Most boring people in the world must be the ones who live in dcAnonymous wrote:We are talking about the actual definition vs the DCUM definition.
In DCUM terms, it is anywhere but DC, 'Close In' MC, and if they hold their nose - North Arlington
If you own two or cars, live in a house larger than 3000SF or built after 1957, don't ride the metro, don't shop exclusively at Whole Foods, don't consider an afternoon at the museums fun entertainment and let your kids watch TV - it is highly likely that you live in an 'exurb' where there is little or no intelligent life.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I honestly consider anything outside the beltway to be more exurb than suburban. I consider the palisades and spring valley and close in Bethesda to be suburban.
This: any where people snicker when people claim to be from Dc but the area has no real tie other than it doesn't have enough jobs of its own some people commute is an exurb. If you claim DC when travling but live outside the beltway you are kind of kidding yourself if not out right lying.
This makes no sense because there are places outside the beltway closer to metro than areas inside the beltway. Tyson's is outside the beltway, but isn't an exurb. I don't think 495 is some magical divider of what areas have some sort of "tie" to the DC area. You sound insecure and like you're trying to make yourself seem somehow superior, but no one cares.
Your argument makes little sense. While Tyson's could be considered it own town doesn't mean is is part of DC. Tyson's is the edge of the proper suburbs at best
Anonymous wrote:
People may move to the burbs for "safety reasons, but that's because people are terrible at evaluating risk. The suburbs are considerably more dangerous than the city. While they're fretting about getting mugged in the city their kids are killing themselves in traffic in the burbs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I honestly consider anything outside the beltway to be more exurb than suburban. I consider the palisades and spring valley and close in Bethesda to be suburban.
This: any where people snicker when people claim to be from Dc but the area has no real tie other than it doesn't have enough jobs of its own some people commute is an exurb. If you claim DC when travling but live outside the beltway you are kind of kidding yourself if not out right lying.
This makes no sense because there are places outside the beltway closer to metro than areas inside the beltway. Tyson's is outside the beltway, but isn't an exurb. I don't think 495 is some magical divider of what areas have some sort of "tie" to the DC area. You sound insecure and like you're trying to make yourself seem somehow superior, but no one cares.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about Maryland? Is Olney and exurb? Gaithersburg?
I wouldn't consider Olney or Gaithersburg exurbs. Clarksburg definitely, and maybe Germantown or Burtonsville.
Burtonsville?
It's close to Ho Co and not that far from Baltimore. It's right around 29, and 198 takes you to 95 in minutes.
You do realize that towns around major highways aren't really that "far out."
Once people start fleeing the cities, these exurbs will no longer exist. Howard was farmland years ago, with the exception of Columbia - not so true now. same could be said for Olney
You can't stop development.
You're right, I meant Laytonsville. Not Burtonsville, which is much closer in.
Defining exurbs is funny. Ellicott City may seem to be an exurb to DC folks, but it's not a bad commute to Baltimore.
It's all relative, I guess.
This site is DC-centric.
btw - I love Laytonsville. not a fan of the schools - But the area is beautiful. And yes, it's an exurb by DC standards.
Well, yeah. It's called DCUM.
my point being that as development continues, people will move farther out for several reasons - schools, safety, less congestion, land
So DC won't be as "centric."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about Maryland? Is Olney and exurb? Gaithersburg?
I wouldn't consider Olney or Gaithersburg exurbs. Clarksburg definitely, and maybe Germantown or Burtonsville.
It's funny because Burtonsville is only slightly farther out than Rockville. The southern half of Burtonsville is the same distance from DC and the beltway as the northern half of Rockville. And virtually all of Burtonsville is closer to DC than Gaithersburg.
You have to drive 10 miles to get to a metro from Burtonsville. So Burtonsville may not be much farther in terms of mileage, but in terms of time/ability to get to DC, it's way farther than even northern Rockville (downtown in 30 mins, regardless of traffic, via metro).
Anonymous wrote:Definitely Leesburg. Maybe even Stafford.
In MD, it's tougher because Frederick Co. residents tend to associate more with Frederick Co.; although that's changed and is still changing. In the next 5-10 years, it will probably considered a solid exurb.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I honestly consider anything outside the beltway to be more exurb than suburban. I consider the palisades and spring valley and close in Bethesda to be suburban.
This: any where people snicker when people claim to be from Dc but the area has no real tie other than it doesn't have enough jobs of its own some people commute is an exurb. If you claim DC when travling but live outside the beltway you are kind of kidding yourself if not out right lying.
Anonymous wrote:I honestly consider anything outside the beltway to be more exurb than suburban. I consider the palisades and spring valley and close in Bethesda to be suburban.
Anonymous wrote:Interesting, I live in dc and still consider great falls and centreville suburbs.
I'd consider Leesburg or Manassass to be exurbs. Maybe Frederick. An exurb is such that the population identifies more with their town than the large city they commute to.