Anonymous wrote:[.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
...
+100. It puts parents in a very difficult position when FCPS gives some indication that prepping isn't okay, but does nothing to principals or other school personnel who mention the a availability of prep materials to student at their schools and also allow the scores regardless of prepping. Do you not prep your child knowing you are putting them at a disadvantage to those who prep or do you prep and give your child and advantage over those who haven't. Not a good position to put parents in. Also, if FCPS is going to ask about prepping, they need to do it in every classroom at all schools.
This is what I disagree with: the notion that not prepping puts the kids at a disadvantage. The only place where prepping for the CogAT/FxAT matters in in AAP admissions. First, there is little evidence that AAP is significantly better than general education. In fact, in some places, larger class size might make the education worse. Second, there is no evidence that test prep helps AAP admissions. Near as I can tell, for scores near the in pool cutoff from the old CogAT (120-140), kids get in mostly based on the GBRS. If CogAT was really important, my DD would not be in AAP.
Prep if you want. But I think 1) you should be honest about it (tell the school), and 2) there are probably better use of the time.
If you don't think AAP is any better than gen ed, then why do you care if people prep? If people are dumb enough to waste time and money on something that gets them nothing and disadvantages no one, then no biggies, prep, don't prep, everyone gets the same anyway. And why would Fairfax County want useless info about prepping when it doesn't really affect anyone anyway? Wouldn't spending time giving useless information be a waste of valuable time? There must be some better use for that time. There also must be better use of your time than telling people to report themselves for engaging in entirely benign activities that disadvantage no one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
...
+100. It puts parents in a very difficult position when FCPS gives some indication that prepping isn't okay, but does nothing to principals or other school personnel who mention the a availability of prep materials to student at their schools and also allow the scores regardless of prepping. Do you not prep your child knowing you are putting them at a disadvantage to those who prep or do you prep and give your child and advantage over those who haven't. Not a good position to put parents in. Also, if FCPS is going to ask about prepping, they need to do it in every classroom at all schools.
This is what I disagree with: the notion that not prepping puts the kids at a disadvantage. The only place where prepping for the CogAT/FxAT matters in in AAP admissions. First, there is little evidence that AAP is significantly better than general education. In fact, in some places, larger class size might make the education worse. Second, there is no evidence that test prep helps AAP admissions. Near as I can tell, for scores near the in pool cutoff from the old CogAT (120-140), kids get in mostly based on the GBRS. If CogAT was really important, my DD would not be in AAP.
Prep if you want. But I think 1) you should be honest about it (tell the school), and 2) there are probably better use of the time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm not sure I fully subscribe to this American notion that you should get into this program (or not) based solely on your "natural" gifts.
No one is suggesting you should have to agree with this American notion, but since Fairfax County is in the United States of America, would you agree that it is not all that odd that the standards by which the schools are run should be based on American ideas? Not saying that American ideas are better than any other culture's ideas, but isn't it reasonable that any country's schools be run based on that country's ideas?
If I were living in England or France, it would not surprise me at all that their schools were being run according to English or French ideas, and while I might not agree with everything, if I were sending my children to their schools, I wouldn't expect them to do things differently because I disagreed. It seems to be that it is standard procedure (and generally good manners) to abide by the customs of the place where you are.
This is an ironic response because you clearly assumed I'm a foreigner-- which I'm not. My grandparents are all American-born children of Irish/German descent.
Anonymous wrote:
...
+100. It puts parents in a very difficult position when FCPS gives some indication that prepping isn't okay, but does nothing to principals or other school personnel who mention the a availability of prep materials to student at their schools and also allow the scores regardless of prepping. Do you not prep your child knowing you are putting them at a disadvantage to those who prep or do you prep and give your child and advantage over those who haven't. Not a good position to put parents in. Also, if FCPS is going to ask about prepping, they need to do it in every classroom at all schools.
