Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Obama put a stop to my donations.
Me too since he has been president. Given his history of lack of charitable donations before he ran for president, he is someone who thinks to take other people's money to help the poor but not his. He only started donating 15-20-ish percent since 2008. I find that hypocritical and disgusting which is why I can't stand to even look at the guy on t.v.
When then-presidential candidate Obama released his tax returns during the 2008 campaign, it was revealed that he began making significant gifts to charity after he started making serious money from his books — and after he decided to run for president.
Here’s what the numbers look like:
2005: $77,315 to charity out of income of $1.66 million (4.6 percent)
2004: $2,500 out of $207,647 (1.2 percent)
2003: $3,400 out of $238,327 (1.4 percent)
2002: $1,050 out of $259,394 (0.4 percent)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$200,000....about $125 to various organizations and clothing/furniture to Salvation Army. I'm in a helping profession so I do give back in other ways
And do you write off this generous effort? What a joke.
Actually I do write it off. I spend 40 hours a week in a helping profession in a marginally paid position for my level of education so while I'm not giving much financially, I am being charitable in other ways.
Anonymous wrote:It is not an opinion. Conservatives give much much more to charity. Probably bc they go to church more.
Anonymous wrote:liberals give much less, hardly anything.
Anonymous wrote:liberals give much less, hardly anything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$200,000....about $125 to various organizations and clothing/furniture to Salvation Army. I'm in a helping profession so I do give back in other ways
And do you write off this generous effort? What a joke.
Actually I do write it off. I spend 40 hours a week in a helping profession in a marginally paid position for my level of education so while I'm not giving much financially, I am being charitable in other ways.
Love. More people should really actually "do" instead of "donate."
Because 200k is marginally paid? Please, education does not and should never equate to an expected salary. I hear this all the time with govy lawyers that make 6 figures.
I'm the pp who called the contribution a joke. I too work in the public sector making less than I could in the private, but I donate a ton more than you. You don't seem very charitable in your attitude.
Anonymous wrote:I apologize for being clueless, but I thought members of a church had to tithe 10% of income? Or is it voluntary?
Anonymous wrote:Wow. This thread is a real eye-opener.
So many people with so much money that are so unwilling to help others with charitable giving - and seem to be so resentful that anyone would even suggest that they could maybe give a little bit more.
I'm at $160K HHI, $3K donations - which I've often though was too low. But apparently I'm quite generous with my giving compared to many DCUMers. And yes, I have kids, and medical costs, and housing costs, and, like everyone else, need to save for retirement and college.
The people who quit giving because "Obummer"? Are you the same people who say we should cut government and let private charities fill the gap?
The more I think about it, the more sick reading this thread makes me feel. There's thousands of hungry children in the DC area. Would it kill any of you high-income earners to make a donation to your local food bank?