Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NNAT 133
CogAT 116
GBRS 16
In pool.
In.
the one and only 16 so far
That was my DD. I will say, her teacher put A LOT of effort into that GBRS report. She included very specific examples of behaviors/acts in the classroom and out (like at recess). I knew about some of these things, but not about others. It was an interesting read, and more information about my child than I've gotten (albeit indirectly) from any of my kids' teachers so far. I would recommend to anyone who had a packet prepared to request a copy.
My DD got a 16 last year, too. It contained about 4 pages of singled spaced typed commentary. I was shocked at the details provided. It covered nearly all aspects of her day, things she says, quotes she'd said, how she handled situations, questions she asked, answers she provided, etc. EXTREMELY detailed.
Can you tell us what school your child attends. I'm pretty sure the teachers at our school don't put in nearly that effort. Great teacher whoever she/he is!
Seriously, I want to know, too. My DC's teacher gave one sentence each for his resport. I feel she doesn't care or know so much about my kid.
Anonymous wrote:NNat 142
CoGat composite 138
In pool with Gbrs unknown but did not get in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please explain to me why my DS with a CoGat composite of 148 and a NNat of 145 did not get in. I don't know the GBRS but those scores should have been sufficient. We are very unhappy with this and considering our options.
I'm very sorry, PP, I also would not understand. I guess doing WISC and understanding GBRS is the way to go.
A similar situation was posted on a different thread , with strong NNAT, CoGAT , and I think GBRS 9 and got denied the GBRS . From the stat that people reported so far ( and assuming people are truthfully did so)I have to say that GBRS is a very important criteria, if not THE most important when the committee consider the whole package. Unfortunately, GBRS is very subjective in my opinion, and different from school to school, teacher to teacher. It looks like they emphasize the history of gifted behavior in one and a half year (first and second half of second grade) to predict how well the child will do in AAP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please explain to me why my DS with a CoGat composite of 148 and a NNat of 145 did not get in. I don't know the GBRS but those scores should have been sufficient. We are very unhappy with this and considering our options.
I'm very sorry, PP, I also would not understand. I guess doing WISC and understanding GBRS is the way to go.
Anonymous wrote:CoGat was 128 and Naglierii from garde one was 140. The Gbrs were 14 but my dad did not get in. I am beside myself and very perplexed...
Anonymous wrote:Please explain to me why my DS with a CoGat composite of 148 and a NNat of 145 did not get in. I don't know the GBRS but those scores should have been sufficient. We are very unhappy with this and considering our options.
Anonymous wrote:Please explain to me why my DS with a CoGat composite of 148 and a NNat of 145 did not get in. I don't know the GBRS but those scores should have been sufficient. We are very unhappy with this and considering our options.
Anonymous wrote:Please explain to me why my DS with a CoGat composite of 148 and a NNat of 145 did not get in. I don't know the GBRS but those scores should have been sufficient. We are very unhappy with this and considering our options.