Anonymous wrote:

I don't recall anything in the Bible about God making Adam and Eve from an embryo. Embryos are not mentioned in the bible at all, I'm almost positive. They are one of those scientific findings that people didn't know about when the bible was first written, so god did not want to confuse people with ideas they could not understand.

Wait - this is a serious post?

I don't recall anything in the Bible about God making Adam and Eve from an embryo. Embryos are not mentioned in the bible at all, I'm almost positive. They are one of those scientific findings that people didn't know about when the bible was first written, so god did not want to confuse people with ideas they could not understand.

Anonymous wrote:

Muslima wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If gestational surrogate then why was he not claimed by biological parent(s)/father - he did not have Down's Syndrome, after all!

God could of used DNA from existing living humans or he could of just made an embryo from scratch(like he did with Adam and Eve) and implanted it into Mary.

I don't recall anything in the Bible about God making Adam and Eve from an embryo. Embryos are not mentioned in the bible at all, I'm almost positive. They are one of those scientific findings that people didn't know about when the bible was first written, so god did not want to confuse people with ideas they could not understand.

There's nothing about that in the bible either, but I've heard it explained that way by people trying to understand why the bible left out so much.

I didn't mean God made an embryo of Adam and Eve. I meant God made Adam and Eve from scratch. So given he can make things from scratch, he could of made an embryo from scratch as well.

If he can make things from scratch, you'd think he would have made them without error, but no - humans have all sorts of awful diseases and conditions.

God is a flawed creator

That was His Choice, He Does what He Wills......

Actually, it was Adam and Eve's choice not Gods.

Muslima wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If gestational surrogate then why was he not claimed by biological parent(s)/father - he did not have Down's Syndrome, after all!

God could of used DNA from existing living humans or he could of just made an embryo from scratch(like he did with Adam and Eve) and implanted it into Mary.

I don't recall anything in the Bible about God making Adam and Eve from an embryo. Embryos are not mentioned in the bible at all, I'm almost positive. They are one of those scientific findings that people didn't know about when the bible was first written, so god did not want to confuse people with ideas they could not understand.

There's nothing about that in the bible either, but I've heard it explained that way by people trying to understand why the bible left out so much.

I didn't mean God made an embryo of Adam and Eve. I meant God made Adam and Eve from scratch. So given he can make things from scratch, he could of made an embryo from scratch as well.

If he can make things from scratch, you'd think he would have made them without error, but no - humans have all sorts of awful diseases and conditions.

God is a flawed creator

That was His Choice, He Does what He Wills......

Muslima wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If gestational surrogate then why was he not claimed by biological parent(s)/father - he did not have Down's Syndrome, after all!

God could of used DNA from existing living humans or he could of just made an embryo from scratch(like he did with Adam and Eve) and implanted it into Mary.

I don't recall anything in the Bible about God making Adam and Eve from an embryo. Embryos are not mentioned in the bible at all, I'm almost positive. They are one of those scientific findings that people didn't know about when the bible was first written, so god did not want to confuse people with ideas they could not understand.

There's nothing about that in the bible either, but I've heard it explained that way by people trying to understand why the bible left out so much.

I didn't mean God made an embryo of Adam and Eve. I meant God made Adam and Eve from scratch. So given he can make things from scratch, he could of made an embryo from scratch as well.

If he can make things from scratch, you'd think he would have made them without error, but no - humans have all sorts of awful diseases and conditions.

God is a flawed creator

That was His Choice, He Does what He Wills......

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If gestational surrogate then why was he not claimed by biological parent(s)/father - he did not have Down's Syndrome, after all!

God could of used DNA from existing living humans or he could of just made an embryo from scratch(like he did with Adam and Eve) and implanted it into Mary.

I don't recall anything in the Bible about God making Adam and Eve from an embryo. Embryos are not mentioned in the bible at all, I'm almost positive. They are one of those scientific findings that people didn't know about when the bible was first written, so god did not want to confuse people with ideas they could not understand.

There's nothing about that in the bible either, but I've heard it explained that way by people trying to understand why the bible left out so much.

I didn't mean God made an embryo of Adam and Eve. I meant God made Adam and Eve from scratch. So given he can make things from scratch, he could of made an embryo from scratch as well.

If he can make things from scratch, you'd think he would have made them without error, but no - humans have all sorts of awful diseases and conditions.

God is a flawed creator

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If gestational surrogate then why was he not claimed by biological parent(s)/father - he did not have Down's Syndrome, after all!

God could of used DNA from existing living humans or he could of just made an embryo from scratch(like he did with Adam and Eve) and implanted it into Mary.

I don't recall anything in the Bible about God making Adam and Eve from an embryo. Embryos are not mentioned in the bible at all, I'm almost positive. They are one of those scientific findings that people didn't know about when the bible was first written, so god did not want to confuse people with ideas they could not understand.

There's nothing about that in the bible either, but I've heard it explained that way by people trying to understand why the bible left out so much.

I didn't mean God made an embryo of Adam and Eve. I meant God made Adam and Eve from scratch. So given he can make things from scratch, he could of made an embryo from scratch as well.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If gestational surrogate then why was he not claimed by biological parent(s)/father - he did not have Down's Syndrome, after all!

God could of used DNA from existing living humans or he could of just made an embryo from scratch(like he did with Adam and Eve) and implanted it into Mary.

I don't recall anything in the Bible about God making Adam and Eve from an embryo. Embryos are not mentioned in the bible at all, I'm almost positive. They are one of those scientific findings that people didn't know about when the bible was first written, so god did not want to confuse people with ideas they could not understand.

There's nothing about that in the bible either, but I've heard it explained that way by people trying to understand why the bible left out so much.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If gestational surrogate then why was he not claimed by biological parent(s)/father - he did not have Down's Syndrome, after all!

God could of used DNA from existing living humans or he could of just made an embryo from scratch(like he did with Adam and Eve) and implanted it into Mary.

Anonymous wrote:If gestational surrogate then why was he not claimed by biological parent(s)/father - he did not have Down's Syndrome, after all!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What a waste of time people. Bat-shit is right. If this is how you want to fill your few days on this earth, fine. Please know that if the universe has any record of your inane debates it will laugh. It's very human to want to know the root of one's existence, and very human to try and come up with an answer -- I forgive you all. Now, can we get down to living life and let this shit go already?

So your answer to the meaning of life is to spend your time on the Religion forum, despite being a non-believer, and to insult people there anonymously?

Uh, OK, seems like you've got it all figured out then.

maybe pp meant wasting time believing certain things -- not wasting time being on this forum. Perhaps pp spends very little time here and just pops in occasionally to see what people are up to.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What a waste of time people. Bat-shit is right. If this is how you want to fill your few days on this earth, fine. Please know that if the universe has any record of your inane debates it will laugh. It's very human to want to know the root of one's existence, and very human to try and come up with an answer -- I forgive you all. Now, can we get down to living life and let this shit go already?

So your answer to the meaning of life is to spend your time on the Religion forum, despite being a non-believer, and to insult people there anonymously?

Uh, OK, seems like you've got it all figured out then.

Anonymous wrote:What a waste of time people. Bat-shit is right. If this is how you want to fill your few days on this earth, fine. Please know that if the universe has any record of your inane debates it will laugh. It's very human to want to know the root of one's existence, and very human to try and come up with an answer -- I forgive you all. Now, can we get down to living life and let this shit go already?