Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op here. Heard that tears/issues down below can be just as difficult as c section recovery. Any truth to that?
Yes. Ask most woman OBs how they gave birth and you might be surprised that most chose elective Cs.
This is so they can schedule them.
OP in general, that's not the case. Only if you tear pretty badly
Anonymous wrote:My sister regretted her vbac. Her baby was large and late and she tore pretty badly. She had to get the tear corrected a bit a week PP. Since her VBAC also now pees a little when she jogs or sneezes, so it weakened her pelvic floor too in a way that the pregnancies and c section hadn't. For her third, she opted for a c section and has no regrets.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op here. Heard that tears/issues down below can be just as difficult as c section recovery. Any truth to that?
Yes. Ask most woman OBs how they gave birth and you might be surprised that most chose elective Cs.
Anonymous wrote:Op here. Heard that tears/issues down below can be just as difficult as c section recovery. Any truth to that?
Anonymous wrote:You'd regret it if you ruptured or had a horrible shoulder dystocia or were ripped from stem to stern with forceps.
Unfortunately, you can't know any of this in advance. How badly do you want vaginal birth?
I'd never attempt a VBAC without an OB and continuous fetal monitoring in an excellent hospital with a NICU.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think most VBAC recoveries are much better than CS recoveries, particularly if your labored before your CS. Of course there are exceptions. I loved my VBAC and am about to have another. But, I was emotionally wounded by my CS so I had a lot invested in the VBAC. If it hadn't happened, I think it would have been a very bad scene for my mental health. Doesn't mean it wasn't worth the shot, but it was a scary risk to take.
Is this true for scheduled Cs? I had a wonderful scheduled C recovery for breech baby and am worried about it being worse after VBAC!
The problem is no one knows. You could have a lovely, fast delivery with minimal tearing, etc and be pretty much back to yourself within a week or two (this is most of my friends' experience). Or, you could have a long painful labor and third (or fourth) degree tears, shoulder dystocia, etc. For most women, it's worth trying because you might end up in group #1, but for some the risk of a difficult vaginal delivery may be outweighed by a relatively routine scheduled c/s. Only your doc can really advise you and depends on how much you want the vbac.
Anonymous wrote:Is there anyone on this thread whose C/S was the result of failure to dilate due to cervical scarring? Meaning, I labored, was fully effaced, baby was fully down, but cervix would not dilate without hemostat due to scarring from earlier procedure. I went from home birth to hospital to emergency C/S under general. Trying to assess if dilation might be possible in future pregnancy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op here. Heard that tears/issues down below can be just as difficult as c section recovery. Any truth to that?
I had a quick recovery from my csection. My sister was in pain for over a year from her vaginal birth (ended up having to get restitched).
I had a 2nd degree tear (so not even that bad) and 5 years later, have had a lot of issues, including fecal incontinence. If I had known, I would've gone for the C-section in a heartbeat. But I couldn't have known beforehand...
Do you have prolapse? This is probably from pregnancy too, not just the actual birth.
No, I don't.