Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FBI
CIA
Except isn't that one of those jobs you can't tell anyone about? Is it still prestigious if no one knows? (If a tree falls in the woods with no one there to hear, does it make a noise, lol?)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FBI
CIA
Except isn't that one of those jobs you can't tell anyone about? Is it still prestigious if no one knows? (If a tree falls in the woods with no one there to hear, does it make a noise, lol?)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:FBI
CIA
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For lawyers, they are DOJ jobs.
LOL no. the average lawyer is doing doc review or working shitlaw for 45-55k. DOJ is hitting the lottery, salary wise.
Anonymous wrote:FBI
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For lawyers, they are DOJ jobs.
Lateral attorneys at DOJ with only a few years experience easily make six figure salaries. Based on recent numbers I saw in a job listing for the Civil Rights Division, with only four years experience, a newly hired lateral attorney at DOJ could have a starting salary of $120k. Does this really count as "low-paying"? Even if it's a lot less than a big-firm lawyer would make, those lawyers are already the exception rather than the rule in the legal profession.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe not exactly a "prestige job" but highly respected:
Staff Psychologist within the counseling center of an elite University. The work is very rewarding. Everyone has an advanced level degree, in most cases a doctorate. Looks great on a resume. Pay is crap, though. Salaries start at 40-60k and rarely climb above $80k.The saving grace is that the hours typically aren't bad so many of us supplement with private practice.
How is this highly respected, exactly? I work at a university and I don't even have a clue how many/who the counselors are.
I think it may be respected in your circle, but that's not at all a "prestige" job.
Um, okay. I didn't say it was a prestige job. I guess I naively assumed that a job requiring a PhD that entails years of clinical training would be highly respected. Guess you told me otherwise. Good to know.
I'm a psychologist (PhD), too, and thanks to the APA, respect for the profession has really eroded. And it's hard to argue with that when anyone can become a "psychologist."
Really? Anyone can become a psychologist? Not to derail this thread but that's hardly true. But thanks for undermining the profession even further with hyperbolic generalities.
Anonymous wrote:I'm sure there are people who will disagree, but I think the APA has done psychologists an enormous disservice by accrediting lousy diploma mills (schools of "professional psychology") that have very little quality control for faculty or students. So, they churn out people who are ill-qualified for the profession, which gives us all a bad name. Don't get me wrong, I think there are excellent psychologists out there, and I'm proud to be a psychologist. It's just that decent clinical psych programs are highly selective for a reason, i.e., it takes more than intellectual ability to be a good psychologist, at least those of us who provide psychotherapy.
That, and the APA has consistently refused to repudiate the use of torture in prisoner interrogations. That's a worse sin, but not one that's gotten much attention. So, yeah, not a fan of the APA here.
I knew one of those. He had a GED + this degree. As a psychologist he was completely juvenile as well as always stoned, and sounded like he dropped out of HS, which he did. I finally figured this out. He was the husband od an acquaintance. Wow, they let him treat patients???

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For lawyers, they are DOJ jobs.
LOL no. the average lawyer is doing doc review or working shitlaw for 45-55k. DOJ is hitting the lottery, salary wise.
I'm sure there are people who will disagree, but I think the APA has done psychologists an enormous disservice by accrediting lousy diploma mills (schools of "professional psychology") that have very little quality control for faculty or students. So, they churn out people who are ill-qualified for the profession, which gives us all a bad name. Don't get me wrong, I think there are excellent psychologists out there, and I'm proud to be a psychologist. It's just that decent clinical psych programs are highly selective for a reason, i.e., it takes more than intellectual ability to be a good psychologist, at least those of us who provide psychotherapy.
That, and the APA has consistently refused to repudiate the use of torture in prisoner interrogations. That's a worse sin, but not one that's gotten much attention. So, yeah, not a fan of the APA here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe not exactly a "prestige job" but highly respected:
Staff Psychologist within the counseling center of an elite University. The work is very rewarding. Everyone has an advanced level degree, in most cases a doctorate. Looks great on a resume. Pay is crap, though. Salaries start at 40-60k and rarely climb above $80k.The saving grace is that the hours typically aren't bad so many of us supplement with private practice.
How is this highly respected, exactly? I work at a university and I don't even have a clue how many/who the counselors are.
I think it may be respected in your circle, but that's not at all a "prestige" job.
Um, okay. I didn't say it was a prestige job. I guess I naively assumed that a job requiring a PhD that entails years of clinical training would be highly respected. Guess you told me otherwise. Good to know.
I'm a psychologist (PhD), too, and thanks to the APA, respect for the profession has really eroded. And it's hard to argue with that when anyone can become a "psychologist."
Really? Anyone can become a psychologist? Not to derail this thread but that's hardly true. But thanks for undermining the profession even further with hyperbolic generalities.
Are you also the "Um, okay," poster? If so, you really come off like a jerk with a chip on your shoulder.