Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The idea of assigning to a lottery the outcomes of the most important investment decisions a family has to make in a lifetime, if so unreasonably wrong and unfounded, from a social and economic point of view, that the only rationale that one can find is fulfilling lobbying from the incredibly powerful private schools (the schools + their alumni).
The fact is that for the vast majority of the city, the most important investment decision a family has to make in a lifetime IS assigned via lottery outcome. If you live in-boundary for a good school WOTP, you are by far in the minority.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The idea of assigning to a lottery the outcomes of the most important investment decisions a family has to make in a lifetime, if so unreasonably wrong and unfounded, from a social and economic point of view, that the only rationale that one can find is fulfilling lobbying from the incredibly powerful private schools (the schools + their alumni).
The fact is that for the vast majority of the city, the most important investment decision a family has to make in a lifetime IS assigned via lottery outcome. If you live in-boundary for a good school WOTP, you are by far in the minority.
Anonymous wrote:The idea of assigning to a lottery the outcomes of the most important investment decisions a family has to make in a lifetime, if so unreasonably wrong and unfounded, from a social and economic point of view, that the only rationale that one can find is fulfilling lobbying from the incredibly powerful private schools (the schools + their alumni).
Anonymous wrote:I doubt many people will leave if they implement DC-wide HS. I am surprised all these parents who tell me how great Janney, Lafayette, Murch, etc. have such little faith in DCPS as a whole.
Anonymous wrote:The idea of assigning to a lottery the outcomes of the most important investment decisions a family has to make in a lifetime, if so unreasonably wrong and unfounded, from a social and economic point of view, that the only rationale that one can find is fulfilling lobbying from the incredibly powerful private schools (the schools + their alumni).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sidwell and NCS and St.Albans can draw from the pool of best kids in DC and around because they thrive on the inability of the city to give families a clear and predictable path for their kids public school options.
+2
You all seem to think most people choose these elite private schools because of the state of the public school. I don't think that is at all accurate. If it were, you wouldn't get so many MoCo and NOVA students at the top privates. Nor would you have so many rich families living in NWDC. Most families who choose private school do so because they prefer private school.
This is somewhat true. My spouse is against sending the kids public. But I would have put up a bigger fight if it wasn't DCPS. I believe strongly in public education but the incompetence of DCPS central office makes me suspicious of it all. I do think it is criminal that half of city has acceptable schools and the other half doesn't. It also disturbs me that the haves don't give a crap about the have nots. I want everyone to have a good public school option.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sidwell and NCS and St.Albans can draw from the pool of best kids in DC and around because they thrive on the inability of the city to give families a clear and predictable path for their kids public school options.
+2
You all seem to think most people choose these elite private schools because of the state of the public school. I don't think that is at all accurate. If it were, you wouldn't get so many MoCo and NOVA students at the top privates. Nor would you have so many rich families living in NWDC. Most families who choose private school do so because they prefer private school.
This is somewhat true. My spouse is against sending the kids public. But I would have put up a bigger fight if it wasn't DCPS. I believe strongly in public education but the incompetence of DCPS central office makes me suspicious of it all. I do think it is criminal that half of city has acceptable schools and the other half doesn't. It also disturbs me that the haves don't give a crap about the have nots. I want everyone to have a good public school option.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sidwell and NCS and St.Albans can draw from the pool of best kids in DC and around because they thrive on the inability of the city to give families a clear and predictable path for their kids public school options.
+2
You all seem to think most people choose these elite private schools because of the state of the public school. I don't think that is at all accurate. If it were, you wouldn't get so many MoCo and NOVA students at the top privates. Nor would you have so many rich families living in NWDC. Most families who choose private school do so because they prefer private school.
Anonymous wrote:Sidwell and NCS and St.Albans can draw from the pool of best kids in DC and around because they thrive on the inability of the city to give families a clear and predictable path for their kids public school options.
+2
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is beyond ridiculous that you all think the private schools in DC want or actually NEED your public school kids. Please. Do you really not get how many applicants are turned away from the privates every year. It is not just the top tier of privates either. Most of them turn applicants away due to limited spaces. You folks are delusional if you think there is some private school lobby pushing the DC council to do anything at all. They dont give a rats ass. They don't need to.
No, I don't, and evidently you dont get it either. Sidwell and NCS and St.Albans can draw from the pool of best kids in DC and around because they thrive on the inability of the city to give families a clear and predictable path for their kids public school options. Beyond them, there is a bunch of private schools who pretty much take in whoever applies, and in fact will never tell you how many applications they get. Why? Because if they did, even you would realize they do care about the whole process.
Ask St.Ann's Academy the rats ass they give about the improving public schools. But hurry up. They are closing in June after 90 years because of lack of enrolment,
Anonymous wrote:It is beyond ridiculous that you all think the private schools in DC want or actually NEED your public school kids. Please. Do you really not get how many applicants are turned away from the privates every year. It is not just the top tier of privates either. Most of them turn applicants away due to limited spaces. You folks are delusional if you think there is some private school lobby pushing the DC council to do anything at all. They dont give a rats ass. They don't need to.
Anonymous wrote:the parents can certainly argue that the loss of neighborhood rights is an unnecessary burden, and infringes on their ability to control their kids. There is no court-ordered reason to shuffle students around, no desegregation order in place. Wilson and Deal are overcrowded simply because of DC government-initiated policies, instituted in the past 7 yrs or so. I think there is definitely be a judge who will listen to the caseAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am just waiting to hear the proposal in April, then I will take action starting from from my school to beyond - Mann elementary - for a joint t
Lawsuit if they abolish IB feeding to Wilson.
The city doesn't owe people the right to feed to a particular high school in perpetuity just because they bought a place with that expectation. In VA, they redraw boundaries all of the time. It's a contentious process, but homeowners don't get to sue. No judge will entertain such a lawsuit.
Now, if some people in the city get to feed to a particular school based on their expensive address , while others get uncertainty, it would be pretty easy for the parents in the controlled choice area to sue claiming unequal treatment under the law.
I do agree that handing people that uncertainty could result in movement to the suburbs. It's so odd that these changes would be contemplated with no reference to San Francisco or Boston. SF has the lowest percentage of families with school aged children of any city in the country.
Anonymous wrote:It is beyond ridiculous that you all think the private schools in DC want or actually NEED your public school kids. Please. Do you really not get how many applicants are turned away from the privates every year. It is not just the top tier of privates either. Most of them turn applicants away due to limited spaces. You folks are delusional if you think there is some private school lobby pushing the DC council to do anything at all. They dont give a rats ass. They don't need to.