Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you actually saying that someone who contemplates suicide and reaches out for help, but then changes his or her mind and does not do it is "abusive"?
That is a remarkable proposition.
No, but I'm not surprised you would take it that way, given your other comments.
Here is what was stated: For those that follow up on their threats, that's unfortunate to use your own wording. For those that don't, that's abuse
How should I interpret that? For those that kill themselves: Unfortunate
For those that don't: That's abuse.
Apparently I cannot read. Help me.
I mistyped. Where you and I aren't connecting is that you assume every threat, every word about suicide coming from someone's mouth is from a true sense of pain. When that's the case, I think everyone agrees with you that it's awful. But that's not the case, and you're naive if you think every time someone threatens suicide it's an honest threat. There are many times that it's used as a tool to manipulate, and that's what people are saying. For many people, they are left wondering if it's a credible threat or not, and they are manipulated into changing their behavior or staying with someone out of fear, when in reality that person was never going to commit suicide, they just knew the threat would be enough to get what they want.
Really? Your proposition is that lots of people not at all suicidal threaten suicide in order to get someone to stay with them?
Seems to me if the goal is one of blackmail, there are many more effective ways to go about it. Threaten to expose a secret (many are told in intimate relationships).
Pretending to be suicidal. I've never heard of that one before, let alone the idea that it is employed by many. And what is your evidence that people who are not experiencing suicidal ideation threaten it to get what they want, other than that some of them remain alive??
Which is why it is obvious you don't work in the domestic violence field. Open your mind up perhaps and realize yours is not the only position or opinion that are valid, and that your facts are one of many to be true.
You'll have to make allowances for me. No I don't work in the domestic violence field. I am not a chef, either. And, while I have been to the dark place many times, it has never occurred to me to "pretend" suicide. I cannot get my mind around the concept. If I wanted to manipulate some, or get revenge on someone, I could think of a variety of things I might do. "Playing" suicide is not one of them.
And, while I am not directing this at you specifically, the amount of disdain, contempt and pure hatred expressed on this thread towards those who were in so much pain that they killed themselves is really shocking to me. If I feel suicidal again, I guess I won't talk to anyone about it. Lest they think I am trying to threaten them or manipulate them or otherwise be a nasty human being with no love for anyone but myself. I certainly wouldn't want to have to deal with those feelings in addition to everything else.
This has been a real education.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you actually saying that someone who contemplates suicide and reaches out for help, but then changes his or her mind and does not do it is "abusive"?
That is a remarkable proposition.
No, but I'm not surprised you would take it that way, given your other comments.
Here is what was stated: For those that follow up on their threats, that's unfortunate to use your own wording. For those that don't, that's abuse
How should I interpret that? For those that kill themselves: Unfortunate
For those that don't: That's abuse.
Apparently I cannot read. Help me.
I mistyped. Where you and I aren't connecting is that you assume every threat, every word about suicide coming from someone's mouth is from a true sense of pain. When that's the case, I think everyone agrees with you that it's awful. But that's not the case, and you're naive if you think every time someone threatens suicide it's an honest threat. There are many times that it's used as a tool to manipulate, and that's what people are saying. For many people, they are left wondering if it's a credible threat or not, and they are manipulated into changing their behavior or staying with someone out of fear, when in reality that person was never going to commit suicide, they just knew the threat would be enough to get what they want.
Really? Your proposition is that lots of people not at all suicidal threaten suicide in order to get someone to stay with them?
Seems to me if the goal is one of blackmail, there are many more effective ways to go about it. Threaten to expose a secret (many are told in intimate relationships).
Pretending to be suicidal. I've never heard of that one before, let alone the idea that it is employed by many. And what is your evidence that people who are not experiencing suicidal ideation threaten it to get what they want, other than that some of them remain alive??
Which is why it is obvious you don't work in the domestic violence field. Open your mind up perhaps and realize yours is not the only position or opinion that are valid, and that your facts are one of many to be true.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are disgusting. If you knew anything about what happens when a parent commits suicide, you would know that what is most damaging to the child is living without the parent, and knowing that the parent committed suicide. This increases the chances of the child committing suicide, as they feel as though their parent has sort of made it "acceptable". Yet, when you advocate that suicidal people who cry for help are making "threats" and are "selfish" and should be served with restraining orders, you take away the only thing left that can keep them alive, which is the support of others. They have exhausted every tool in their belt. And you want them to just suck it up. That is a recipe for suicide. Your ignorance, your callousness, your righteous judgment against people in unimaginable pain just contributes to more pain.
