My experience has been that the students who tend to leave Oyster early are struggling/have always struggled with Spanish. The "not enough advanced math" is usually a cover for their so-so to failing performance in the language. It's a face-saving excuse
The students who have, in the past, left for Deal have been top students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP - anyone who chooses to send their kid to a school but who doesn't subscribe to the stated mission, purpose and objectives of the school (i.e. dual language) rightly deserves any criticisms and judgements that come their way.
What if, after many years of investment, the family realizes the school is not doing anything besides dual language well? That there are significant gaps in students' experiences, and that, if it's going to be any kind of a "good" school, these need to be addressed seriously and effectively. This choice between Spanish and advanced math (or any other aspect of academic rigor) is a false one.
My experience has been that the students who tend to leave Oyster early are struggling/have always struggled with Spanish. The "not enough advanced math" is usually a cover for their so-so to failing performance in the language. It's a face-saving excuse.
The students who have, in the past, left for Deal have been top students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP - anyone who chooses to send their kid to a school but who doesn't subscribe to the stated mission, purpose and objectives of the school (i.e. dual language) rightly deserves any criticisms and judgements that come their way.
What if, after many years of investment, the family realizes the school is not doing anything besides dual language well? That there are significant gaps in students' experiences, and that, if it's going to be any kind of a "good" school, these need to be addressed seriously and effectively. This choice between Spanish and advanced math (or any other aspect of academic rigor) is a false one.
My experience has been that the students who tend to leave Oyster early are struggling/have always struggled with Spanish. The "not enough advanced math" is usually a cover for their so-so to failing performance in the language. It's a face-saving excuse.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP - anyone who chooses to send their kid to a school but who doesn't subscribe to the stated mission, purpose and objectives of the school (i.e. dual language) rightly deserves any criticisms and judgements that come their way.
What if, after many years of investment, the family realizes the school is not doing anything besides dual language well? That there are significant gaps in students' experiences, and that, if it's going to be any kind of a "good" school, these need to be addressed seriously and effectively. This choice between Spanish and advanced math (or any other aspect of academic rigor) is a false one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP - anyone who chooses to send their kid to a school but who doesn't subscribe to the stated mission, purpose and objectives of the school (i.e. dual language) rightly deserves any criticisms and judgements that come their way.
What if, after many years of investment, the family realizes the school is not doing anything besides dual language well? That there are significant gaps in students' experiences, and that, if it's going to be any kind of a "good" school, these need to be addressed seriously and effectively. This choice between Spanish and advanced math (or any other aspect of academic rigor) is a false one.
Anonymous wrote:NP - anyone who chooses to send their kid to a school but who doesn't subscribe to the stated mission, purpose and objectives of the school (i.e. dual language) rightly deserves any criticisms and judgements that come their way.
It sounds as if you have the problem....However, I do call those parents' common sense and good judgement into question.
Anonymous wrote:I honestly don't understand the aggressive response from Oyster fanatics to all the parents who question whether bilingual education is right for their child or offering an English-only alternative. If anything, it seems to me that it makes little sense for Oyster to be a neighborhood school; why force IB families to take a space in a program there are literally hundreds of people waiting to get into? If someone says "take my space and give it to a bilingual household," is that something to condemn?
I do worry that I won't be able to participate fully in my daughter's education or be a resource to her. That's important to me. The response seems to be "suck it up and move, racist." (For the record, I've lived outside the US and speak another language; it just doesn't happen to be Spanish. I also have no dog in the fights over changes in administration, quality of middle school math, etc. - we're just starting out.) The pro-OA posters here are doing a great job of creating the impression that Oyster-Adams is a fundamentally unwelcoming environment for families that don't speak Spanish at home and don't have that as their highest priority; that does not make me any more excited about the school.
I would be interested in hearing from parents who shared those concerns and resolved them or from those who found public school alternatives (private school is an option, but I would really like to use a neighborhood public school - Eaton would be the most logical alternative given where our new house is). I would be less interested in hearing from those who seem to think that wanting something different for my child than you want for your child is a moral failing.
Anonymous wrote:I honestly don't understand the aggressive response from Oyster fanatics to all the parents who question whether bilingual education is right for their child or offering an English-only alternative. If anything, it seems to me that it makes little sense for Oyster to be a neighborhood school; why force IB families to take a space in a program there are literally hundreds of people waiting to get into? If someone says "take my space and give it to a bilingual household," is that something to condemn?
I do worry that I won't be able to participate fully in my daughter's education or be a resource to her. That's important to me. The response seems to be "suck it up and move, racist." (For the record, I've lived outside the US and speak another language; it just doesn't happen to be Spanish. I also have no dog in the fights over changes in administration, quality of middle school math, etc. - we're just starting out.) The pro-OA posters here are doing a great job of creating the impression that Oyster-Adams is a fundamentally unwelcoming environment for families that don't speak Spanish at home and don't have that as their highest priority; that does not make me any more excited about the school.
I would be interested in hearing from parents who shared those concerns and resolved them or from those who found public school alternatives (private school is an option, but I would really like to use a neighborhood public school - Eaton would be the most logical alternative given where our new house is). I would be less interested in hearing from those who seem to think that wanting something different for my child than you want for your child is a moral failing.