Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. I like to do the opposite and it removes the whole keeping up with the jones.
+100000
OP, you have no ida what the situation you propose does to some people, mentally. Some people go into breakdowns over this. DON'T DO IT.
+1000 It is very lonely and a lot of explaining. "We are not going to the Caribbean for Christmas. Nor will we be visiting Vail. Nor can you accept an all expenses paid trip to Europe with your friend Isabella. No we are not doing the $15k summer camp with Sammy"
This makes me very sad. We bought a $700K teardown in a $1.2++ neighborhood. There are dark moments I wish for more, but we love making this house ours. We do much of the work ourselves including the landscaping. Our neighbors have been incredibly welcoming and compliment our efforts to improve the place. The neighborhood kids play at our house, not because it's the nicest place on the block with the best stuff, but because it's a happy place to be. It's true, we have lots of conversations about why DD can't take private horseback lessons or get French manicures every week. Sometimes these conversations leave me exhausted, but mostly I look at them as opportunities to talk about how lucky we are to have what we do. Wealth is relative. And there will always be someone richer, smarter, thinner, etc. None of that matters if you're right with yourself. I'd rather her learn that in life than how to surround herself with people exactly like her.
Unfortunately, it catches up with people sooner or later. It's not as easy as feeling you bought a bargain, in a close in neighborhood, unfortunately. It comes with a ton of baggage, physically and mentally, internally and externally, which most people are not able to handle. You can pretend everything is near perfect, but its not. Most people aren't right with themselves for long, if they are at the low end of the spectrum. Its common sense. You can't fit a square peg into a round hole.
We bought a house in a more expensive area than we probably should have and there are pluses and minuses. Main con is that we both need to work at least till kids are out of elementary and we'd prefer to have one parent at home. Also, the house needs larger renovations that will take time. There is also more of a competitive atmosphere than I'm used to. Pluses are that it's a large enough house for us to live in for many years, the neighborhood is safe and desirable, many nice families, lots of kids nearby, amenities and schools nearby, great school reputation, great aftercare at the school, walkable neighborhood near shopping, and it's convenient to many jobs in the DC area should one of us lose a job. Do I sometimes wish I could hang out at the pool and tennis court all summer? Sure, but every choice has drawbacks.
Anonymous wrote:I always buy the cheapest house in the best neighborhood....Doesn't that make me smarter than the rest of my neighbors? I live in 20817, Walt Whitman Cluster (20 yrs now) in an old midcentury on a half acre and Im happy as a clam that the people behind me just paid 3 million for their house....they just made me richer
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This sounds a bit like our neighborhood, where the houses go from $800K to almost $3 million. I think most people are just happy to see young families move in with kids who'll attend the local elementary school. It's a mish-mash best appreciated by people who don't expect everyone to fit the same mold.
Personally, having moved to the neighborhood from a subdivision further out in the suburbs where the houses were all built around the same time, the neighbors were, at least originally, all about the same age, and everyone was in your business constantly, I like it much better.
Your second paragraph is spot on, but your first paragraph is what the original hiuse owners want you to believe. You would be extremely naive to think that is what is really happening.
Anonymous wrote:This sounds a bit like our neighborhood, where the houses go from $800K to almost $3 million. I think most people are just happy to see young families move in with kids who'll attend the local elementary school. It's a mish-mash best appreciated by people who don't expect everyone to fit the same mold.
Personally, having moved to the neighborhood from a subdivision further out in the suburbs where the houses were all built around the same time, the neighbors were, at least originally, all about the same age, and everyone was in your business constantly, I like it much better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. I like to do the opposite and it removes the whole keeping up with the jones.
+100000
OP, you have no ida what the situation you propose does to some people, mentally. Some people go into breakdowns over this. DON'T DO IT.
+1000 It is very lonely and a lot of explaining. "We are not going to the Caribbean for Christmas. Nor will we be visiting Vail. Nor can you accept an all expenses paid trip to Europe with your friend Isabella. No we are not doing the $15k summer camp with Sammy"
This makes me very sad. We bought a $700K teardown in a $1.2++ neighborhood. There are dark moments I wish for more, but we love making this house ours. We do much of the work ourselves including the landscaping. Our neighbors have been incredibly welcoming and compliment our efforts to improve the place. The neighborhood kids play at our house, not because it's the nicest place on the block with the best stuff, but because it's a happy place to be. It's true, we have lots of conversations about why DD can't take private horseback lessons or get French manicures every week. Sometimes these conversations leave me exhausted, but mostly I look at them as opportunities to talk about how lucky we are to have what we do. Wealth is relative. And there will always be someone richer, smarter, thinner, etc. None of that matters if you're right with yourself. I'd rather her learn that in life than how to surround herself with people exactly like her.
Unfortunately, it catches up with people sooner or later. It's not as easy as feeling you bought a bargain, in a close in neighborhood, unfortunately. It comes with a ton of baggage, physically and mentally, internally and externally, which most people are not able to handle. You can pretend everything is near perfect, but its not. Most people aren't right with themselves for long, if they are at the low end of the spectrum. Its common sense. You can't fit a square peg into a round hole.
Anonymous wrote:
Really, I think your experience is colored by lawyers which are higher paid in Federal service. In my agency we have like 3 employees out of 150 who are Gs15; everyone else tops out at 130k. And most folks aren't making 130k by the time they are in their 30s, it takes time to work up to that for non lawyers/non doctors. Look at the one example on this thread; they are GS15 but bought in 2000, which mean they are in their 40s. young Genx and geny Feds have had years of pay freezes, smaller budgets, and such. Thy are not buying houses close in. No one in my office owns a SFH inside the beltway, I'm pretty sure, except PG county.
How many of these families in their 40s have young kids? Most neighborhoods with $1.2M+ homes are older. And they had their kids, like most people in their early 30s. I can't tell you how many times I have heard people say "there are just no kids in the neighborhood!" They are MS, teens or off at college, so not a great mix for the younger kid crowd.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Part of the problem here is that if you want a) good schools and b) short commute downtown, you are stuck with very expensive neighborhoods. Most middle income folks simply accept the lot of commuting long distances (which is why the 'where did the money come from' thread doesn't list any Federal employees, engineers, or teachers in who is buying close-in neighborhoods).
You are making the choice to value your time over having a nice house further out. That time you spend with your children may balance out the potential for income differences.
Also, even if you move to a neighborhood where people are similar to you in income; they may live off credit or splurge in general or go bonzo at wal-mart and mcdonalds and you might be someone who lives simply; you still won't fit in. But now you are stuck driving much longer!
You're foolish if you dont think McLean, N Arlington and Bethesda have numerous dual GS-15 Federal Employees. In fact, most ghovernment workers in the DC Area are GS-14 or above, which means a two fed household is 250K to 315K....
+1. Line in McLean Hamlet where the homes are more reasonable (under $1 M average) Lots of GS-14 and GS-15 families, government lawyers etc. Some with SAHM....
My neighbors are both feds - one is SES and one is GS-15. I am sure their Household income is about $350,000 but they bought their house for 450,000 back in 2000
Really, I think your experience is colored by lawyers which are higher paid in Federal service. In my agency we have like 3 employees out of 150 who are Gs15; everyone else tops out at 130k. And most folks aren't making 130k by the time they are in their 30s, it takes time to work up to that for non lawyers/non doctors. Look at the one example on this thread; they are GS15 but bought in 2000, which mean they are in their 40s. young Genx and geny Feds have had years of pay freezes, smaller budgets, and such. Thy are not buying houses close in. No one in my office owns a SFH inside the beltway, I'm pretty sure, except PG county.
