Anonymous wrote:I agree that it is understandable that the OP is curious about the donor. Even though the donor's FB page is not fully privacy-protected, I doubt she would welcome a peeker who was just interested because she was her donor, just as I doubt anyone would be pleased that their ex is peeking.
Anonymity in these circumstances is to protect everyone - donor, OP, OP's child, donor's child. Would it be OK if the positions were reversed? If the donor had accidentally found out OP's name and was now following her on FB to see how OP's child was doing? Understandable curiosity, yes. But how would OP like it? The OP agreed to anonymity and now she is betraying her promise.
Anonymous wrote:I agree that it is understandable that the OP is curious about the donor. Even though the donor's FB page is not fully privacy-protected, I doubt she would welcome a peeker who was just interested because she was her donor, just as I doubt anyone would be pleased that their ex is peeking.
Anonymity in these circumstances is to protect everyone - donor, OP, OP's child, donor's child. Would it be OK if the positions were reversed? If the donor had accidentally found out OP's name and was now following her on FB to see how OP's child was doing? Understandable curiosity, yes. But how would OP like it? The OP agreed to anonymity and now she is betraying her promise.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here, and no this is not a troll post. But I am sitting here laughing at all the judgemental BS some of you are spewing. I was reaching out for some helpful feedback, but my mistake was thinking some of you DCUMs would have an EQ high enough to provide that.
For those of you who who manage to respond without taking your bad day out on me, I really appreciate it. I'm not some crazy woman, just someone who happens to let her curiosity get the best of her. I know plenty of people via forums who did an open egg donation (they know their donors), so I don't consider what I'm doing some heinous crime. The fact is she's a lovely young lady who is smart, gorgeous, and by her FB posts - very sweet. If anything, I'm extremely proud of her.
If you feel like you can't stop looking (your curiosity was sated, great) please get help from a professional to talk through your obsessions.
Oh, you judgmental bitches. Obsessions, really? You guys are right, she didn't do an open donation, so this is not what she should be doing, but the fact is, the anonymity was meant to protect HER as much as the donor. Just because she now finds it hard to look away does not mean that she has anything pathological going on. She'll get over it, probably without professional help.
Thank you, pp. For the record, I'm going to make a clean break. But seriously people, get a grip. Being anonymous online doesn't mean you use it as some outlet for your neuroses - lash out much? If this is how some of you act to every question put to you, then you definitely have bigger problems than I do. Jeez.
Anonymous wrote:OP here, and no this is not a troll post. But I am sitting here laughing at all the judgemental BS some of you are spewing. I was reaching out for some helpful feedback, but my mistake was thinking some of you DCUMs would have an EQ high enough to provide that.
For those of you who who manage to respond without taking your bad day out on me, I really appreciate it. I'm not some crazy woman, just someone who happens to let her curiosity get the best of her. I know plenty of people via forums who did an open egg donation (they know their donors), so I don't consider what I'm doing some heinous crime. The fact is she's a lovely young lady who is smart, gorgeous, and by her FB posts - very sweet. If anything, I'm extremely proud of her.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This reads like some creepy sci-fi story come true. Creative writing class OP?
The only sci-fi part about this is using an egg donor.
My point exactly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This reads like some creepy sci-fi story come true. Creative writing class OP?
The only sci-fi part about this is using an egg donor.
Anonymous wrote:This reads like some creepy sci-fi story come true. Creative writing class OP?
Anonymous wrote:Not that Urban Dictionary is Websters (it's not, so take their definition with a grain of salt):
Facebook Stalking, like regular stalking, allows the stalker to secretly gather information about the person they are interested in; the stalkee if you will. Unlike regular stalking, Facebook Stalking is less likely to have an illegal component and is generally accepted by it's voyeuristic victims. The argument being, that if you didn't want others to know about your life, you wouldn't post it all over the internet.
So the whole point of using their definition is moot to the pp who thought is was so awful.
Anonymous wrote:http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=facebook%20stalking