Anonymous wrote:
They don't devote weeks to test prep, announcements about test prep, and testing. Frees up tons of time. More homogeneous groupings (ability, effort, behavior) = get more done, faster. My DC had to repeat a year of MCPS "IM / pre algebra) in private instead of taking algebra in 8th grade, but says they move through the work much more quickly. AND when the kids spell words wrong in the word problems, the teacher addressed the issue. In fact, the math teacher not only taught them how to spell Wednesday but taught them the meanings / Latin derivations for each day of the week! Thank you, Mrs. Sparling!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cons - Cost
Pros - everything else
You beat me to it!
We looked very closely at our MoCo public since cost is definitely a consideration for us. Hands down, the privates we considered beat the public in every single aspect- better curriculum, better facilities, more recess, more PE, more art, music and drama, better differentiation and ability to teach to the individual child, better teachers (from what I've heard, there are some awesome and some not-so-great teachers at our public- the teachers at our private are across-the-board incredible), greater emphasis on character development, greater emphasis on reading/writing/public speaking, better lunch offerings, not only smaller classes, but smaller overall school so that kids are all known by the Headmasters, most of the teachers and most other families of the school. Having attended both a "top" public and a private school myself eons, ago, I admit I'm biased. While in many situations, one can obtain a comparable education, the overall experience at a private is generally far superior than the overall experience at a public.
I find it hard to believe that there are no average/just OK teachers in private schools and only public schools can have a mix of awesome & not-so-great teachers. Certainly private schools can offer a lot of advantages but it is certainly possible to run into a not-incredible teacher in ANY school. In fact, my friend whose kids are at a private school was just complaining to me this a.m. about the awful science teacher she's dealing with this year (DD in 6th grade).
I've always wondered how privates can have more of everything, yet still do the basics with math and writing--and ostensibly better than the publics. Where is the time for all this? Especially when you add in current events like Nelson Mandela dying. Private school isn't a longer day.
BTW, I get it when people say they want smaller classes, you have gobs of money, or a kid who needs special attention.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cons - Cost
Pros - everything else
You beat me to it!
We looked very closely at our MoCo public since cost is definitely a consideration for us. Hands down, the privates we considered beat the public in every single aspect- better curriculum, better facilities, more recess, more PE, more art, music and drama, better differentiation and ability to teach to the individual child, better teachers (from what I've heard, there are some awesome and some not-so-great teachers at our public- the teachers at our private are across-the-board incredible), greater emphasis on character development, greater emphasis on reading/writing/public speaking, better lunch offerings, not only smaller classes, but smaller overall school so that kids are all known by the Headmasters, most of the teachers and most other families of the school. Having attended both a "top" public and a private school myself eons, ago, I admit I'm biased. While in many situations, one can obtain a comparable education, the overall experience at a private is generally far superior than the overall experience at a public.
I find it hard to believe that there are no average/just OK teachers in private schools and only public schools can have a mix of awesome & not-so-great teachers. Certainly private schools can offer a lot of advantages but it is certainly possible to run into a not-incredible teacher in ANY school. In fact, my friend whose kids are at a private school was just complaining to me this a.m. about the awful science teacher she's dealing with this year (DD in 6th grade).
Anonymous wrote:At our private, breakfast, snack and lunch are included and are very tasty. Nothing like public school slop.
Not having to make breakfast or pack lunch everyday is priceless. Very appreciative of that.
Anonymous wrote:
At MCPS, PE and all other specials are once a week and ranges from 25-40min depending on how overcrowded they are. And they NEVER EVER EVER take them outside for PE. That was a huge pet peeve of mine when my child went to public. At private, some teachers take the kids outside for their classes if they day is nice. My DD had a math teacher that took them out for Four Square Math problems. She loved that. PE is almost 100% outside at our private. And lower school gets 2 recesses a day for 20-25min each. They also have a garden they work on in science. For my child moving around, fresh air, learning all work together. Sitting in a chair with 30 other kids ALL day long in public, did not. If it rained in public, they watched a show. Mindless. No movement, no creativity. Sucked.
Anonymous wrote:At our private, breakfast, snack and lunch are included and are very tasty. Nothing like public school slop.
Not having to make breakfast or pack lunch everyday is priceless. Very appreciative of that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:private pros:
recess every day (vs. once a week)
music and art part of the curriculum
aren't these things true at public schools??
They are true in MCPS.
Not true in MCPS. Rosemary Hills zoned family here. PE once a week K-2. And we were told this was county-wide.
Anonymous wrote:Can you name the school?