Anonymous wrote:I'm not sure I fully subscribe to this American notion that you should get into this program (or not) based solely on your "natural" gifts.
No one is suggesting you should have to agree with this American notion, but since Fairfax County is in the United States of America, would you agree that it is not all that odd that the standards by which the schools are run should be based on American ideas? Not saying that American ideas are better than any other culture's ideas, but isn't it reasonable that any country's schools be run based on that country's ideas?
If I were living in England or France, it would not surprise me at all that their schools were being run according to English or French ideas, and while I might not agree with everything, if I were sending my children to their schools, I wouldn't expect them to do things differently because I disagreed. It seems to be that it is standard procedure (and generally good manners) to abide by the customs of the place where you are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Yes, why is it that people don't like the school to know that they're prepping or get nervous when they think the school is asking kids if they'd been prepping? Why would that be?
LOL!! +1
Anonymous wrote:I'm not sure I fully subscribe to this American notion that you should get into this program (or not) based solely on your "natural" gifts.
No one is suggesting you should have to agree with this American notion, but since Fairfax County is in the United States of America, would you agree that it is not all that odd that the standards by which the schools are run should be based on American ideas? Not saying that American ideas are better than any other culture's ideas, but isn't it reasonable that any country's schools be run based on that country's ideas?
If I were living in England or France, it would not surprise me at all that their schools were being run according to English or French ideas, and while I might not agree with everything, if I were sending my children to their schools, I wouldn't expect them to do things differently because I disagreed. It seems to be that it is standard procedure (and generally good manners) to abide by the customs of the place where you are.

I'm not sure I fully subscribe to this American notion that you should get into this program (or not) based solely on your "natural" gifts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Yes, why is it that people don't like the school to know that they're prepping or get nervous when they think the school is asking kids if they'd been prepping? Why would that be?
LOL!! +1
Anonymous wrote:
Yes, why is it that people don't like the school to know that they're prepping or get nervous when they think the school is asking kids if they'd been prepping? Why would that be?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:....
Definitely true at our center. So many kids have been "bumped up" to AAP over the past year (due to parent appeals), that the GE classes have dwindled significantly. It's really becoming ridiculous that AAP kids now far outnumber GE in our 4th grade. Anyone who appeals can get their child in, making AAP pretty much meaningless for the kids who are at the highest end of the spectrum, and making GE very unappealing for the others. Several kids at our school have left for privates, rather than get stuck in GE where up to a third of the class are special needs. I thought GE was where the majority of kids were supposed to be educated. Something is very skewed with the current system.
Who told you that anyone who appeals can get their kids in? I know many parents (especially this year) who did not manage to "get their kids in" on appeal. In my DS's school (Center), the appeals round generated only a handful of new entries (single-digit), and those few who made it in on appeal had fantastic WISC scores. The ones who had just good WISC scores, stayed at GE. Actually, the AAPRT herself told us that the kids who get in on appeal usually do better at AAP than the ones who get in during the first round, because the appeals kids are doubled-screened (NNAT/CogAT plus WISC). Without a great WISC score no one makes it on appeal. So, it's not the appeals that overcrowd the AAP classes, it's the helicopter parents who work the teachers to get their kids high GBRSs and usually make it in the first round. For the record, DS made it in the first round with good scores and decent GBRS, but his best friend, a highly talented boy with high scores but low GBRS, had to submit a stellar WISC to get in. According to DS, his friend's now doing much better than anyone else in his class...
I'm wondering how you know so much about the scores of the other children, who appealed, who didn't get in, etc.?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I seriously doubt the validity of this test. You are actually thinking that asking a 7 or 8 year old if they have seen questions like these outside of school is being noted as some gospel of truth to be used to sway a GBRS or other mark in the kid's file as to his/her ability? A kid has no idea if he/she has been prepped or not unless the parent says you're being prepped. My own kids have admitted to things they didn't do and they did do because they are kids! (Once mine said she put the fridge on the coldest setting when I angrily asked who did it - she was in the middle of her time out when my husband comes downstairs and says it was him. She was SEVEN.
