Anonymous wrote:My parents have been nagging and bickering for 42 years. They would do anything for us. I am an only child.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My parents have been nagging and bickering for 42 years. They would do anything for us. I am an only child.
Ha! Sounds just like my parents, except I'm not an only child.
The way my parents relate to each other is so odd that I couldn't tell you whether they are happily married. But they love each other, are completely devoted to their kids, and will surely be a big help when my baby, their first grandchild, is born.
Anonymous wrote:My parents have been nagging and bickering for 42 years. They would do anything for us. I am an only child.
Anonymous wrote:Trend? You call trend family dynamics that exist since the beginning of time in all cultures on Earth?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reading some of the comments. Why are your parents and Il laws responsible for providing time so you can work on your marriage? Why can't you swap with friends or hire out?
I always thought the primary purpose of have helpful and engaged grandparents was fostering the relationship between the grandchild and grandparent- not providing couple time for the parents. This must be a relatively new concept- post Gen X.
They are not RESPONSIBLE, but it's a really thoughtful gesture. I don't think anyone would say that the grand parents are responsible, but there are grandparents out there who do say, "It's important/good/healthy for you and DH to get out once in a while. Go, have fun, and we'll take care of the kids." This is such a stark difference compared to grandparents (like mine), who flat out refuse to babysit because they are DONE with child-rearing. Just wondering what produces such a different attitude in grandparents. Personally, I hope to be more like the former when my kids grow up and have kids of their own.
I am not agreeing with you, OP. I am the 9:28 poster. I am a capable adult and I can manage my marriage just fine, thanks, b/c my parents raised me that way and I don't need their help in that regard. I feel it sounds needy of you to view it that way. That would feel intrusive to me, in fact.
Interesting that you would characterize this as needy as opposed to nice or helpful. IMO, there is a little too much insularity and not enough community when it comes to families being there for each other these days, not just in times of crisis.
I can agree with this, but with the trend of grandparents caring for grandchildren (or parents helping out their children, who are now parents), this is generally a one-way street. For people that have parents or other relatives that help out, do you give back? Do you also make it important to return help, or just give help to your parents and relatives? Most of the time, people expect their parents and relatives to help out, even if it's only on occasion (1-2x a week is not "on occasion"), but there's no reciprocity.
I'm not a grandparent, but I'm in my 30s with deceased parents. I feel like a lot of people in my generation take their own parents for granted. Sure, I understand a lot of people have toxic families and that's a different dynamic. But for those fellow adults that have a decent relationship with their family and still expect their parents to take care of them... that's mind boggling to me. Your parents have done their job. Your kids are your own responsibility. Family being there for each other is a great concept, but it has to go both ways. Even if you're an adult, and your parents are adults - it's gotta be reciprocal.
Anonymous wrote:In my empirical evidence, I am going to have to conclude the opposite, OP:
1) My parents -- happily married, don't help THAT much, will help but definitely rely on us and trust us to be capable, confident adult who can handle ordinary problems as they arise
2) My in-laws -- not happily married, are unhappy in their lives and their relationship, seek to find meaning in their lives by excessively spilling over the boundaries b/w their (unhappy) coupling and our personal nuclear family. Thus, it looks like, on the surface, they "help" a lot, but we don't want their "help" b/c it comes from a place of neediness in themselves, not a place of confidence and fulfillment.
Anonymous wrote:My theory on this is that happily married grandparents may be more likely to help. Some of this may be that they have a good marriage, and enjoy seeing their spouse interact with their grandchildren.
My Dh and I take care of our two grandkids two nights a week----- These are overnights on school nights. We love it. They add energy to our empty nest and I love seeing my DH doing all the things he used to do with our kids: reading, helping with homework, playing, etc.
It brings us closer.
So I see that as one reason that happily married grandparents help out. They enjoy being with their spouse and the grandkids at once. Plus two people makes the "work" part easier.
Anonymous wrote:Trend? You call trend family dynamics that exist since the beginning of time in all cultures on Earth?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reading some of the comments. Why are your parents and Il laws responsible for providing time so you can work on your marriage? Why can't you swap with friends or hire out?
I always thought the primary purpose of have helpful and engaged grandparents was fostering the relationship between the grandchild and grandparent- not providing couple time for the parents. This must be a relatively new concept- post Gen X.
They are not RESPONSIBLE, but it's a really thoughtful gesture. I don't think anyone would say that the grand parents are responsible, but there are grandparents out there who do say, "It's important/good/healthy for you and DH to get out once in a while. Go, have fun, and we'll take care of the kids." This is such a stark difference compared to grandparents (like mine), who flat out refuse to babysit because they are DONE with child-rearing. Just wondering what produces such a different attitude in grandparents. Personally, I hope to be more like the former when my kids grow up and have kids of their own.
I am not agreeing with you, OP. I am the 9:28 poster. I am a capable adult and I can manage my marriage just fine, thanks, b/c my parents raised me that way and I don't need their help in that regard. I feel it sounds needy of you to view it that way. That would feel intrusive to me, in fact.
Interesting that you would characterize this as needy as opposed to nice or helpful. IMO, there is a little too much insularity and not enough community when it comes to families being there for each other these days, not just in times of crisis.
I can agree with this, but with the trend of grandparents caring for grandchildren (or parents helping out their children, who are now parents), this is generally a one-way street. For people that have parents or other relatives that help out, do you give back? Do you also make it important to return help, or just give help to your parents and relatives? Most of the time, people expect their parents and relatives to help out, even if it's only on occasion (1-2x a week is not "on occasion"), but there's no reciprocity.
I'm not a grandparent, but I'm in my 30s with deceased parents. I feel like a lot of people in my generation take their own parents for granted. Sure, I understand a lot of people have toxic families and that's a different dynamic. But for those fellow adults that have a decent relationship with their family and still expect their parents to take care of them... that's mind boggling to me. Your parents have done their job. Your kids are your own responsibility. Family being there for each other is a great concept, but it has to go both ways. Even if you're an adult, and your parents are adults - it's gotta be reciprocal.