Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good.
Posted from the US House of Representatives. Your government at work.
Unbelievable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good.
Posted from the US House of Representatives. Your government at work.
And your snide comment was juvenile and inappropriate for a board moderator.
I'm not sure how I feel about a moderator who uses his 'powers' to 'out' someone in such a fashion.
+1. I agree that the remark was repugnant, but a big part of what makes DCUM what it is (the good and the bad) is that people feel free to post anonymously. Perhaps in this case, Jeff quasi-outed someone for stating something that most of us would agree is morally reprehensible. But it could still have the effect of chilling speech, because there's no saying when Jeff will choose to exercise those powers. And I think part of me is disappointed because I thought Jeff was above that sort of thing.
+ 1
I agree. I am never going to be comfortable again writing anything that will not show me in a good light. That means that I have to be PC all the time. The anonymity of this forum was the best part of this forum. Yes - there are conflicts and wars - but there are also honest give and take. And I would rather hear the real reasons why someone disagrees with me, rather than be presented with the polite mask that we are presented with everyday IRL.
I also thought that Jeff was above something like that. However, DCUM has brought out the best and the worst in all of us - one time or another - and so I think we can let it go this once.
I appreciate when Jeff cleans up after us (deleting threads and locking threads) - I think as a moderator that is a great work. However, let the anonymity be maintained. Don't call out posters in this way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is not something to joke about. A child died. My friend was one of his teachers in Baltimore.
Agreed. These are probably some of the same women who had such empathy for the drugged out white teens from the heroin thread. Bunch of effing racist hypocrites.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good.
Posted from the US House of Representatives. Your government at work.
And your snide comment was juvenile and inappropriate for a board moderator.
I'm not sure how I feel about a moderator who uses his 'powers' to 'out' someone in such a fashion.
+1. I agree that the remark was repugnant, but a big part of what makes DCUM what it is (the good and the bad) is that people feel free to post anonymously. Perhaps in this case, Jeff quasi-outed someone for stating something that most of us would agree is morally reprehensible. But it could still have the effect of chilling speech, because there's no saying when Jeff will choose to exercise those powers. And I think part of me is disappointed because I thought Jeff was above that sort of thing.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm the "Good" poster, and this is my only other post on this thread since then.
My knee-jerk reaction was along the lines of "what goes around comes around," but it wasn't a kind thing to say and I regret it.
Jeff posting the location from where you posted that comment had you peeing in your seat. I would have loved to have been your cube mate when you read Jeff's post. I'm sure all of the blood drained out of your body and you imagined a scenario where everyone with whom you work knew your true feeling about a 14 year old who's only known misstep was to have a father who is a feckless criminal. I hope you were sufficiently spooked and now realize that ANYTHING posted on the "internets" is fair game.
While you may have publicly stated that you regret the comment, I believe you only posted that because Jeff semi-outed you; not that I agree with Jeff's actions but it was a nice treat.![]()
You are probably reading too much into this. I prefer to take her at her word and accept that she made a hasty post that she later regretted. She at least stepped and admitted the error. I'll give her credit for that.
How do you know the person's gender?
Anonymous wrote:More outing. Could we change the default status to something akin to the truth, such as: "semi-anonymous" or "anonymous only when Jeff feels like it or agrees with your politics" ??
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm the "Good" poster, and this is my only other post on this thread since then.
My knee-jerk reaction was along the lines of "what goes around comes around," but it wasn't a kind thing to say and I regret it.
Jeff posting the location from where you posted that comment had you peeing in your seat. I would have loved to have been your cube mate when you read Jeff's post. I'm sure all of the blood drained out of your body and you imagined a scenario where everyone with whom you work knew your true feeling about a 14 year old who's only known misstep was to have a father who is a feckless criminal. I hope you were sufficiently spooked and now realize that ANYTHING posted on the "internets" is fair game.
While you may have publicly stated that you regret the comment, I believe you only posted that because Jeff semi-outed you; not that I agree with Jeff's actions but it was a nice treat.![]()
You are probably reading too much into this. I prefer to take her at her word and accept that she made a hasty post that she later regretted. She at least stepped and admitted the error. I'll give her credit for that.
How do you know the person's gender?
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm the "Good" poster, and this is my only other post on this thread since then.
My knee-jerk reaction was along the lines of "what goes around comes around," but it wasn't a kind thing to say and I regret it.
Jeff posting the location from where you posted that comment had you peeing in your seat. I would have loved to have been your cube mate when you read Jeff's post. I'm sure all of the blood drained out of your body and you imagined a scenario where everyone with whom you work knew your true feeling about a 14 year old who's only known misstep was to have a father who is a feckless criminal. I hope you were sufficiently spooked and now realize that ANYTHING posted on the "internets" is fair game.
