Anonymous wrote:Dieting, cigs, and sun. She looks a decade older than 33 as a result but, as others have said, has lots of good points to work with (smile, hair, lean frame, nice legs).
Anonymous wrote:she needs less eyeliner, but other than that, she looks like a 33 year old who has not had botox or fillers and is photographed constantly without filters in harsh light. I am sure if we all were subjected to the same, we would look worse.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not sure what this nonsense is about the bad genetic lottery. There is so much crap about aging and how white women look so terrible because oooo, so old looking. It is such discrimination and would not be appropriate, obviously, if directed toward other races - like, oh no, Ghanaian women, such awful old looking hair. Wtf? She is pretty. She clearly actually lucked out on the gene front.
Her mother is gorgeous and elegant. They have great legs. I do not see women out and about in DC on a regular basis that look as good as her. Clearly most of you have insanely deluded ideas about how hot/young you are, as seen on here on a regular basis. You are all legends in your own minds. But I don't think you are getting by on your smoking hot looks so seriously - tone it down.
+1
This thread is ridiculous .Sounds like some Kardashians fans on this thread.
Anonymous wrote:I am not sure what this nonsense is about the bad genetic lottery. There is so much crap about aging and how white women look so terrible because oooo, so old looking. It is such discrimination and would not be appropriate, obviously, if directed toward other races - like, oh no, Ghanaian women, such awful old looking hair. Wtf? She is pretty. She clearly actually lucked out on the gene front.
Her mother is gorgeous and elegant. They have great legs. I do not see women out and about in DC on a regular basis that look as good as her. Clearly most of you have insanely deluded ideas about how hot/young you are, as seen on here on a regular basis. You are all legends in your own minds. But I don't think you are getting by on your smoking hot looks so seriously - tone it down.
Anonymous wrote:I am not sure what this nonsense is about the bad genetic lottery. There is so much crap about aging and how white women look so terrible because oooo, so old looking. It is such discrimination and would not be appropriate, obviously, if directed toward other races - like, oh no, Ghanaian women, such awful old looking hair. Wtf? She is pretty. She clearly actually lucked out on the gene front.
Her mother is gorgeous and elegant. They have great legs. I do not see women out and about in DC on a regular basis that look as good as her. Clearly most of you have insanely deluded ideas about how hot/young you are, as seen on here on a regular basis. You are all legends in your own minds. But I don't think you are getting by on your smoking hot looks so seriously - tone it down.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She's British, very thin, has had two kids, and is mid-30s. She looks exactly how I would expect.
+1. That fair, delicate British skin is lovely when we're kids but not so much after childbearing and entering middle age. Sigh.
Yes. She did not win the genetic lottery so she is aging as expected.
But that hair and makeup need updating. The hot-rollered hair especially looks ridiculous on a mid-30s mother.