Anonymous wrote:Chicago's awesome -- great food, live music, interesting theater, Art Institute, nice parks, independent bookstores, decent transit. I spent a couple of years there during grad school and loved it.
The challenge at U of C will be to get out of Hyde Park and see other parts of the city. It's almost like Berkeley to SF which is more of a schlep than Cambridge to Boston.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I loved Chicago. But the school is rather Jewish.
Most of the top schools are, pal. So what?
Anonymous wrote:I loved Chicago. But the school is rather Jewish.
Anonymous wrote:Hi, it's OP again. I thought I might as well update since this thread was very useful. My son will be attending UChicago this coming fall!
Thanks for the advice everyone, it was spot on. He absolutely loved the school, the other admitted students, and Hyde Park when he visited. He sat in on some classes, including a CS and history class, and in both he went up to the professors after and they were both very interested in chatting with a random high schooler about their subjects. The CS one even telling him to come back to get a job doing computational linguistics.
Mudd ended up being too constraining - you had to take required humanities classes at Mudd, and it wasn't as easy to cross register as he was expecting. When he talked to students they weren't interested in anything outside of math/science/CS, while at Chicago everyone seemed to be interested in everything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:U. of Chicago is the home of the "Chicago School" of economics. This is a school of thought most famously promulgated by Milton Friedman, who espoused a purely lassez-faire approach to economic policy that approached social darwinism, and has been a favorite touchstone of oligarchs everywhere.
The dictatorship of the bloody-handed murderer Augusto Pinochet in Chile explicitly looked to the Chicago School for its economic policies, regardless of the human and social costs that followed.
Yes, and the Chicago School has also heavily influenced U.S. economic and legal thinking. See, for example, current Supreme Court.
I'm a liberal economist without any affiliation to U Chicago. You sound nuts when you write things like, "Milton Friedman... make that the entire U Chicago ... have single-handedly ruined our economy ... and our judicial system! It's a conspiracy!"
Please stop urging OP to deny her son a fine education at U Chicago, just because some Chilean students in the 1970s attended grad school there. Newsflash: the University of Chicago is more than just a single graduate school in economics. Yes, the economics department there is conservative. But there are plenty of other schools there. They are really pushing the arts these days, for example. OP's kid can get the great education in humanities and CS he wants there, without having to interact with the Econ department for a single second.
Just want to add that you shouldn't avoid economics classes there because it has, like, the top econ program in the entire country. Why would anyone be embarrassed by this?