Anonymous wrote:Maybe they could give the campus to Virginia Tech? Use it for something.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can't charge a lot of money and not have a lot to offer. I think we will be seeing this more and more. The single sex part was the nail in the coffin.
There are a number of quite good single-sex colleges remaining. But what will be the deathknell for them is the way they are twisting them selves in pretzel knots to remain women's colleges in theory while allowing trannies and "women in transition." Recently Mount Holyoke I think cancelled a performance of the play "the Vagina Monologues," not because it is insufferable, but rather because some might deem it insensitive to students who self identify as female but who have penises.If these schools are already accepting those who might accurately be called "girly men," then they might as well go ahead and accept men generally.
"Girly men"?
Tell me, are you able to buy shirts, what with your knuckles dragging the floor like that?
Oh, knock it off. This PP makes some excellent points.
Really? Buried in all that snottiness is a point?
Yes, I think so. In a desperate attempt to attract more $tudent$ some of these colleges are being idiotically politically correct, thus turning off more people than they are actually attracting.
It's a small minority of bigoted alums who are upset about the schools being trans-inclusionary. The schools are better off without them.
Either they are women's colleges or not. If they are going down the road of pretending to maintain their supposed single sex status while indulging a politically correct gender freak show, why not just go coed?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've never even heard of it, and I'm one of those people who brought a horse to college (albeit to the University of CT). Clearly their marketing wasn't stellar.
Their former riding coach was the coach for the US Olympic Team. Dedicated riders knew Sweet Briar.
+1
I can't believe there would be any equestrians, especially on the east coast, who wouldn't have heard of Sweet Briar.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I had always heard that it wasn't a "real" school, and am surprised to hear it was even accredited.
Actually, it was a finishing school. It was only accredited for 117 years.
I posted that. 117 years as a degree-granting institution isn't bad. I actually just thought it was a place to send silly girls after high school. I didn't even know they granted degrees other institutions would recognize.
I didn't grow up in this region and only heard about the school as an undergrad elsewhere myself, when my classmates from the mid-Atlantic made fun of this anachronistic place for not-so-smart girls who nevertheless have to maintain some kind of social standing in their little southern towns.
It seems, from the comments here, there was some of that, but it has been an actual college.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've never even heard of it, and I'm one of those people who brought a horse to college (albeit to the University of CT). Clearly their marketing wasn't stellar.
Their former riding coach was the coach for the US Olympic Team. Dedicated riders knew Sweet Briar.
+1
I can't believe there would be any equestrians, especially on the east coast, who wouldn't have heard of Sweet Briar.
Anonymous wrote:Maybe they could give the campus to Virginia Tech? Use it for something.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can't charge a lot of money and not have a lot to offer. I think we will be seeing this more and more. The single sex part was the nail in the coffin.
There are a number of quite good single-sex colleges remaining. But what will be the deathknell for them is the way they are twisting them selves in pretzel knots to remain women's colleges in theory while allowing trannies and "women in transition." Recently Mount Holyoke I think cancelled a performance of the play "the Vagina Monologues," not because it is insufferable, but rather because some might deem it insensitive to students who self identify as female but who have penises.If these schools are already accepting those who might accurately be called "girly men," then they might as well go ahead and accept men generally.
"Girly men"?
Tell me, are you able to buy shirts, what with your knuckles dragging the floor like that?
Oh, knock it off. This PP makes some excellent points.
Really? Buried in all that snottiness is a point?
Yes, I think so. In a desperate attempt to attract more $tudent$ some of these colleges are being idiotically politically correct, thus turning off more people than they are actually attracting.
It's a small minority of bigoted alums who are upset about the schools being trans-inclusionary. The schools are better off without them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I had always heard that it wasn't a "real" school, and am surprised to hear it was even accredited.
Actually, it was a finishing school. It was only accredited for 117 years.
Anonymous wrote:I had always heard that it wasn't a "real" school, and am surprised to hear it was even accredited.
Anonymous wrote:This is the tip of the iceberg. In 20 years time, many schools will be shutting down.