While you may have publicly stated that you regret the comment, I believe you only posted that because Jeff semi-outed you; not that I agree with Jeff's actions but it was a nice treat.![]()
You are probably reading too much into this. I prefer to take her at her word and accept that she made a hasty post that she later regretted. She at least stepped and admitted the error. I'll give her credit for that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good.
Posted from the US House of Representatives. Your government at work.
And your snide comment was juvenile and inappropriate for a board moderator.
I'm not sure how I feel about a moderator who uses his 'powers' to 'out' someone in such a fashion.
Protip: Posting as "anonymous" doesn't mean you're actually anonymous. If you wouldn't want it attached to your name, don't put it on the internet. Period.
I think arbitrary 'outing' based on personal bias is not someplace I would go.
I don't think that outing someone who is insensitive to the killing of a 14 year old is a "personal bias". I would hope that we all have the same bias. Please let me be right about this one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good.
Posted from the US House of Representatives. Your government at work.
And your snide comment was juvenile and inappropriate for a board moderator.
I'm not sure how I feel about a moderator who uses his 'powers' to 'out' someone in such a fashion.
+1. I agree that the remark was repugnant, but a big part of what makes DCUM what it is (the good and the bad) is that people feel free to post anonymously. Perhaps in this case, Jeff quasi-outed someone for stating something that most of us would agree is morally reprehensible. But it could still have the effect of chilling speech, because there's no saying when Jeff will choose to exercise those powers. And I think part of me is disappointed because I thought Jeff was above that sort of thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good.
Posted from the US House of Representatives. Your government at work.
And your snide comment was juvenile and inappropriate for a board moderator.
I'm not sure how I feel about a moderator who uses his 'powers' to 'out' someone in such a fashion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
If anything I hope that this tragedy gets the father and/or other members of the community to rethink/reverse the "stop snitching" message. So sad.
It won't. The people in Baltimore who made the Stop Fucking Snitching video are no strangers to being the victims of violence, but they believe in vigilante justice, not going to the police. The family probably already knows who shot the boy (even though the police don't or don't have admissible evidence to charge somebody with it) and are looking to get even. It's the tit-for-tat of the Stop Snitching culture in certain parts of Baltimore that is the cause of so much violence.
Wow, you're making a TON of assumptions here. Just stop.
Not PP, but have you ever watched one of the Stop Snitchen videos? Do you even know what it is or anything about its creator?? I am from Baltimore BTW. Those are not mere assumptions. Come back when you get a clue as to what's being discussed.
And of course it's always sad when a 14 year old is hurt or killed.
Those videos have NOTHING to do with your assumption that this family knows who did this and that they're choosing street justice over calling the police. You sound absurd and only serve to perpetuate the myth that black people don't snitch.
OMG we just destroyed you but you won't let it go. The only person making assumptions is you. Further, why are you bringing race into this discussion? The topic is Suge and a crime against one of his family members (tragically, a child). Logically, one wonders as to the level of cooperation with the police investigation by THIS family.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm the "Good" poster, and this is my only other post on this thread since then.
My knee-jerk reaction was along the lines of "what goes around comes around," but it wasn't a kind thing to say and I regret it.
Jeff posting the location from where you posted that comment had you peeing in your seat. I would have loved to have been your cube mate when you read Jeff's post. I'm sure all of the blood drained out of your body and you imagined a scenario where everyone with whom you work knew your true feeling about a 14 year old who's only known misstep was to have a father who is a feckless criminal. I hope you were sufficiently spooked and now realize that ANYTHING posted on the "internets" is fair game.
While you may have publicly stated that you regret the comment, I believe you only posted that because Jeff semi-outed you; not that I agree with Jeff's actions but it was a nice treat.![]()
You are probably reading too much into this. I prefer to take her at her word and accept that she made a hasty post that she later regretted. She at least stepped and admitted the error. I'll give her credit for that.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm the "Good" poster, and this is my only other post on this thread since then.
My knee-jerk reaction was along the lines of "what goes around comes around," but it wasn't a kind thing to say and I regret it.
Jeff posting the location from where you posted that comment had you peeing in your seat. I would have loved to have been your cube mate when you read Jeff's post. I'm sure all of the blood drained out of your body and you imagined a scenario where everyone with whom you work knew your true feeling about a 14 year old who's only known misstep was to have a father who is a feckless criminal. I hope you were sufficiently spooked and now realize that ANYTHING posted on the "internets" is fair game.
While you may have publicly stated that you regret the comment, I believe you only posted that because Jeff semi-outed you; not that I agree with Jeff's actions but it was a nice treat.![]()
You are probably reading too much into this. I prefer to take her at her word and accept that she made a hasty post that she later regretted. She at least stepped and admitted the error. I'll give her credit for that.