Anonymous wrote:Original poster here.
Looking back, I think I was more concerned about the fact that I worked for Contractor A, who lost the contract to Contractor B. I was then hired by Contractor B, who did not tell me that I would be working with my former employer Contractor A. I wanted no impropriety or fraternization outside of work with Contractor A. It was a contentious relationship between the two companies, Contractor A and Contractor B. That is why I wanted to keep my Contractor B employer HR in the loop, that Contractor A was inviting me (as a date or not) outside of work for drinks and dinner, and that I politely declined and was not encouraging that behavior. By them firing me, it seemed to me they weren't supportive of me if the Contractor A dude did escalate his behavior. And I have never been harassed because I don't put myself in those situations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You deserve to be fired if you reported someone for just asking you for a drink.
I have never heard anything so ridiculous.
I did not report him to HR. I simply wanted HR to know that since he worked for my previous employer, I turned him down for drinks and dinner and that I was not interested in socializing with him outside of work. I had no idea whether he would progress or escalate his invitations and I did not want my employer to think I was encouraging him.
Why can't dudes who are twenty and thirty years older than their captive office mates, find people their own age and outside of work to date?
Anonymous wrote:Original poster here.
Looking back, I think I was more concerned about the fact that I worked for Contractor A, who lost the contract to Contractor B. I was then hired by Contractor B, who did not tell me that I would be working with my former employer Contractor A. I wanted no impropriety or fraternization outside of work with Contractor A. It was a contentious relationship between the two companies, Contractor A and Contractor B. That is why I wanted to keep my Contractor B employer HR in the loop, that Contractor A was inviting me (as a date or not) outside of work for drinks and dinner, and that I politely declined and was not encouraging that behavior. By them firing me, it seemed to me they weren't supportive of me if the Contractor A dude did escalate his behavior. And I have never been harassed because I don't put myself in those situations.
Anonymous wrote:Original poster here.
Looking back, I think I was more concerned about the fact that I worked for Contractor A, who lost the contract to Contractor B. I was then hired by Contractor B, who did not tell me that I would be working with my former employer Contractor A. I wanted no impropriety or fraternization outside of work with Contractor A. It was a contentious relationship between the two companies, Contractor A and Contractor B. That is why I wanted to keep my Contractor B employer HR in the loop, that Contractor A was inviting me (as a date or not) outside of work for drinks and dinner, and that I politely declined and was not encouraging that behavior. By them firing me, it seemed to me they weren't supportive of me if the Contractor A dude did escalate his behavior. And I have never been harassed because I don't put myself in those situations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Original poster here.
Looking back, I think I was more concerned about the fact that I worked for Contractor A, who lost the contract to Contractor B. I was then hired by Contractor B, who did not tell me that I would be working with my former employer Contractor A. I wanted no impropriety or fraternization outside of work with Contractor A. It was a contentious relationship between the two companies, Contractor A and Contractor B. That is why I wanted to keep my Contractor B employer HR in the loop, that Contractor A was inviting me (as a date or not) outside of work for drinks and dinner, and that I politely declined and was not encouraging that behavior. By them firing me, it seemed to me they weren't supportive of me if the Contractor A dude did escalate his behavior. And I have never been harassed because I don't put myself in those situations.
I'm not going to touch this one. Anyone else?
Anonymous wrote:Original poster here.
Looking back, I think I was more concerned about the fact that I worked for Contractor A, who lost the contract to Contractor B. I was then hired by Contractor B, who did not tell me that I would be working with my former employer Contractor A. I wanted no impropriety or fraternization outside of work with Contractor A. It was a contentious relationship between the two companies, Contractor A and Contractor B. That is why I wanted to keep my Contractor B employer HR in the loop, that Contractor A was inviting me (as a date or not) outside of work for drinks and dinner, and that I politely declined and was not encouraging that behavior. By them firing me, it seemed to me they weren't supportive of me if the Contractor A dude did escalate his behavior. And I have never been harassed because I don't put myself in those situations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You said no. That was the end of it. Why in the world did you take this to hr? It wasn't harassment.
Yea, why?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Being invited for a drink is not a reportable "offense". What did you hope to gain by reporting it to HR? Now if you declined and he then harassed you or retaliated in some way that would be different.
Frankly, if I were your manager I'd view you as a potential trouble maker and want to get rid of you pronto.
I think that's exactly what happened.
Anonymous wrote:You said no. That was the end of it. Why in the world did you take this to hr? It wasn't harassment.
Anonymous wrote:Everyone is missing out on asking the main question:
OP: Are you hot?