Anonymous wrote:He didn't last long though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it just possible that Arlington is better managed?
Seems to me that with the advent of Dale and his posse of Gibson, Smith and Strauss that things went downhill real fast.
According the Washington Area Boards of Education (WABE) for FY 2013 Arlingon per pupil spending was $18,675 and Fairfax's was $13,564. I think if Fairfax spent as much as Arlington, FCPS class sizes would be much smaller.
Not surprising that Fairfax has economies of scale beyond those enjoyed by Arlington. If I were in Arlington, I'd be asking why it doesn't have test scores or AAP programs equal to Fairfax.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it just possible that Arlington is better managed?
Seems to me that with the advent of Dale and his posse of Gibson, Smith and Strauss that things went downhill real fast.
According the Washington Area Boards of Education (WABE) for FY 2013 Arlingon per pupil spending was $18,675 and Fairfax's was $13,564. I think if Fairfax spent as much as Arlington, FCPS class sizes would be much smaller.
Anonymous wrote:True, but there are trailers sitting out at some schools that used to be full with classes till they cut back on teachers.
Anonymous wrote:Is it just possible that Arlington is better managed?
Seems to me that with the advent of Dale and his posse of Gibson, Smith and Strauss that things went downhill real fast.
Anonymous wrote:The school has trailers, but they aren't all used for classrooms.
Anonymous wrote:The frustrating part is that we have additional rooms for students, they are just used for other purposes because we are not allowed any more teachers.