Anonymous wrote:I am shocked that anyone could argue that Anglicanism and Roman Catholicism are the same and interchangeable.
Anglicans believe priests can marry, females can be priests, there is no papal infallibility, the wafer does not magically and literally transform into the body of Christ during the communion, faith alone is the key to heaven, the bible rather than the Church is the ultimate authority, and so on.
To outsiders things like transubstantiation may seem abstruse and recondite, but to believers they could be the difference between an eternity in the kingdom of Heaven and a one-way ticket to Beelzebub and his dark minions.
Anonymous wrote:OP..I NEVER understand people like you. I'm a pretty flexible person, but there are about 4 things in life that are absolutely non negotiable and religion is one of them. How is this evenue an issue? My DH would feel foolish after asking this twice. I'd be direct and to the point. The second time I'd be so crystal clear there would not be a third, and if he tried a third time I'd be worried he might be suffering alzhhimers.
You must be pussy footing around the issue. Grow a pait and your problem will go away.
Anonymous wrote:
It's one thing to discount a particular aspect of a religion when you've been born into it. But it's a much more difficult thing to do if you are thinking of adopting that religion as your own. That's one reason many converts to Islam are very fundamentalist/conservative. My Muslim born husband is fine with saying "bismillah" over his food and considering it halal. Many converts to islam will eat nothing but meat bought at a halal butcher shop. It's just harder to pick and choose when you start outside a particular religion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Those of you saying it's all the same need to read up on transubstantiation. That and the authority of Rome are my issues, and non-negotiable. DH knew this.
Most RCs don't have a clue about transubstantiation? Some who might, don't really even think about it.
As far as the authority of Rome ....... give me a break! Every Pope has said that practising any artificial form of birth control is a sin yet the vast majority of RCs in the US and much of the Western world ignore that dicturm.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Those of you saying it's all the same need to read up on transubstantiation. That and the authority of Rome are my issues, and non-negotiable. DH knew this.
Most RCs don't have a clue about transubstantiation? Some who might, don't really even think about it.
As far as the authority of Rome ....... give me a break! Every Pope has said that practising any artificial form of birth control is a sin yet the vast majority of RCs in the US and much of the Western world ignore that dicturm.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Those of you saying it's all the same need to read up on transubstantiation. That and the authority of Rome are my issues, and non-negotiable. DH knew this.