Look, in the system you have set up - yes, you should be reimbursed for that time off. Shared baby, shared "hit" to the accounts. That's only fair.
But the whole system smacks of a "joint venture" instead of a marriage. I have no problem with people keeping a small account to themselves, but the majority of money should be pooled and spent on things your MARRIAGE needs, not you as individuals need. The way you're running things speaks to two individuals who happen to be sharing a home, not a married couple sharing their lives.
But yes, in the scenario you have provided, as sad as I think it is, he should absolutely reimburse you half.
Anonymous wrote:Yes you are crazy.
Anonymous wrote:WTF? Why should anyone - a mother or father - be compensated for raising their children? My DW and I raise our children together. We do not "split the costs." This woman is a loon. She sounds a bit like the one in a thread a while back who stole money from an insurance payment b/c it was her "compensation."
And who is compensating the unmarried woman who has a child, or the widow whose DH died in Afghanistan or Iraq or fighting a wildfire out West while she was pregnant? Riddle me that one. This whole thread is one of the craziest things I have ever read on DCUM. That's saying a lot b/c their are a lot of very warped people on these boards.
Anonymous wrote:Wow, on this theory my husband owes me big time for the multi-million dollar career I gave up as a top flight lawyer to stay home with the kids. And it was my choice. I had no idea he owed me big time! I thought I should be grateful for the fact he was working hard to keep us all going and taking on all that stress to pay for our house, private school, the tutors, college, the cars, the property tax, etc. etc.
Anonymous wrote:My husband and I have separate accounts and agree on who should pay what, based on who makes more and what is fair. It's not 50/50, it's based on income proportion and what makes sense. It works well for us.
But it would never occur to me to ask to be "reimbursed" for my maternity leave or some portion of it. My husband is not my insurer. It seems to me you are basically asking him to take no income in place of you having no income. Why is it more fair for him to take a hit than for you to take a hit? Does he make twice as much as you? That would be the only circumstance that would make sense.
It seems to me that if you had the expectation that your maternity leave would be fully funded, that should have been discussed between the two of you prior to your taking the leave, and the length of the leave negotiated (and the funding source as well) prior to the leave. Your hitting him up with a bill -- essentially -- after leave is really kind of inappropriate.
One final thought. His duty is to pay for his child's needs, which I assume he is doing, and to provide a home for you. No husband pays his wife a salary.
.Anonymous wrote:I think you are going to need to take a hard look at your banking set up now that you have a child. Who's paying for all of the baby basic expenses, medical bills, daycare, child enrichment classes & activities? The current system you have only works for couples without children, I'm a financial advisor so I've seen it all.
Anonymous wrote:My husband and I met late in life and decided to keep separate bank accounts except for one small shared checking acct that we use for groceries, restaurants, etc. My four-month maternity leave was largely unpaid. Am I crazy to want him to pay for half of my lost wages?
i brought it up and he was very offended. I think he thought that I thought that he was taking advantage of me or not doing his share. It's not that I think that it's just that I take pride in having no debt and in the amount of money have saved especially because i have never had any help and really had to scrimp and save early on. i don't want to grow resentful that I took a huge hit and he didn't have to. He makes about 15% more than I do annually. I am not worried about our marriage so this isn't a matter of dividing assets it's just that I don't think that my bank accounts should suffer such a big hit and not his. I like the feeling of equality that comes from knowing that even though he's older and has an advanced degree, I can bring just as much savings the table when we make big purchases.
Am i crazy to think my husband should pay for half of my lost wages?
For what it's worth my husband wanted me to take four months off and stay home because he couldn't take any time.
But it would never occur to me to ask to be "reimbursed" for my maternity leave or some portion of it. My husband is not my insurer. It seems to me you are basically asking him to take no income in place of you having no income. Why is it more fair for him to take a hit than for you to take a hit? Does he make twice as much as you? That would be the only circumstance that would make sense.
Anonymous wrote:Wow, on this theory my husband owes me big time for the multi-million dollar career I gave up as a top flight lawyer to stay home with the kids. And it was my choice. I had no idea he owed me big time! I thought I should be grateful for the fact he was working hard to keep us all going and taking on all that stress to pay for our house, private school, the tutors, college, the cars, the property tax, etc. etc.
Anonymous wrote:You are both insane. Is this a business or a loving relationship? Are you going to keep track of who takes more sick days? Are you going to keep a tally on who bought diapers last? If this marriage lasts 3 more years, you will be lucky.