Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our child with over a 4.0 and similar SAT's was rejected from MacAlester, Emory, and Oberlin. Your child will not get into those schools.
And my 3.3. kid ('tho w/higher SATS -- above 2300) is at an Ivy. There are so many factors involved that you can't lay bets. At this point, OP and her DS are looking at schools and starting to put together a list, so it makes sense to cast the net broadly.
Your DC had no hooks?
No hooks.
I find that hard to believe since I know kids with perfect SATs and higher GPAs who didn't get into an Ivy. There had to be something about your child that made him/her stand out. A sport or special talent, maybe?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our child with over a 4.0 and similar SAT's was rejected from MacAlester, Emory, and Oberlin. Your child will not get into those schools.
And my 3.3. kid ('tho w/higher SATS -- above 2300) is at an Ivy. There are so many factors involved that you can't lay bets. At this point, OP and her DS are looking at schools and starting to put together a list, so it makes sense to cast the net broadly.
Your DC had no hooks?
No hooks.
I find that hard to believe since I know kids with perfect SATs and higher GPAs who didn't get into an Ivy. There had to be something about your child that made him/her stand out. A sport or special talent, maybe?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our child with over a 4.0 and similar SAT's was rejected from MacAlester, Emory, and Oberlin. Your child will not get into those schools.
And my 3.3. kid ('tho w/higher SATS -- above 2300) is at an Ivy. There are so many factors involved that you can't lay bets. At this point, OP and her DS are looking at schools and starting to put together a list, so it makes sense to cast the net broadly.
Your DC had no hooks?
No hooks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our child with over a 4.0 and similar SAT's was rejected from MacAlester, Emory, and Oberlin. Your child will not get into those schools.
And my 3.3. kid ('tho w/higher SATS -- above 2300) is at an Ivy. There are so many factors involved that you can't lay bets. At this point, OP and her DS are looking at schools and starting to put together a list, so it makes sense to cast the net broadly.
Your DC had no hooks?
Anonymous wrote:Quirky-ish boy (kind of a conventional quirky type) from an area private. 3.3 GPA, but he doesn't have a single C or D on his transcript thus far (junior). He took the SAT this fall and got 2100 without prep, so we are thinking he might be able to raise it a bit. Good ECs - varsity sport, forensics, service club, and does volunteering with underprivileged kids on a regular basis. Looking to major in economics or maybe finance.
The only criteria he has said is important to him is that it's in a mid-size city or above (say, Richmond size). Nothing rural.
Any thoughts?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about University of Richmond?
That GPA may be a stretch for Univ of Richmond
Anonymous wrote:What about University of Richmond?
Anonymous wrote:What about University of Richmond?
Anonymous wrote:William & Mary, Macalester, Tulane, Occidental
Also look at the larger public universities - Wisconsin, Illinois, Colorado, Washington, UC Santa Barbara, UC Santa Cruz, UC Irvine
Sounds like you're a private school basher with your comment "publics you pay for." You should calm down or maybe follow the advice you gave to PP.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are giving too much credit to private school aspect. A B student will be viewed as a B student no matter what. 2100 SAT kids are dime a dozen in MCPS.
3.3 is B+, not B.
And yes, admissions officers know it is harder to get a B+ average at sidwell than an average public high school.
OP didn't indicate her son is at Sidwell. He could easily be at one of those privates that people call "publics you pay for." We just don't know. So please take your bizarre public-bashing agenda elsewhere. TIA!