Anonymous wrote:I wish the militants of all types would put a sock in it. The proselytizing religious people and the militant atheists.
(FWIW, I'm religious)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I've never done that and don't even believe that's what would happen to a non-believer who lived a good life. But I've certainly been repeatedly told by militant atheist that I can't possibly, as an intelligent person, believe in God.
So that proves there are some "militant atheists" and some militant/evangelical/proselytizing Christians who should only talk to people that agree with them, and some people on both sides who are less unpleasant when engaging "across the aisle" as it were. I don't think either side has a monopoly on either of those attitudes.
Definitely. I have yet to meet a militant agnostic, though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I've never done that and don't even believe that's what would happen to a non-believer who lived a good life. But I've certainly been repeatedly told by militant atheist that I can't possibly, as an intelligent person, believe in God.
So that proves there are some "militant atheists" and some militant/evangelical/proselytizing Christians who should only talk to people that agree with them, and some people on both sides who are less unpleasant when engaging "across the aisle" as it were. I don't think either side has a monopoly on either of those attitudes.
Definitely. I have yet to meet a militant agnostic, though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I've never done that and don't even believe that's what would happen to a non-believer who lived a good life. But I've certainly been repeatedly told by militant atheist that I can't possibly, as an intelligent person, believe in God.
So that proves there are some "militant atheists" and some militant/evangelical/proselytizing Christians who should only talk to people that agree with them, and some people on both sides who are less unpleasant when engaging "across the aisle" as it were. I don't think either side has a monopoly on either of those attitudes.
Anonymous wrote:
I've never done that and don't even believe that's what would happen to a non-believer who lived a good life. But I've certainly been repeatedly told by militant atheist that I can't possibly, as an intelligent person, believe in God.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:takoma wrote:Incidentally, I could just as well describe myself as believing in God as an indescribable entity (intelligence? force? being?) that is responsible for the cretion of the universe and the laws by which it runs -- God the prime mover. I further believe that this entity is so far beyond our ken that to think it walks with me and talks with me is incredibly self-aggrandizing.
So, if it makes anyone feel better about me, feel free to call me a deist rather than an atheist.
My point, in case it's not obvious, is that "God" means different things to different people, so I too can define "God" to be what I believe.
Pleased to hear from you. I'm a religious person --Catholic, in fact.
If it makes anyone feel better, think of atheists as agnostics instead of atheists, because neither one believes in god, but agnostic sounds better than atheist.
Not the same thing. I've never had an agnostic tell me I was stupid for being a believer.
That is not a defining characteristic of an atheist either, any more than telling people they will burn in hell for not believing in God is a defining characteristic of a Christian.
Anonymous wrote:New PP. I think even Richard Dawkins has said, on rare occasions, that he's technically an agnostic because nobody can be completely sure that God doesn't exist. He doesn't feel comfortable claiming agnosticism, though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:takoma wrote:Incidentally, I could just as well describe myself as believing in God as an indescribable entity (intelligence? force? being?) that is responsible for the cretion of the universe and the laws by which it runs -- God the prime mover. I further believe that this entity is so far beyond our ken that to think it walks with me and talks with me is incredibly self-aggrandizing.
So, if it makes anyone feel better about me, feel free to call me a deist rather than an atheist.
My point, in case it's not obvious, is that "God" means different things to different people, so I too can define "God" to be what I believe.
Pleased to hear from you. I'm a religious person --Catholic, in fact.
If it makes anyone feel better, think of atheists as agnostics instead of atheists, because neither one believes in god, but agnostic sounds better than atheist.
Not the same thing. I've never had an agnostic tell me I was stupid for being a believer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:takoma wrote:Incidentally, I could just as well describe myself as believing in God as an indescribable entity (intelligence? force? being?) that is responsible for the cretion of the universe and the laws by which it runs -- God the prime mover. I further believe that this entity is so far beyond our ken that to think it walks with me and talks with me is incredibly self-aggrandizing.
So, if it makes anyone feel better about me, feel free to call me a deist rather than an atheist.
My point, in case it's not obvious, is that "God" means different things to different people, so I too can define "God" to be what I believe.
Pleased to hear from you. I'm a religious person --Catholic, in fact.
If it makes anyone feel better, think of atheists as agnostics instead of atheists, because neither one believes in god, but agnostic sounds better than atheist.
Anonymous wrote:takoma wrote:Incidentally, I could just as well describe myself as believing in God as an indescribable entity (intelligence? force? being?) that is responsible for the cretion of the universe and the laws by which it runs -- God the prime mover. I further believe that this entity is so far beyond our ken that to think it walks with me and talks with me is incredibly self-aggrandizing.
So, if it makes anyone feel better about me, feel free to call me a deist rather than an atheist.
My point, in case it's not obvious, is that "God" means different things to different people, so I too can define "God" to be what I believe.
Pleased to hear from you. I'm a religious person --Catholic, in fact.
takoma wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pleased to hear from you. I'm a religious person --Catholic, in fact.
The difference that bothers me is not between Catholic and atheist, Jew. Muslim, or whatever, but between tolerance and intolerance. I would hate to be banished to an atheist form where I could not talk to people like you about what makes us tick in our own individual ways.
Anonymous wrote:Pleased to hear from you. I'm a religious person --Catholic, in fact.
takoma wrote:Incidentally, I could just as well describe myself as believing in God as an indescribable entity (intelligence? force? being?) that is responsible for the cretion of the universe and the laws by which it runs -- God the prime mover. I further believe that this entity is so far beyond our ken that to think it walks with me and talks with me is incredibly self-aggrandizing.
So, if it makes anyone feel better about me, feel free to call me a deist rather than an atheist.
My point, in case it's not obvious, is that "God" means different things to different people, so I too can define "God" to be what I believe.