Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:16:31 here: I looked at this again and the documents suggest that the movement of kids who might be moved from Kilmer AAP to a new Thoreau AAP center would be "AAP students residing within the Thoreau MS attendance area" currently at Kilmer AAP (main summary document at p. 15).
I don't know how that could possibly involve 250 students (see Attachment C - Map 10 at p. 11). Most Thoreau kids go the the Jackson AAP center, not Kilmer. The only exception seems to be the Kilmer AAP kids at Freedom Hill and Stenwood who have Thoreau as their base school, and I don't think anywhere close to 250 kids fall in that category, since Kilmer is the base school for most Freedom Hill and Stenwood kids. That's what made me think this option must involve moving other Kilmer AAP kids to Thoreau. Guess the actual details would emerge later if that option got some real traction.
It was nicer for Vienna when Kilmer was the base AAP center for all of Vienna. Then there was a nice percentage of kids from that school going on to Madison and Marshall. For many years there's been odd boundaries for middle and high school where some Cunningham Park and Stenwood kids going to Thoreau and then to Marshall and some Wolftrap and Westbriar kids going to Kilmer and then Madison.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The materials for the Work Session have now been posted.
http://www.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/goto?open&id=9PANAF5EF993
The materials are far more detailed and transparent about the range of options and their potential timing than anything included in CIP materials for many years.
There are lots of options identified that would potentially affect different schools over the next decade, but the biggest theme seems to be that we cannot maintain the AAP centers in their current form, as they skew enrollments at too many schools, leading to schools that are both seriously overcrowded and significantly underenrolled. There are many suggestions to move kids out of overcrowded centers like Kilmer and Longfellow.
I was also pleased to see Facilities admit that some of its short-term projections were seriously off, although they don't seem to identify when the latest projections were developed. Had they used the projections made public in the spring of 2014, some of the differences between the projected vs. actual fall 2014 enrollments would have been even larger.
Thank you for posting this link.
Have you seen any data on # of students receiving Level IV AAP services to be moved from one school to another? I cannot locate it in the attachments.
I'm not entirely sure what you mean, but if you look at the maps at Attachment C you get some feel for the potential impact. So, for example, Map 10 at p. 11 of Attachment C reflects a projected future movement of 250 AAP students from Kilmer to Thoreau and 150 AAP students from Jackson to Thoreau. And Map 7 at p. 8 of Attachment C reflects a proposed future movement of AAP students out of Kilmer and Longfellow to Cooper, although some of the other Kilmer numbers on that slide are wrong.
And then if you look at the summary in the main document, you see that Facilities has suggested that Thoreau might get an AAP center in the 2017-18 time frame (p. 15), whereas Cooper might get an AAP center in the 2019-21 time frame (p. 14). Those dates are based on when the renovations at Thoreau and Cooper are expected to be completed.
You may have entirely different schools in mind, but that gives you some idea as to how the information ties together. All of these "solutions" are described as "options" for the different Board Members to consider for their districts.
Thank you for taking the time to go into those details.
I am looking Belvedere ES. From what I am reading, Map 17 (referred to at the bottom of page 17 in the summary document, Attachment A) would send AAP students from Belvedere to either Annandale Terrace or Braddock. Belvedere is in a different high school pyramid (Stuart).
From the feeder school enrollment numbers from 2012-2013:
http://fcag.org/documents/aap_center_data/aap_enrollment_1213.pdf
Belvedere had 62 students across grades 3 - 5 attending the AAP center. So for this option, they will take the larger number of students and put them on a bus to attend a school outside their pyramid to join 27 students (Annandale Terrace, Braddock and North Springfield combined) for a total of 89 students over grades 3 - 5.
I have to say these numbers just seem very wrong. I also cannot see the logic of busing more kids, and out of their high school pyramid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The materials for the Work Session have now been posted.
http://www.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/goto?open&id=9PANAF5EF993
The materials are far more detailed and transparent about the range of options and their potential timing than anything included in CIP materials for many years.
There are lots of options identified that would potentially affect different schools over the next decade, but the biggest theme seems to be that we cannot maintain the AAP centers in their current form, as they skew enrollments at too many schools, leading to schools that are both seriously overcrowded and significantly underenrolled. There are many suggestions to move kids out of overcrowded centers like Kilmer and Longfellow.
