. Nice try, sweetie but I am neither a mil nor mad. However, the repeated defense of ignorance in the face of evidence to the contrary is both childish and asinine.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:. It was used correctly. The misunderstanding was caused by someone's poor verbal skills--the very same someone who was criticizing the post and the poster. That "difference" doesn't make the ignorance acceptable.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:. Good grief. You do have comprehension issues. This is not at all what was said or even implied.Anonymous wrote:PP is saying you should stand by and take it. I don't agree.
![]()
Well then how it was used was misunderstood, not the actual word. That's different.
MIL is MAAAAADDDD!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Anonymous wrote:. It was used correctly. The misunderstanding was caused by someone's poor verbal skills--the very same someone who was criticizing the post and the poster. That "difference" doesn't make the ignorance acceptable.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:. Good grief. You do have comprehension issues. This is not at all what was said or even implied.Anonymous wrote:PP is saying you should stand by and take it. I don't agree.
![]()
Well then how it was used was misunderstood, not the actual word. That's different.
. It was used correctly. The misunderstanding was caused by someone's poor verbal skills--the very same someone who was criticizing the post and the poster. That "difference" doesn't make the ignorance acceptable.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:. Good grief. You do have comprehension issues. This is not at all what was said or even implied.Anonymous wrote:PP is saying you should stand by and take it. I don't agree.
![]()
Well then how it was used was misunderstood, not the actual word. That's different.
Anonymous wrote:. Good grief. You do have comprehension issues. This is not at all what was said or even implied.Anonymous wrote:PP is saying you should stand by and take it. I don't agree.
![]()
. You obviously only understand one definition of abide--see above. You are embarrassing yourself and are too insufferable to see it.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
No kidding. Still asking: why does one side have to "abide" by the other?
I think you chose the wrong word? Why so defensive?
You criticized her, you are completely wrong, she corrected you, and you keep digging yourself deeper. Even with the help of a dictionary you can't figure it out? Do yourself a favor and sign off now. You're looking dumber and sillier with every post.
Point is, we all know what abide means. You are the one not making sense. You are awfully defensive over nothing.
. Good grief. You do have comprehension issues. This is not at all what was said or even implied.Anonymous wrote:PP is saying you should stand by and take it. I don't agree.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
No kidding. Still asking: why does one side have to "abide" by the other?
I think you chose the wrong word? Why so defensive?
You criticized her, you are completely wrong, she corrected you, and you keep digging yourself deeper. Even with the help of a dictionary you can't figure it out? Do yourself a favor and sign off now. You're looking dumber and sillier with every post.
Anonymous wrote:
No kidding. Still asking: why does one side have to "abide" by the other?
I think you chose the wrong word? Why so defensive?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:. Doubtful. Mostly likely one or more intolerant people who can't. abide by some who approaches life differently.Anonymous wrote:
Someone mentioned on another IL thread that if the MIL and DIL are opposite each other with regard to personality; the MIL may take that as the (son) rejecting the MIL.
Brilliant and so true!
Your response is unclear. One side has to "abide" by the other????? Wow, there is your issue right there!
Anonymous wrote:
No kidding. Still asking: why does one side have to "abide" by the other?
I think you chose the wrong word? Why so defensive?
.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:. Doubtful. Mostly likely one or more intolerant people who can't. abide by some who approaches life differently.Anonymous wrote:
Someone mentioned on another IL thread that if the MIL and DIL are opposite each other with regard to personality; the MIL may take that as the (son) rejecting the MIL.
Brilliant and so true!
Your response is unclear. One side has to "abide" by the other????? Wow, there is your issue right there!