Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If there is a payback requirement, one day of work won't satisfy it. Tell them now and expect some bridges to be burnt.
They can't make you "pay back" maternity leave. As for burning bridges, explain your reasoning and be professional and friendly and you won't burn any. But in different circumstances, a law firm wouldn't think twice about burning you if were in their interest. Plenty of lawyers have been laid off (RIFed) after returning from a maternity leave. (Only really dumb firms lay off staff while they are on leave, but it's been known to happen.)
Anonymous wrote:PP, exactly. I find it nuts considering I know plenty of people who are RIF'ed after maternity leave. (Putting aside people who are just sacked as a matter of course).
I find the whole question of ethics to be a side show. You are at-will. And you are not working for anyone else. If I had publicly announced my federal clerkship back in 09, you better believe I would have spent ten months unemployed. Watch out for yourself, give notice and move on. Your supporters will be supportive because you are a potential lead at the very least.
The whole tell them now stuff is nonsense.
Anonymous wrote:If there is a payback requirement, one day of work won't satisfy it. Tell them now and expect some bridges to be burnt.
Anonymous wrote:That's not true. Under the DC and VA bar rules, there is no ethical requirement regarding giving notice. There's a requirement about ensuring client transitions are taken care of and whether a client is left hanging in the breeze without counsel but in terms of ethical obligations...unless there's a direct conflict (and going in house rarely poses one), you are fine. Particularly since you are on leave.
I am the woman who left to go in house during leave. I looked into this extensively. Finish up your leave.e Go back and give notice during which time make sure your clients are transitioned, etc. You can't just quit and never come back but there is no need to tell them sooner.
Anonymous wrote:Well, OP. You can have it either way. Cower in fear over what people think or just build a network and move on.
And to the poster above, the reference point makes sense to me. If you can pull references together to get a new job, then you'll be fine and really don't need to bother about "burning bridges." Who knows how long that PP was at that firm or whether he had worked elsewhere and build a decent network there.
That said, don't pull punches. Put in your two weeks and move on, respectfully but firmly. That's what I would do (and I'm still in biglaw as a partner).
Anonymous wrote:Maternity leave is a benefit you earned. Ignore the harpies. They wouldn't dare come after a man who was off due to a stroke who decided they didn't want to come back. There is no legal difference between the two situations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Arg. Why do so many women do this? We fight and fight for reasonable maternity benefits, and then women like OP decide to take advantage and screw us all by cashing in when they have no intention of going back to work.
Don't be that person, OP. Give notice. Pay back whatever you obviously owe because you went on leave under false pretenses. Think about someone besides yourself.
OP here. Didn't go on maternity leave on false pretenses. I didn't expect to actually get a job offer - especially in this economy/industry. I fully figured I would be going back to work at the firm. The job offer presented itself mid-maternity leave and I couldn't pass it up and now I am seeking advice from you guys on how to handle it.
Ethically, I think you need to give notice as soon as you have accepted an offer with another employer. So, tell your firm now.
Anonymous wrote:Previous PP. My reputation is fine. I've got great connections (and wouldn't have been able to get through the reference checks, etc.). I have a pretty great network and honestly could land someone somewhere else if needed.
The biglaw world is transient and quite honestly isn't that small. This isn't the US Attorney's office or DOJ. People's memories run short. And truthfully, if they weren't on board to support you -- giving or not giving notice isn't going to make a difference. That person isn't going to help you and you are best served moving on.
One thing I think needs to be driven home is that if someone is going to "black list" you for taking an accrued benefit and quitting (when honestly you are going to be screwed anyway -- we all know about those extra years added to partnership consideration "per maternity leave."). It's not a contest. There's no bridge to burn because there's no bridge in the first place.