Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Problem is you're talking about HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS. What do you expect from them? Same with high school boys. Are they going for the shy nerdy girl with straight As?
Late teens and early twenties are women have the most options and fewer mercenary concerns about long term stability. So that's when their choices should be most representative of what they find attractive in a partner they want to have sex with.
Guys remain fairly stable and predictable in what they will say they find sexually attractive in a woman over the years.
Anonymous wrote:I want a man who makes me feel good, in many many different ways. Who feeds my brain with mental stimulation... who feeds my heart with loving attention... who fills my days with good company, adventures, good quiet time, leave me alone time (when I need it)... who feeds my body with good foods (if he can cook!) and all that good sexual attention... and who feeds our kids with awesome parenting...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Problem is you're talking about HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS. What do you expect from them? Same with high school boys. Are they going for the shy nerdy girl with straight As?
Late teens and early twenties are women have the most options and fewer mercenary concerns about long term stability. So that's when their choices should be most representative of what they find attractive in a partner they want to have sex with.
Guys remain fairly stable and predictable in what they will say they find sexually attractive in a woman over the years.
Anonymous wrote:Problem is you're talking about HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS. What do you expect from them? Same with high school boys. Are they going for the shy nerdy girl with straight As?
Anonymous wrote:You know, it is a stereotype that chess nerds are all well mannered, respectful, etc. especially in the awkward teen years. There are plenty of intellectually arrogant people, especially in adolescence, and that can make a guy hard to approach or difficult to spend time with.
And then a lot of quite nice chess guy types have a too defeatist attitude, referring to themselves as betas, griping about some other guys life over there instead of enjoying their own lives and appreciating their own good qualities. Or assuming defeat without trying, or only valuing a woman by physical appearance without knowing anything about her actual self. I broke up with a guy over these issues once. He talked himself out of things, and seemed to assume my looks were as important to me as to him. He was too deep in this rut to take a different perspective.
Never was interested in jocks, but as a married mom, I note that a lot of dads who seem really great appear to have jock backgrounds.
Anonymous wrote:Guys get mixed messages about what women want. And when I say what they want, I mean "what they want in a guy with whom they'd like to have sex."
For example, in high school and college, I was peppered with messages about treating women with respect and as equals. But my observation was that they'd primarily seek out, dote on, and flirt with the jocks, regardless of whether those guys treated them respectfully and as equals. Now, I know, ideally, a woman is probably going to want a confident, athletic guy who treats them with respect and as an equal. But, when push came to shove, the women I knew would pick the confident, athletic guy who did not treat them with respect over, say, the shy chess nerd who did treat them with respect and as equals.
It's been a long time since I was in high school or college, so my observations would be so much ancient history. I am happily married and not looking to attract anyone but my wife. However, I've seen the debates heating up lately with feminists on one side and Mens Rights Activists on the other side. Feminists are pro-equality and respect. MRAs are saying, "bullshit, women are attracted to assholes." It's of some importance because when guys like myself are taking sides in the culture wars and on decisions of politics and policy, we (or at least I) think that feminists have the better rational position. But, on an emotional level, think that women aren't really being fully honest about how they want to be treated by men. And so, the MRAs have some resonance when they suggest that, while women say they want to be treated as equals, what they really respond to is strength.
So, what's the deal with picking the bad boys and the asshole jocks over the nice guys? I'm convinced that the MRAs are primarily misogynists and assholes. I would like to also be convinced that they are wrong about what women truly desire and find sexually attractive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hate this asshole jock vs shy nerd dichotomy. It is SUCH a false dichotomy, like all the women here have pointed out.
We want confidence, intelligence, and a man who is comfortable in his own skin.
Guess what? If you're either shy or an asshole, you are NOT confident (yes, assholes are not confident) and you are not comfortable in your own skin. So neither of them qualify.
Whether you are a high powered lawyer or the girl behind a McDonald's counter, women want a man who makes them feel safe and protected. A man with a strong inner core with beliefs to match. Period, end of story.