Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some of these responses are funny. I turned down a huge, no-loans scholarship at Wash U and went to a prestigious East Coast SLAC (from which I later dropped out), and I alwayd regretted it profoundly. Wash U is excellent, and only moving up in the rankings. It is well funded and the alums are loyal to a fault; I know multiple recent grads who speak truly well of it.
The funny responses are from the people who try to make this school sound better than it is.
+1. St. Louis? Really?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some of these responses are funny. I turned down a huge, no-loans scholarship at Wash U and went to a prestigious East Coast SLAC (from which I later dropped out), and I alwayd regretted it profoundly. Wash U is excellent, and only moving up in the rankings. It is well funded and the alums are loyal to a fault; I know multiple recent grads who speak truly well of it.
The funny responses are from the people who try to make this school sound better than it is.
Anonymous wrote:Some of these responses are funny. I turned down a huge, no-loans scholarship at Wash U and went to a prestigious East Coast SLAC (from which I later dropped out), and I alwayd regretted it profoundly. Wash U is excellent, and only moving up in the rankings. It is well funded and the alums are loyal to a fault; I know multiple recent grads who speak truly well of it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some of these responses are funny. I turned down a huge, no-loans scholarship at Wash U and went to a prestigious East Coast SLAC (from which I later dropped out), and I alwayd regretted it profoundly. Wash U is excellent, and only moving up in the rankings. It is well funded and the alums are loyal to a fault; I know multiple recent grads who speak truly well of it.
Actually WUSTL dropped 5 places in the most recent rankings.
Anonymous wrote:Some of these responses are funny. I turned down a huge, no-loans scholarship at Wash U and went to a prestigious East Coast SLAC (from which I later dropped out), and I alwayd regretted it profoundly. Wash U is excellent, and only moving up in the rankings. It is well funded and the alums are loyal to a fault; I know multiple recent grads who speak truly well of it.
Anonymous wrote:Seems to attract very bright kids from our HS. Never really heard of it until DC's college search. Does it have a Midwestern vibe to it? Does is have enough brand name recognition outside of the Midwest? What are your thoughts/experiences?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's no better than U.Va. or College Park but popular with kids who can't get into Ivies, Stanford or Duke.
My kid was accepted at Yale, Stanford, and Duke (among other schools including Williams) but chose to attend WUSTL because it was one of the two "top 20" ranked schools (the other being Duke) that offered substantial merit-based aid (we don't qualify for need-based aid which is the only kind that most other top schools provide). My kid is not unique; WUSTL is teeming with students who got into "Ivies, Stanford or Duke" but, like my kid, are attending WUSTL because they received a half-to-full (+stipend) scholarship that is guaranteed for 4 years. I think that my kid would be attending Stanford if he hadn't received a scholarship to WUSTL but we simply didn't see the value of paying $60K per year when attending WUSTL is a fraction of the cost of attending any other top-ranked, private school and comparable to attending our state school. Even if WUSTL is "no better than U.VA or College Park" or if it's "popular with kids who can't get into Ivies, Stanford or Duke," WUSTL gives a lot of money to kids who can get into Ivies, etc. and these students attend too (my kid's dorm-mate turned down Harvard to choose between "full ride" scholarships from Duke and WUSTL).
As noted in the 2003 NY Times article, Wash U made a big endowment push more than a decade ago. A larger endowment lessens the need to maximize tuition income and allows schools to recruit elite students. We'd all be better off if every top 25 school used WASH U's approach to improving the school.
um, except Wash U has a markedly low share of poor students who receive Pell Grants, much lower than most of the other top 25 schools. I suspect this is by design, but YMMV.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's no better than U.Va. or College Park but popular with kids who can't get into Ivies, Stanford or Duke.
My kid was accepted at Yale, Stanford, and Duke (among other schools including Williams) but chose to attend WUSTL because it was one of the two "top 20" ranked schools (the other being Duke) that offered substantial merit-based aid (we don't qualify for need-based aid which is the only kind that most other top schools provide). My kid is not unique; WUSTL is teeming with students who got into "Ivies, Stanford or Duke" but, like my kid, are attending WUSTL because they received a half-to-full (+stipend) scholarship that is guaranteed for 4 years. I think that my kid would be attending Stanford if he hadn't received a scholarship to WUSTL but we simply didn't see the value of paying $60K per year when attending WUSTL is a fraction of the cost of attending any other top-ranked, private school and comparable to attending our state school. Even if WUSTL is "no better than U.VA or College Park" or if it's "popular with kids who can't get into Ivies, Stanford or Duke," WUSTL gives a lot of money to kids who can get into Ivies, etc. and these students attend too (my kid's dorm-mate turned down Harvard to choose between "full ride" scholarships from Duke and WUSTL).
As noted in the 2003 NY Times article, Wash U made a big endowment push more than a decade ago. A larger endowment lessens the need to maximize tuition income and allows schools to recruit elite students. We'd all be better off if every top 25 school used WASH U's approach to improving the school.
Anonymous wrote:Some guy wrote a book about how two mental patients bombarded the DCUM forums with incoherent messages about gaming the USNews rankings. Sequel coming out soon.