Anonymous wrote:I want to take down a old home and then fill in a basement and put a cement slap down and then a 3. Bedroom 2 bathroom house with a 2 1/2 car garage on here
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Building yourself is cheaper. We had a 1.6m budget in mclean. After looking at homes at that range we ended up buying a 800k lot and building for 800k for a 7000sf house. House appraised at 2.3M. if we bought new construction it would have been 2.3m way out of our budget.
What builder did you use and were you happy? High, medium or low end finishes?
Anonymous wrote:Yes always cheaper to teardown and build
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, in-close in, well-established neighborhoods, 20 mins to DC, how much does a well maintained 2500 house on 1.2 acres in desirable neighborhood cost to builder (i.e., how much will builder pay to re-build or tear down) approximately. Thanks.
OP, thanks for starting this thread, as it is a worthy question currently.
The condition of your current home will be almost irrelevant to a builder if they are planning to tear it down. A builder is going to pay the same price as everyone else - ie, the market price for buying the house. If anything, a poorly maintained home would be more attractive as it would deter competition for the home and allow the builder to push for a low price. This holds true for anyone wanting to buy a home to tear down.
The cost to build depends on site work, labor, and materials. However, those prices don't change a whole lot in comparison to the price of the lot. The cost to build on a $1 million lot in McLean versus a $30,000 lot in Gainesville would be comparable for the same size and quality of materials. The difference in final sale price is the value of the land and its location.
There is always a cost benefit analysis to the cost of acquiring a property, the cost to build something new, the amount of expected gain, and how much that home could go for. Just because someone spends $1 million to build a home doesn't mean it is worth that price in the market. This holds true for renovations as well. Many people have made the mistake of over doing their home in relation to their neighborhood.
Homes on lots more than 1 mil are humongous, because builders have to make money on the sale by selling luxury and more sq.ft. This spells trouble for owners wanting new a build on their lot, because they have to build huge and it will be around 2 mil just to build. This is our conundrum and why we cannot afford to build. If we build a small house (small is 4K sq.ft for our area) then it won't sell when we move and we may lose money, although there is a lot of demand for cheaper new homes, more than for $$$$ new homes. It's just what the area commands, big luxury homes. Builder will want to make money either way if they build small or big, but will you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, in-close in, well-established neighborhoods, 20 mins to DC, how much does a well maintained 2500 house on 1.2 acres in desirable neighborhood cost to builder (i.e., how much will builder pay to re-build or tear down) approximately. Thanks.
OP, thanks for starting this thread, as it is a worthy question currently.
The condition of your current home will be almost irrelevant to a builder if they are planning to tear it down. A builder is going to pay the same price as everyone else - ie, the market price for buying the house. If anything, a poorly maintained home would be more attractive as it would deter competition for the home and allow the builder to push for a low price. This holds true for anyone wanting to buy a home to tear down.
The cost to build depends on site work, labor, and materials. However, those prices don't change a whole lot in comparison to the price of the lot. The cost to build on a $1 million lot in McLean versus a $30,000 lot in Gainesville would be comparable for the same size and quality of materials. The difference in final sale price is the value of the land and its location.
There is always a cost benefit analysis to the cost of acquiring a property, the cost to build something new, the amount of expected gain, and how much that home could go for. Just because someone spends $1 million to build a home doesn't mean it is worth that price in the market. This holds true for renovations as well. Many people have made the mistake of over doing their home in relation to their neighborhood.
Anonymous wrote:I’ve noticed that the resale of a custom home is less and a brand new build. I think the custom home loses vale since it’s been lived in and ppl who want new for the sake of new will not consider it.
A house built new in 2014 will look considerably dated to a 2018 -2019 home.
Ppl around here base their perceived cache on their house. They are willing to spend $$$$ on a house that isn’t really that great.
Anonymous wrote:Building yourself is cheaper. We had a 1.6m budget in mclean. After looking at homes at that range we ended up buying a 800k lot and building for 800k for a 7000sf house. House appraised at 2.3M. if we bought new construction it would have been 2.3m way out of our budget.