I was also pleased to see Facilities admit that some of its short-term projections were seriously off, although they don't seem to identify when the latest projections were developed. Had they used the projections made public in the spring of 2014, some of the differences between the projected vs. actual fall 2014 enrollments would have been even larger.
Thank you for posting this link.
Have you seen any data on # of students receiving Level IV AAP services to be moved from one school to another? I cannot locate it in the attachments.
I'm not entirely sure what you mean, but if you look at the maps at Attachment C you get some feel for the potential impact. So, for example, Map 10 at p. 11 of Attachment C reflects a projected future movement of 250 AAP students from Kilmer to Thoreau and 150 AAP students from Jackson to Thoreau. And Map 7 at p. 8 of Attachment C reflects a proposed future movement of AAP students out of Kilmer and Longfellow to Cooper, although some of the other Kilmer numbers on that slide are wrong.
And then if you look at the summary in the main document, you see that Facilities has suggested that Thoreau might get an AAP center in the 2017-18 time frame (p. 15), whereas Cooper might get an AAP center in the 2019-21 time frame (p. 14). Those dates are based on when the renovations at Thoreau and Cooper are expected to be completed.
You may have entirely different schools in mind, but that gives you some idea as to how the information ties together. All of these "solutions" are described as "options" for the different Board Members to consider for their districts.
Anonymous wrote:16:31 here: I looked at this again and the documents suggest that the movement of kids who might be moved from Kilmer AAP to a new Thoreau AAP center would be "AAP students residing within the Thoreau MS attendance area" currently at Kilmer AAP (main summary document at p. 15).
I don't know how that could possibly involve 250 students (see Attachment C - Map 10 at p. 11). Most Thoreau kids go the the Jackson AAP center, not Kilmer. The only exception seems to be the Kilmer AAP kids at Freedom Hill and Stenwood who have Thoreau as their base school, and I don't think anywhere close to 250 kids fall in that category, since Kilmer is the base school for most Freedom Hill and Stenwood kids. That's what made me think this option must involve moving other Kilmer AAP kids to Thoreau. Guess the actual details would emerge later if that option got some real traction.
Anonymous wrote:There are about 460 AAP students at Kilmer. So after all that, 50 AAP students would be left at Kilmer? Or eventually Kilmer would have an AAP center?
Anonymous wrote:There are about 460 AAP students at Kilmer. So after all that, 50 AAP students would be left at Kilmer? Or eventually Kilmer would have an AAP center?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The materials for the Work Session have now been posted.
http://www.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/goto?open&id=9PANAF5EF993
The materials are far more detailed and transparent about the range of options and their potential timing than anything included in CIP materials for many years.
There are lots of options identified that would potentially affect different schools over the next decade, but the biggest theme seems to be that we cannot maintain the AAP centers in their current form, as they skew enrollments at too many schools, leading to schools that are both seriously overcrowded and significantly underenrolled. There are many suggestions to move kids out of overcrowded centers like Kilmer and Longfellow.
I was also pleased to see Facilities admit that some of its short-term projections were seriously off, although they don't seem to identify when the latest projections were developed. Had they used the projections made public in the spring of 2014, some of the differences between the projected vs. actual fall 2014 enrollments would have been even larger.
Thank you for posting this link.
Have you seen any data on # of students receiving Level IV AAP services to be moved from one school to another? I cannot locate it in the attachments.
Anonymous wrote:The materials for the Work Session have now been posted.
http://www.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/goto?open&id=9PANAF5EF993
The materials are far more detailed and transparent about the range of options and their potential timing than anything included in CIP materials for many years.
There are lots of options identified that would potentially affect different schools over the next decade, but the biggest theme seems to be that we cannot maintain the AAP centers in their current form, as they skew enrollments at too many schools, leading to schools that are both seriously overcrowded and significantly underenrolled. There are many suggestions to move kids out of overcrowded centers like Kilmer and Longfellow.
I was also pleased to see Facilities admit that some of its short-term projections were seriously off, although they don't seem to identify when the latest projections were developed. Had they used the projections made public in the spring of 2014, some of the differences between the projected vs. actual fall 2014 enrollments would have been even larger.
Anonymous wrote:They have to make some changes by next year when the giant wave of current AAP 5th graders hits middle school.
As far as guessing their long term goals, are they prioritizing keeping people in the same region from ES through HS? Are they trying to avoid split feeders? I hope that they make changes that make sense, rather than just catering to temporary capacity issues.