I meant validity of the post.
+1 that the kids' reporting may not be accurate. The kids may not have known that they were being asked about something perceived as negative by the school and may have thought they would get brownie points for saying they had seen questions like that before. They may have thought it was a casual question, like if they were starting a unit on Siberian tigers and the teacher asked, "How many of you have seen a Siberian tiger before?" Hands might shoot up -- "I have! I have!" -- even if it wasn't quite accurate.
I doubt that the assistant principal was planning any particular action, even if the question was asked as stated. Maybe the AP just wanted to get a general sense of how much prepping may have gone on, out of curiosity. I don't think that kids could be penalized for doing something that their parents asked them to do, and there would be no way for the AP to prove what children's scores would have been without the prepping.
Finally someone is making sense here....... Not sure why people are so paranoid as if they committed a big crime.
Yes, why is it that people don't like the school to know that they're prepping or get nervous when they think the school is asking kids if they'd been prepping? Why would that be?
Anonymous wrote:....
Definitely true at our center. So many kids have been "bumped up" to AAP over the past year (due to parent appeals), that the GE classes have dwindled significantly. It's really becoming ridiculous that AAP kids now far outnumber GE in our 4th grade. Anyone who appeals can get their child in, making AAP pretty much meaningless for the kids who are at the highest end of the spectrum, and making GE very unappealing for the others. Several kids at our school have left for privates, rather than get stuck in GE where up to a third of the class are special needs. I thought GE was where the majority of kids were supposed to be educated. Something is very skewed with the current system.
Who told you that anyone who appeals can get their kids in? I know many parents (especially this year) who did not manage to "get their kids in" on appeal. In my DS's school (Center), the appeals round generated only a handful of new entries (single-digit), and those few who made it in on appeal had fantastic WISC scores. The ones who had just good WISC scores, stayed at GE. Actually, the AAPRT herself told us that the kids who get in on appeal usually do better at AAP than the ones who get in during the first round, because the appeals kids are doubled-screened (NNAT/CogAT plus WISC). Without a great WISC score no one makes it on appeal. So, it's not the appeals that overcrowd the AAP classes, it's the helicopter parents who work the teachers to get their kids high GBRSs and usually make it in the first round. For the record, DS made it in the first round with good scores and decent GBRS, but his best friend, a highly talented boy with high scores but low GBRS, had to submit a stellar WISC to get in. According to DS, his friend's now doing much better than anyone else in his class...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I seriously doubt the validity of this test. You are actually thinking that asking a 7 or 8 year old if they have seen questions like these outside of school is being noted as some gospel of truth to be used to sway a GBRS or other mark in the kid's file as to his/her ability? A kid has no idea if he/she has been prepped or not unless the parent says you're being prepped. My own kids have admitted to things they didn't do and they did do because they are kids! (Once mine said she put the fridge on the coldest setting when I angrily asked who did it - she was in the middle of her time out when my husband comes downstairs and says it was him. She was SEVEN.
I meant validity of the post.
+1 that the kids' reporting may not be accurate. The kids may not have known that they were being asked about something perceived as negative by the school and may have thought they would get brownie points for saying they had seen questions like that before. They may have thought it was a casual question, like if they were starting a unit on Siberian tigers and the teacher asked, "How many of you have seen a Siberian tiger before?" Hands might shoot up -- "I have! I have!" -- even if it wasn't quite accurate.
I doubt that the assistant principal was planning any particular action, even if the question was asked as stated. Maybe the AP just wanted to get a general sense of how much prepping may have gone on, out of curiosity. I don't think that kids could be penalized for doing something that their parents asked them to do, and there would be no way for the AP to prove what children's scores would have been without the prepping.
Finally someone is making sense here....... Not sure why people are so paranoid as if they committed a big crime.