Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I applied for two attorney jobs with the same agency through USAJobs. Got an interview within two weeks for one and a job offer. Interview request two weeks later for the other, but had already accepted the job offer at that point. I am a woman, but no other special status.
Are you also white?
Anonymous wrote:I applied for two attorney jobs with the same agency through USAJobs. Got an interview within two weeks for one and a job offer. Interview request two weeks later for the other, but had already accepted the job offer at that point. I am a woman, but no other special status.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:my friend was working at an agency for years and her boss created a new job specifically for her (she has very specialized skills) BUT then the boss had to give the job to a less-qualified vet. my friend just left after that - so heart breaking for her.
This is annoying to me. Up front, no, I'm not a vet. Yes, I believe accommodations should be made for veterans who have served our country. But I hate the "vet preference" that gives additional weight to their qualification scores. Those scores should be based on merit alone. If, after the scores are calculated, there is a vet on the list, I have no problem giving them the first interview/preference for the job, but they should make that list on their own merits first. Just my opinion, I'm sure someone will have a problem with it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Huh, this is interesting. I'm not a fed, but I did apply for one job for which I was very well qualified. I never heard from anyone, which surprised me a little, and they ended up hiring someone who I think was less qualified. I would have been much less surprised if they'd just hired someone internally, which is what I had thought they'd do. I found the questions really repetitive and not particularly relevant to the job, plus I had a lot of trouble with formatting the electronic resume and I suspect it ended up looking pretty crappy. I have a great private sector job, so I didn't care that much, but it's sort of the government's loss if this is driving away good candidates.
+1
+2
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Huh, this is interesting. I'm not a fed, but I did apply for one job for which I was very well qualified. I never heard from anyone, which surprised me a little, and they ended up hiring someone who I think was less qualified. I would have been much less surprised if they'd just hired someone internally, which is what I had thought they'd do. I found the questions really repetitive and not particularly relevant to the job, plus I had a lot of trouble with formatting the electronic resume and I suspect it ended up looking pretty crappy. I have a great private sector job, so I didn't care that much, but it's sort of the government's loss if this is driving away good candidates.
+1
Anonymous wrote:Huh, this is interesting. I'm not a fed, but I did apply for one job for which I was very well qualified. I never heard from anyone, which surprised me a little, and they ended up hiring someone who I think was less qualified. I would have been much less surprised if they'd just hired someone internally, which is what I had thought they'd do. I found the questions really repetitive and not particularly relevant to the job, plus I had a lot of trouble with formatting the electronic resume and I suspect it ended up looking pretty crappy. I have a great private sector job, so I didn't care that much, but it's sort of the government's loss if this is driving away good candidates.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not a vet, and just got a job through USAJOBS. I am a lawyer, and got a DOJ job. I applied to ~25 jobs, and only got 2 interviews, and one job.
DOJ has direct hire authority for lawyers. It's not the same as other positions.
Gotcha.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not a vet, and just got a job through USAJOBS. I am a lawyer, and got a DOJ job. I applied to ~25 jobs, and only got 2 interviews, and one job.
DOJ has direct hire authority for lawyers. It's not the same as other positions.