Anonymous wrote:I'm white, college educated and 40.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fox has the best news ratings with something like 13% of all news viewers. CNN is second with around 10%. The rest is spread among all the other networks. Basically 87% of people do not watch Fox. Yes it is number one but only because the ratings are so fragmented.
Liberals are far more likely to get their news from a whole variety of sources, whereas the hardcore conservative has been propagandized into believing you can't trust any other sources (i.e. anything other than FOX is 'lamestream liberal media' or even more comically, 'state run media' as though Obama has armband wearing News Komissars sitting at the editorial desks of every news outlet except for FOX), thus they only get their news from FOX.
This kind of idiocy is why Jade Helm 15 is a thing.
Anonymous wrote:I don't know that this was true a few decades ago but now it seems that every Republican is white and retired (and a little bitter) or white with only a high school diploma or less.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am highly educated and 54. I'm sure I'm 'old' to millenials, but age simply means that I've lived long enough to understand how liberal policies, too much government interference, and the PC police affect our personal freedoms.
If given the choice between free choice and an easy life via government control, I choose freedom every time. When you work for something, you appreciate it that much more.
Uh, yeah, because only conservatives work for what they have
</sarcasm>
And, "PC police?" Puh-leeze. You might as well make this your avatar:
When you answer with an image and sarcasm, it's not really an intelligent response.
Did I say ONLY conservatives work for what they have? No. That was an assumption you made. Also, not a very intelligent response.
I'm sorry I blew up the 'republicans have no education' theory. Have a beer. You'll feel better.
LOL The image is a pictorial of the average Republican and you know it. The truth hurts.
This is the pictorial image of Republicans in liberal heads. The fact that y'all use cartoons so much rather than your words speaks volumes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fox has the best news ratings with something like 13% of all news viewers. CNN is second with around 10%. The rest is spread among all the other networks. Basically 87% of people do not watch Fox. Yes it is number one but only because the ratings are so fragmented.
Liberals are far more likely to get their news from a whole variety of sources, whereas the hardcore conservative has been propagandized into believing you can't trust any other sources (i.e. anything other than FOX is 'lamestream liberal media' or even more comically, 'state run media' as though Obama has armband wearing News Komissars sitting at the editorial desks of every news outlet except for FOX), thus they only get their news from FOX.
This kind of idiocy is why Jade Helm 15 is a thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am highly educated and 54. I'm sure I'm 'old' to millenials, but age simply means that I've lived long enough to understand how liberal policies, too much government interference, and the PC police affect our personal freedoms.
If given the choice between free choice and an easy life via government control, I choose freedom every time. When you work for something, you appreciate it that much more.
Uh, yeah, because only conservatives work for what they have
</sarcasm>
And, "PC police?" Puh-leeze. You might as well make this your avatar:
When you answer with an image and sarcasm, it's not really an intelligent response.
Did I say ONLY conservatives work for what they have? No. That was an assumption you made. Also, not a very intelligent response.
I'm sorry I blew up the 'republicans have no education' theory. Have a beer. You'll feel better.
LOL The image is a pictorial of the average Republican and you know it. The truth hurts.
Anonymous wrote:Fox has the best news ratings with something like 13% of all news viewers. CNN is second with around 10%. The rest is spread among all the other networks. Basically 87% of people do not watch Fox. Yes it is number one but only because the ratings are so fragmented.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ So, which is it, Liberals?
Is the Republican party really dying off with very few Republicans left - as many on this site have proclaimed?
If so, how do you explain the ratings for the O’Reilly Factor (and the other prime time Fox shows)?
If only the “dying-off Republicans” were viewing Fox, its ratings would not be nearly as high as they are.
So, if Republicans are becoming extinct, then there must be a lot of people from other parties watching Fox.
Or, might it be that the Republican party is not dying off. Perhaps there are more Republicans and right-leaning people out there.
Either the Republican party and right-leaning voters are growing in numbers, or, a variety of people from various political parties is watching Fox.
Or, a third choice....
Maybe people actually enjoy watching Fox because it is the one network that provides all sides of an issue.
Actually it makes perfect sense, and there's no contradiction. Retirees have plenty of time to sit on their fat asses and watch FOX while the rest of us are too busy for TV, because we are busting our humps, taking care of our kids, families, et cetera.
And FOX providing "all sides of an issue?" HAHAHAHA! Boy oh boy are you ever DELUSIONAL. Their scant handful of token so-called "liberals" like Juan Williams do not at all touch on most issues, do not speak for most liberals, and only lob softballs rather than actually providing a solid or legitimate counterpoint.
Do you actually watch fox news to know for yourself or just go by soundbites that are taken out of context?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ So, which is it, Liberals?
Is the Republican party really dying off with very few Republicans left - as many on this site have proclaimed?
If so, how do you explain the ratings for the O’Reilly Factor (and the other prime time Fox shows)?
If only the “dying-off Republicans” were viewing Fox, its ratings would not be nearly as high as they are.
So, if Republicans are becoming extinct, then there must be a lot of people from other parties watching Fox.
Or, might it be that the Republican party is not dying off. Perhaps there are more Republicans and right-leaning people out there.
Either the Republican party and right-leaning voters are growing in numbers, or, a variety of people from various political parties is watching Fox.
Or, a third choice....
Maybe people actually enjoy watching Fox because it is the one network that provides all sides of an issue.
Actually it makes perfect sense, and there's no contradiction. Retirees have plenty of time to sit on their fat asses and watch FOX while the rest of us are too busy for TV, because we are busting our humps, taking care of our kids, families, et cetera.
And FOX providing "all sides of an issue?" HAHAHAHA! Boy oh boy are you ever DELUSIONAL. Their scant handful of token so-called "liberals" like Juan Williams do not at all touch on most issues, do not speak for most liberals, and only lob softballs rather than actually providing a solid or legitimate counterpoint.
Anonymous wrote:^^ So, which is it, Liberals?
Is the Republican party really dying off with very few Republicans left - as many on this site have proclaimed?
If so, how do you explain the ratings for the O’Reilly Factor (and the other prime time Fox shows)?
If only the “dying-off Republicans” were viewing Fox, its ratings would not be nearly as high as they are.
So, if Republicans are becoming extinct, then there must be a lot of people from other parties watching Fox.
Or, might it be that the Republican party is not dying off. Perhaps there are more Republicans and right-leaning people out there.
Either the Republican party and right-leaning voters are growing in numbers, or, a variety of people from various political parties is watching Fox.
Or, a third choice....
Maybe people actually enjoy watching Fox because it is the one network that provides all sides of an issue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ Not pp.
If you have to explain that something is sarcasm, it is a pretty poor attempt at it, dear.
NP and not true at all. Most Republicans need everything spelled out for them - it is the product of lesser education and intelligence. Had PP not told you it was sarcasm, Dear, you never would have taken her post literally.
Anonymous wrote:^^ Not pp.
If you have to explain that something is sarcasm, it is a pretty poor attempt at it, dear.