For whatever its worth, I actually agree with a fair amount of what you are saying (or trying to say), but your moral indignation, name calling, and poor word choice makes me extremely reluctant to wade in on your side of this.
Totally agree. If the above PP is the same ranting one from upthread, and the same person who calls a child encountering a dead parent "unfortunate," their credibility is shot.
You can call it whatever you want PP. A threat is just a threat - it's either followed through on or not. For those that follow up on their threats, that's unfortunate to use your own wording. For those that don't, that's abuse. The problem is that no one knows, do they? Not knowing what the outcome is doesn't make it NOT a threat. It's still a threat.
And yes, it's selfish to commit suicide. No one is advocating that suicidal people just suck it up. You're twisting words because you're so worked up. No one said, "I think it's best if they don't get help, that they wallow in their pain and just end it all." What some people have said is that it's really horribly traumatizing to find someone who has committed suicide or to be collateral damage in their pain. Why is that so hard for you to understand?
Since you seem to like to post articles, what about this one?
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2009-11-15/news/0911140551_1_suicide-water-fight-man
I take something very different from that article. I was touched by the couple the man assisted just before he killed himself, who questioned whether they should have talked to him instead of just thanking him. And the friend who wished he had been contacted.
Yes, watching someone fall to their death is unpleasant. Hating your life so much that you jump is much more so. This expectation that the suicidal should be very polite in cleaning up after themselves is astounding. There are only so many ways to do it. The "neatest" one would be pills, but it rarely works. I suppose the second "neatest" would be carbon monoxide poisoning. But the resentment people on this thread have voiced against those who leave a mess behind after killing themselves is just incredible.
How many people witnessed people from the World Trade Center jump to the deaths? Should they be angry that they had to see that? I'm sure it was traumatizing for them. Perhaps those in the World Trade Center should have forced themselves to withstand the unbearable heat in order to spare those below having to see them fall. View the trajectory.
a) red herring argument;
b) find a person who witnessed these people falling and ask them if it was "unpleasant."
I guess a red herring argument is one for which you do not have a response. Those that jumped from the World Trade Center did so because they were so hot, and so afraid, that jumping to their deaths seemed better than having to endure another moment of it. Those were suicides. Messy ones. But you don't call them names.
Those that jump to their deaths always do so because they are in so much pain that jumping off a bridge or shooting themselves seems like a better alternative. The pain may be emotional, but it's just as intense.
Sorry about the mess.
So people who commit suicide do so because they're hot? Really?
That's why it's a red herring.
You're not very bright are you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:His wife left him because he got angry with her and hit the daughter hard enough to make her mouth start bleeding...just to get back at his wife. He was cruel. Is being an abusive monster is a mental illness?
I didn't say mentally ill people can't also be assholes. This guy did not kill himself to piss off his wife. And if he did, that would itself be extremely compelling evidence he was mentally ill.
Actually, suicide is often used as a punishment by abusers. They get off on making the thought that their spouse will suffer and be judged harshly as a result of their suicide. Sylvia Plath was punishing her husband with her death.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are disgusting. If you knew anything about what happens when a parent commits suicide, you would know that what is most damaging to the child is living without the parent, and knowing that the parent committed suicide. This increases the chances of the child committing suicide, as they feel as though their parent has sort of made it "acceptable". Yet, when you advocate that suicidal people who cry for help are making "threats" and are "selfish" and should be served with restraining orders, you take away the only thing left that can keep them alive, which is the support of others. They have exhausted every tool in their belt. And you want them to just suck it up. That is a recipe for suicide. Your ignorance, your callousness, your righteous judgment against people in unimaginable pain just contributes to more pain.
For whatever its worth, I actually agree with a fair amount of what you are saying (or trying to say), but your moral indignation, name calling, and poor word choice makes me extremely reluctant to wade in on your side of this.
Totally agree. If the above PP is the same ranting one from upthread, and the same person who calls a child encountering a dead parent "unfortunate," their credibility is shot.
