Anonymous wrote:So she does not have the right to know who is caring for her child? When ex is in Vegas and daughter is with girlfriend, not even the new wife, she does not have the right to know?
Anonymous wrote:We heard that her child is concerned about her and has been requested to lie by dad. That is pretty much all we need to know.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP I'm on your side. Of course you have a right to know who is caring for your child. I don't see how this is unreasonable.
Short answer: she is divorced.
What part of EX-wife don't you people understand?
So she does not have the right to know who is caring for her child? When ex is in Vegas and daughter is with girlfriend, not even the new wife, she does not have the right to know?
The meanness here is mind boggling. Come on, DCUM !
Real answer- probobly not depending on the jurisdiction and the language of the agreement. If she has right of first refusal or a non-cohabitation clause, then maybe. But those are notoriously hard to enforce.
I'm not the OP, but you guys are completely insane. Legally, those rights are hard to enforce, yes, but are you actually suggesting that the OP's ex is engaging in good parenting practices by:
a) moving a girlfriend into the house before an engagement or marriage
b) leaving a 7-year-old in the care of that live in girlfriend and going to Vegas for a couple days
c) asking the 7-year-old child to lie to her mother about living situation
On any other day, this guy would be pilloried for moving in a girlfriend at all, much less a+b+c. The idea that because the OP is divorced, she's no longer within her rights to request to know that someone else is living with her child 50% of the time and is now an authority figure for this child.
If the OP's ex had rented a room to an unknown male and then left the 7-year-old with that person to go out of town and then asked the child to lie about it, you guys would be freaking out that the unknown male could be a child molester. But now apparently the OP needs to just sit down and shut up because she got divorced and no longer has any business knowing who is involved in her kid's life.
UNBELIEVABLE.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP I'm on your side. Of course you have a right to know who is caring for your child. I don't see how this is unreasonable.
Short answer: she is divorced.
What part of EX-wife don't you people understand?
So she does not have the right to know who is caring for her child? When ex is in Vegas and daughter is with girlfriend, not even the new wife, she does not have the right to know?
The meanness here is mind boggling. Come on, DCUM !
Real answer- probobly not depending on the jurisdiction and the language of the agreement. If she has right of first refusal or a non-cohabitation clause, then maybe. But those are notoriously hard to enforce.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP I'm on your side. Of course you have a right to know who is caring for your child. I don't see how this is unreasonable.
Short answer: she is divorced.
What part of EX-wife don't you people understand?
So she does not have the right to know who is caring for her child? When ex is in Vegas and daughter is with girlfriend, not even the new wife, she does not have the right to know?
The meanness here is mind boggling. Come on, DCUM !
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP I'm on your side. Of course you have a right to know who is caring for your child. I don't see how this is unreasonable.
Short answer: she is divorced.
What part of EX-wife don't you people understand?
Anonymous wrote:OP I'm on your side. Of course you have a right to know who is caring for your child. I don't see how this is unreasonable.
Anonymous wrote:Actually, PP you're mistaken. Sure, he can have a relationship with anyone he wants. But as soon as that person is living under the same roof as the child, all bets are off. The other parent is well within his/her bounds to know who is sharing a home with their child, whether it's a roommate, a relative or a lover.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Actually, PP you're mistaken. Sure, he can have a relationship with anyone he wants. But as soon as that person is living under the same roof as the child, all bets are off. The other parent is well within his/her bounds to know who is sharing a home with their child, whether it's a roommate, a relative or a lover.
+1
Actually unless it is written in the custody document there is nothing OP can do. Even if it is in the document OP still would have to drag his butt to court to enforce the provision and have to demonstrate to a judge why it is bad to a child.
However, her ex (like mine) is a control freak ass. Try to let it go OP and model good behavior to your daughter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Actually, PP you're mistaken. Sure, he can have a relationship with anyone he wants. But as soon as that person is living under the same roof as the child, all bets are off. The other parent is well within his/her bounds to know who is sharing a home with their child, whether it's a roommate, a relative or a lover.
+1
Anonymous wrote:Actually, PP you're mistaken. Sure, he can have a relationship with anyone he wants. But as soon as that person is living under the same roof as the child, all bets are off. The other parent is well within his/her bounds to know who is sharing a home with their child, whether it's a roommate, a relative or a lover.