your kids how to behave that they can actually learn and grow from instead of blocking out whatever teaching you are trying to do because they are too sidetracked by the fact that you just or are about to HIT them.
Correct, a lot of people don't. A lot just put their kids in timeout and never teach anything. But even people who do teach proper behavior find that they sometimes need to reinforce that with a punishment, whatever form that may take.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have swatted their bottoms -twins - because I had warned them to never ever put pills in their mouths if they found one on the floor. My mum was staying with us and, because of her bad eye sight, she'd sometimes miss her mouth and her pill would drop to the floor without her realizing. She was on some heavy duty medication - blood pressure, dementia, heart meds and I lived in terror of them eating them.
I tried to always be there to make sure they all went in her mouth but she'd forget and take them again. I am also on BP meds so the danger wasn't going to end when my mum left.
One day I found my twins huddled in the play room and went to see what they were up to. They were about 3. They were taking it in turns to taste a pill they had found on the floor. Thank God it was just a vitamin pill but it could have been so much worse.
I had a talk with them and gave each 1 swat in the bottom telling them never to do it again and how dangerous it was. I was more scared than angry ( almost in tears before I realized it was only a vitamin) and I think they realized that and finally understood the severity of the "crime". After that, every time they saw a pill (my mum stayed for 3 months) they'd bring it to me saying "we're not allowed to eat these because they are very dangerous".
I do not regret it one bit.
You physically assaulted your children because you and your mother are too lazy to not leave pills laying around? Unbelievable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would I hit my child...call it what it is: hitting. I'd never hit my child. It's ineffective as a disciplinary tool, since discipline means to teachie to help your child understand the right way to behave. Hitting them does not teach them the right way to behave; it just teaches them what not to do to avoid getting hit.
If that were the only thing you do, then you'd be right. Since it's just the punishment portion, it works well as a complement to the teaching aspect. Same as any other punishment, only more effective. If all you ever did was to take away toys and issue timeouts, that wouldn't work, either.
Except a lot of people don't incorporate a teaching component with their punishment. And, if you are an effective teacher in teaching them how to behave, you don't need to hit them as well to get your point across. There are other, better ways to teach your kids how to behave that they can actually learn and grow from instead of blocking out whatever teaching you are trying to do because they are too sidetracked by the fact that you just or are about to HIT them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would I hit my child...call it what it is: hitting. I'd never hit my child. It's ineffective as a disciplinary tool, since discipline means to teachie to help your child understand the right way to behave. Hitting them does not teach them the right way to behave; it just teaches them what not to do to avoid getting hit.
If that were the only thing you do, then you'd be right. Since it's just the punishment portion, it works well as a complement to the teaching aspect. Same as any other punishment, only more effective. If all you ever did was to take away toys and issue timeouts, that wouldn't work, either.
Except a lot of people don't incorporate a teaching component with their punishment. And, if you are an effective teacher in teaching them how to behave, you don't need to hit them as well to get your point across. There are other, better ways to teach your kids how to behave that they can actually learn and grow from instead of blocking out whatever teaching you are trying to do because they are too sidetracked by the fact that you just or are about to HIT them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would I hit my child...call it what it is: hitting. I'd never hit my child. It's ineffective as a disciplinary tool, since discipline means to teachie to help your child understand the right way to behave. Hitting them does not teach them the right way to behave; it just teaches them what not to do to avoid getting hit.
If that were the only thing you do, then you'd be right. Since it's just the punishment portion, it works well as a complement to the teaching aspect. Same as any other punishment, only more effective. If all you ever did was to take away toys and issue timeouts, that wouldn't work, either.