You can call it whatever you want PP. A threat is just a threat - it's either followed through on or not. For those that follow up on their threats, that's unfortunate to use your own wording. For those that don't, that's abuse. The problem is that no one knows, do they? Not knowing what the outcome is doesn't make it NOT a threat. It's still a threat.
And yes, it's selfish to commit suicide. No one is advocating that suicidal people just suck it up. You're twisting words because you're so worked up. No one said, "I think it's best if they don't get help, that they wallow in their pain and just end it all." What some people have said is that it's really horribly traumatizing to find someone who has committed suicide or to be collateral damage in their pain. Why is that so hard for you to understand?
Since you seem to like to post articles, what about this one?
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2009-11-15/news/0911140551_1_suicide-water-fight-man
I take something very different from that article. I was touched by the couple the man assisted just before he killed himself, who questioned whether they should have talked to him instead of just thanking him. And the friend who wished he had been contacted.
Yes, watching someone fall to their death is unpleasant. Hating your life so much that you jump is much more so. This expectation that the suicidal should be very polite in cleaning up after themselves is astounding. There are only so many ways to do it. The "neatest" one would be pills, but it rarely works. I suppose the second "neatest" would be carbon monoxide poisoning. But the resentment people on this thread have voiced against those who leave a mess behind after killing themselves is just incredible.
How many people witnessed people from the World Trade Center jump to the deaths? Should they be angry that they had to see that? I'm sure it was traumatizing for them. Perhaps those in the World Trade Center should have forced themselves to withstand the unbearable heat in order to spare those below having to see them fall. View the trajectory.
a) red herring argument;
b) find a person who witnessed these people falling and ask them if it was "unpleasant."
I guess a red herring argument is one for which you do not have a response. Those that jumped from the World Trade Center did so because they were so hot, and so afraid, that jumping to their deaths seemed better than having to endure another moment of it. Those were suicides. Messy ones. But you don't call them names.
Those that jump to their deaths always do so because they are in so much pain that jumping off a bridge or shooting themselves seems like a better alternative. The pain may be emotional, but it's just as intense.
Sorry about the mess.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you actually saying that someone who contemplates suicide and reaches out for help, but then changes his or her mind and does not do it is "abusive"?
That is a remarkable proposition.
No, but I'm not surprised you would take it that way, given your other comments.
Here is what was stated: For those that follow up on their threats, that's unfortunate to use your own wording. For those that don't, that's abuse
How should I interpret that? For those that kill themselves: Unfortunate
For those that don't: That's abuse.
Apparently I cannot read. Help me.
I mistyped. Where you and I aren't connecting is that you assume every threat, every word about suicide coming from someone's mouth is from a true sense of pain. When that's the case, I think everyone agrees with you that it's awful. But that's not the case, and you're naive if you think every time someone threatens suicide it's an honest threat. There are many times that it's used as a tool to manipulate, and that's what people are saying. For many people, they are left wondering if it's a credible threat or not, and they are manipulated into changing their behavior or staying with someone out of fear, when in reality that person was never going to commit suicide, they just knew the threat would be enough to get what they want.
Really? Your proposition is that lots of people not at all suicidal threaten suicide in order to get someone to stay with them?
Seems to me if the goal is one of blackmail, there are many more effective ways to go about it. Threaten to expose a secret (many are told in intimate relationships).
Pretending to be suicidal. I've never heard of that one before, let alone the idea that it is employed by many. And what is your evidence that people who are not experiencing suicidal ideation threaten it to get what they want, other than that some of them remain alive??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:His wife left him because he got angry with her and hit the daughter hard enough to make her mouth start bleeding...just to get back at his wife. He was cruel. Is being an abusive monster is a mental illness?
I didn't say mentally ill people can't also be assholes. This guy did not kill himself to piss off his wife. And if he did, that would itself be extremely compelling evidence he was mentally ill.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are disgusting. If you knew anything about what happens when a parent commits suicide, you would know that what is most damaging to the child is living without the parent, and knowing that the parent committed suicide. This increases the chances of the child committing suicide, as they feel as though their parent has sort of made it "acceptable". Yet, when you advocate that suicidal people who cry for help are making "threats" and are "selfish" and should be served with restraining orders, you take away the only thing left that can keep them alive, which is the support of others. They have exhausted every tool in their belt. And you want them to just suck it up. That is a recipe for suicide. Your ignorance, your callousness, your righteous judgment against people in unimaginable pain just contributes to more pain.
