Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A couple of things, OP.
1. Say no. You're the breadwinner, the responsibility and risk would be on you to pay this mortgage. If you don't want to do it, then don't. Pouting won't change things. Can your husband really pay the mortgage by himself?
2. I'm concerned about your relationship with your husband. You two should be a team, not him with his parents against you!
I'm a stay-at-home mother with no income. DH still includes my opinions into all the financial decisions and has never made one that does not benefit me.
I don't think OP is the only breadwinner, PP. I believe she just said she earns more than her husband.
Ok, then she is the *primary* breadwinner.
How does that change PP's points?
Look at it this way, OP: A bank will not loan them the money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A couple of things, OP.
1. Say no. You're the breadwinner, the responsibility and risk would be on you to pay this mortgage. If you don't want to do it, then don't. Pouting won't change things. Can your husband really pay the mortgage by himself?
2. I'm concerned about your relationship with your husband. You two should be a team, not him with his parents against you!
I'm a stay-at-home mother with no income. DH still includes my opinions into all the financial decisions and has never made one that does not benefit me.
I don't think OP is the only breadwinner, PP. I believe she just said she earns more than her husband.
Anonymous wrote:It might also be worth having a frank conversation with your DH about how much you plan/want to support your parents (yours too, not just his) and budgeting accordingly. This kind of open-ended plan he has in mind for his parents is not good.
Anonymous wrote:The $500k makes the picture a bit clearer. That is not much for a retired couple in their 60s who want a nice house in C'ville with only $200k equity in their current home (and that's a maybe - you don't know if they've borrowed against it).
A plausible scenario is that your ILs, averse to debt or not, simply can't qualify for the home loan on the fixed income they have. And DH and FIL don't want to admit this to you to 1) help FIL save face and 2) lock you into a long-term support plan. The "investment" angle is a smokescreen. Whether ILs were poor savers, made bad investments, or overspent, they clearly can't afford to buy the home they want in Charlottesville, and trying to make it happen on the backs of you and your DH without your consent is wrong. And so much more so that your DH tried to present this to you as a fait accompli and is sulking about it when you present the array of logical objections.
The odds that they would take advantage of their family status as your renters - and that your DH would let them - are very high. It's easy to imagine a scenario where they cry poor or want to take a cruise or even legitimately have a health emergency, then plead their case to your DH that they can't pay rent "for a month or two." And then you're stuck with the whole mortgage payment. That's the real risk I see with this deal - by holding the bag on the mortgage and "renting" to your husband's parents, you're totally exposed if they decide they need or want some charity from their son and he decides to give it.
Anonymous wrote:OP here:
Some more details: I like my in-laws. They own a house in another area outright. If they sold, they'd get about 200K. They have been looking in Va, near here but not Nova. They can't find anything they like in their price range and are debt avoidant; maybe because of their age.
To be clear, they have money and to my knowledge, are not in debt. My FIL is a lawyer and my husband has an MBA. I love the idea of consulting an estate planner but DH won't go for it b/c he thinks that those two have it covered.
DH tried to compare my interest-free loan of 2K to my brother to this situation. My brother needed a car to get to work. They just want something bigger, fancier, and more land and no debt.
He keeps countering every single reason I have for not wanting to do this deal. We have investments and he says this is for diversity. All I know is that we live well below our means and could pay off all of our debts with our investments if we had to (car/house are only debts and that amounts to maybe 400K total).
I can think of many reasons to not do this and many are emotional. I need more logical reasons. You've given me some good ones. I mentioned the real estate fund and he said why pay somebody else to do something we can do.
What really pisses me off is that we have a lot of here and now boring stuff to do and he won't do that. Rather, he prefers to live in a fantasy world while the laundry goes undone, house un-clean, birthday party unplanned.
My biggest issue is I would loose my freedom to just quit my job if ever I had to do that. PP mentions some of those other situations and I suppose I could play the thought game but the reality is I will never agree to this so why waste time discussing it?
Final thing: My family is super poor. He would never buy an investment property where they live and make this deal with them but they are the ones who would most benefit from any largess we might possess. Frankly, I wouldn't either because, again, I worked hard, saved a lot and don't want to loose my flexibility.