Anonymous wrote:Doesn't your center school have representatives for the general education classes, too? DC is in GE at a center school, and they voted this week for two children from their individual class.
DC said he was voting for the two children that talked the longest. To him, they seemed to want it the most since they had taken the time to prepare the speech and spoke at length about why they wanted it. DC said he wasn't interested, because the meetings were during recess. In his mind, only a fool would want to give up their recess. Probably why he's in GE![]()

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a bit of an aside but another side effect of having a larger AAP population than Gen Ed is it is harder for Gen Ed kids to get elected to student council. The AAP kids all know each other better and tend to vote for each other. I see it at DC'S center.
Good point.
You should suggest that they do it differently. At our Center, two students (one rep plus one alternate) are elected from each classroom.
In addition, there should be a rule saying that no child can be elected more than once to student council (regardless of GE/AAP). In our school, the same kids get elected year after year. What does that say to the other kids?
Are you serious? It tells them that they think some kids are leaders. It says that they need to campaign harder if they want to be elected instead.In a few years, hardly anyone remembers who was on student council.
Um, yes, I am serious. I'm talking about the kids who are elected classroom reps, not the older ones who actually have to campaign. The same kids are voted classroom reps, year after year. It's a popularity contest, plain and simple.
From what my child has said the decisions about who to vote for are made almost completely based on looks. It isn't really popularity since the kids may not know the candidate in question at all, but if the person is good-looking (e.g., the prettiest girl), they will get the votes. It sounds like only my child and one other in their AAP class voted based on what the candidates actually said, though that could be an exaggeration.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Ah, classic DCUM! A discussion that began with statistics ends up in a snark-fest about student councils and popularity. Hijacked again.
And those whining about how those awful AAP kids prevent their non-AAP kids from getting onto student council -- bravo, you found yet ANOTHER thing that you can blame on AAP!
This discussion had nothing to do with AAP kids vs. GE kids as regards student council. It was about how the same kids (regardless of AAP/GE status) are elected classroom reps year after year. Why don't you read more carefully before chiming in with your own snark fest.
Nope, please read the entire thread. One poster claimed that AAP kids rule the student council at her kids' school because the AAP kids all vote for each other and the GE kids can't get on the council because of that. So yes, someone did indeed make student council an issue of AAP kids versus GE kids. Next time be sure you read it all yourself before telling others to do so.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Ah, classic DCUM! A discussion that began with statistics ends up in a snark-fest about student councils and popularity. Hijacked again.
And those whining about how those awful AAP kids prevent their non-AAP kids from getting onto student council -- bravo, you found yet ANOTHER thing that you can blame on AAP!
This discussion had nothing to do with AAP kids vs. GE kids as regards student council. It was about how the same kids (regardless of AAP/GE status) are elected classroom reps year after year. Why don't you read more carefully before chiming in with your own snark fest.
Anonymous wrote:
Ah, classic DCUM! A discussion that began with statistics ends up in a snark-fest about student councils and popularity. Hijacked again.
And those whining about how those awful AAP kids prevent their non-AAP kids from getting onto student council -- bravo, you found yet ANOTHER thing that you can blame on AAP!
Anonymous wrote:
Ah, classic DCUM! A discussion that began with statistics ends up in a snark-fest about student councils and popularity. Hijacked again.
And those whining about how those awful AAP kids prevent their non-AAP kids from getting onto student council -- bravo, you found yet ANOTHER thing that you can blame on AAP!
Anonymous wrote:Doesn't your center school have representatives for the general education classes, too? DC is in GE at a center school, and they voted this week for two children from their individual class.
DC said he was voting for the two children that talked the longest. To him, they seemed to want it the most since they had taken the time to prepare the speech and spoke at length about why they wanted it. DC said he wasn't interested, because the meetings were during recess. In his mind, only a fool would want to give up their recess. Probably why he's in GE![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a bit of an aside but another side effect of having a larger AAP population than Gen Ed is it is harder for Gen Ed kids to get elected to student council. The AAP kids all know each other better and tend to vote for each other. I see it at DC'S center.
Good point.
You should suggest that they do it differently. At our Center, two students (one rep plus one alternate) are elected from each classroom.
In addition, there should be a rule saying that no child can be elected more than once to student council (regardless of GE/AAP). In our school, the same kids get elected year after year. What does that say to the other kids?
Are you serious? It tells them that they think some kids are leaders. It says that they need to campaign harder if they want to be elected instead.In a few years, hardly anyone remembers who was on student council.
Um, yes, I am serious. I'm talking about the kids who are elected classroom reps, not the older ones who actually have to campaign. The same kids are voted classroom reps, year after year. It's a popularity contest, plain and simple.
Anonymous wrote:NP here; seems to me the reference to the PP's "unelectable child" deserved the karma response. Pretty rude.