For whatever its worth, I actually agree with a fair amount of what you are saying (or trying to say), but your moral indignation, name calling, and poor word choice makes me extremely reluctant to wade in on your side of this.
Totally agree. If the above PP is the same ranting one from upthread, and the same person who calls a child encountering a dead parent "unfortunate," their credibility is shot.
You can call it whatever you want PP. A threat is just a threat - it's either followed through on or not. For those that follow up on their threats, that's unfortunate to use your own wording. For those that don't, that's abuse. The problem is that no one knows, do they? Not knowing what the outcome is doesn't make it NOT a threat. It's still a threat.
And yes, it's selfish to commit suicide. No one is advocating that suicidal people just suck it up. You're twisting words because you're so worked up. No one said, "I think it's best if they don't get help, that they wallow in their pain and just end it all." What some people have said is that it's really horribly traumatizing to find someone who has committed suicide or to be collateral damage in their pain. Why is that so hard for you to understand?
Since you seem to like to post articles, what about this one?
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2009-11-15/news/0911140551_1_suicide-water-fight-man
I take something very different from that article. I was touched by the couple the man assisted just before he killed himself, who questioned whether they should have talked to him instead of just thanking him. And the friend who wished he had been contacted.
Yes, watching someone fall to their death is unpleasant. Hating your life so much that you jump is much more so. This expectation that the suicidal should be very polite in cleaning up after themselves is astounding. There are only so many ways to do it. The "neatest" one would be pills, but it rarely works. I suppose the second "neatest" would be carbon monoxide poisoning. But the resentment people on this thread have voiced against those who leave a mess behind after killing themselves is just incredible.
How many people witnessed people from the World Trade Center jump to the deaths? Should they be angry that they had to see that? I'm sure it was traumatizing for them. Perhaps those in the World Trade Center should have forced themselves to withstand the unbearable heat in order to spare those below having to see them fall. View the trajectory.
a) red herring argument;
b) find a person who witnessed these people falling and ask them if it was "unpleasant."
Anonymous wrote:I think you are projecting yourself too much onto other people who make suicide threats. This may have been true for you, but it is not necessarily true for most that threaten suicide. Some are nice people caught in a bad place that they can not figure out how to get out of, and are crying for help. Some are nasty horrible people. It varies a great deal.
Anonymous wrote:I think you are projecting yourself too much onto other people who make suicide threats. This may have been true for you, but it is not necessarily true for most that threaten suicide. Some are nice people caught in a bad place that they can not figure out how to get out of, and are crying for help. Some are nasty horrible people. It varies a great deal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you actually saying that someone who contemplates suicide and reaches out for help, but then changes his or her mind and does not do it is "abusive"?
That is a remarkable proposition.
No, but I'm not surprised you would take it that way, given your other comments.
Here is what was stated: For those that follow up on their threats, that's unfortunate to use your own wording. For those that don't, that's abuse
How should I interpret that? For those that kill themselves: Unfortunate
For those that don't: That's abuse.
Apparently I cannot read. Help me.
I mistyped. Where you and I aren't connecting is that you assume every threat, every word about suicide coming from someone's mouth is from a true sense of pain. When that's the case, I think everyone agrees with you that it's awful. But that's not the case, and you're naive if you think every time someone threatens suicide it's an honest threat. There are many times that it's used as a tool to manipulate, and that's what people are saying. For many people, they are left wondering if it's a credible threat or not, and they are manipulated into changing their behavior or staying with someone out of fear, when in reality that person was never going to commit suicide, they just knew the threat would be enough to get what they want.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
And I disagree that friends and loved ones are ill-equipped to deal with people that are in that very dark place. They know the person, they can connect with them. Understand them. Make them feel cared for. Most of the time, that's what the person needs the most. Professional help may also be necessary, but to walk away for a person experiencing acute suicidal ideation because you think you're being manipulated is the height of selfishness. What is manipulative about it? It's right there, out in the open. Is it attention-seeking? You bet. Someone is crying for attention.
I think you are projecting yourself too much onto other people who make suicide threats. This may have been true for you, but it is not necessarily true for most that threaten suicide. Some are nice people caught in a bad place that they can not figure out how to get out of, and are crying for help. Some are nasty horrible people. It varies a great deal.