Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Property values will remain just fine in the Brent District even with no viable MS feed. If anything, they will continue to rise as development progresses south of the Freeway (e.g., Whole Foods, etc.) i haven't seen any suppression of prices of homes IB for schools like LT at which high-SES families have eschewed except for PK. I mean, seriously, take a look at prices for homes IB for Tyler or Payne. Location, location, location.
That's hilarious. Are you aware that a Whole Foods is going to open 2 blocks north of LT? You know, right down the street from the new Giant. And the other new massive mixed use. And have you looked at the IB numbers for LT for 1st? or 2nd? Brent is a great school and a great neighborhood. But are you aware there are other neighborhoods that are on an upswing? I do agree that the real estate will always be available...all those Brent families need to sell after 5th grade!
??? No Brent parent will ever need to sell. Brent is the feeder for Latin and Basis. Brent will take all of the seats thru sibling preference. It's the other Hill schools who have to worry about the lack of MS option.
I just checked the myschooldc website and you should call them. It doesn't list "Brent Families" under Lottery preferences. Neither does Latin! Just sibling. So that means that the people who have kids there won't have to sell, but your neighbors are calling realtors as I type. Unless sibling has a different meaning IB for Brent. Does it? Please illuminate the meaning in that rarified air.
You're making my argument for me. As a Brent booster/apologist the best defense for the atrocious feeder situation is...families that already have kids in a charter won't be harmed. I guess their's no "I" in Brent. I wouldn't know because neither my kids nor I were educated at Brent.
How long have you lived here? You seem out of touch. No, Brent is not a literal feeder to Latin or Basis. No, Brent families are not calling their realtors, unless it is to make a mint off of their million dollar houses.
I get that Capitol Hill is expensive all over, and I can understand why you might have a Brent chip on your shoulder if you bought an expensive house in bounds for a school like Ludlow-Taylor without realizing that all schools on the Hill are not yet on equal footing.
Not on equal footing? You're right, LT has higher CAS scores than Brent. Apparently the teacher quality is pretty equal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Congratulations on being content with a bad situation.
The reality is that people are not going to move from Capitol Hill. The interest rates were very low when the many of us late-comers came to the table. We paid a lot for our homes and are not okay with the middle schools staying so-so. So your idea that it's over is wrong.
Just because I have decidedcto accept a bad situation doesn't mean I am okay with it. Many of us tried to fight the middle school battle several years ago, whether openly or behind the scenes. In the end, there is no consensus on the Hill. Henderson, DCPS and Tommy Wells took their cues from CHPSPO, which was dominated by the Cluster. Brent was effectively told to go f@#k itself and be happy with a dual feed to Jefferson and Eliot-Hine. DCPS is good at making promises. The follow through is what is lacking. Thankfully, charters solved the conundrum for many of us. Mis it any wonder that with the exception of Brent and Maury, Capitol Hill Elementaries continue to be majority OOB by a wide margin.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Property values will remain just fine in the Brent District even with no viable MS feed. If anything, they will continue to rise as development progresses south of the Freeway (e.g., Whole Foods, etc.) i haven't seen any suppression of prices of homes IB for schools like LT at which high-SES families have eschewed except for PK. I mean, seriously, take a look at prices for homes IB for Tyler or Payne. Location, location, location.
That's hilarious. Are you aware that a Whole Foods is going to open 2 blocks north of LT? You know, right down the street from the new Giant. And the other new massive mixed use. And have you looked at the IB numbers for LT for 1st? or 2nd? Brent is a great school and a great neighborhood. But are you aware there are other neighborhoods that are on an upswing? I do agree that the real estate will always be available...all those Brent families need to sell after 5th grade!
??? No Brent parent will ever need to sell. Brent is the feeder for Latin and Basis. Brent will take all of the seats thru sibling preference. It's the other Hill schools who have to worry about the lack of MS option.
I just checked the myschooldc website and you should call them. It doesn't list "Brent Families" under Lottery preferences. Neither does Latin! Just sibling. So that means that the people who have kids there won't have to sell, but your neighbors are calling realtors as I type. Unless sibling has a different meaning IB for Brent. Does it? Please illuminate the meaning in that rarified air.
You're making my argument for me. As a Brent booster/apologist the best defense for the atrocious feeder situation is...families that already have kids in a charter won't be harmed. I guess their's no "I" in Brent. I wouldn't know because neither my kids nor I were educated at Brent.
How long have you lived here? You seem out of touch. No, Brent is not a literal feeder to Latin or Basis. No, Brent families are not calling their realtors, unless it is to make a mint off of their million dollar houses.
I get that Capitol Hill is expensive all over, and I can understand why you might have a Brent chip on your shoulder if you bought an expensive house in bounds for a school like Ludlow-Taylor without realizing that all schools on the Hill are not yet on equal footing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Congratulations on being content with a bad situation.
The reality is that people are not going to move from Capitol Hill. The interest rates were very low when the many of us late-comers came to the table. We paid a lot for our homes and are not okay with the middle schools staying so-so. So your idea that it's over is wrong.
It's not ok for the students there now or for future students. So what's your plan?
Anonymous wrote:Congratulations on being content with a bad situation.
The reality is that people are not going to move from Capitol Hill. The interest rates were very low when the many of us late-comers came to the table. We paid a lot for our homes and are not okay with the middle schools staying so-so. So your idea that it's over is wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Congratulations on being content with a bad situation.
The reality is that people are not going to move from Capitol Hill. The interest rates were very low when the many of us late-comers came to the table. We paid a lot for our homes and are not okay with the middle schools staying so-so. So your idea that it's over is wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Thanks for speaking truth to power, or whatever it is you think you are trying to accomplish.
+1. I thought it was just upper NW posters who were bitter about how good Brent is now.
Yes. Most of DC (and especially upper NW with their top ranked ES that feeds into Deal that feeds into Wilson) are bitter about Brent. Excellent point. Also, good on you for knowing that Brent=power. I would love to see the other people in your neighborhood cringe every time another one of these retorts is typed.
P.S. You guys actually put those words down on paper. I didn't even have to paraphrase! Best entertainment ever.